Aug 14, 2021
The matter of mind control
Science 13 Aug 2021:
Vol. 373, Issue 6556, pp. 749
In 1976, Patty Hearst, the granddaughter of American publishing magnate William Randolph Hearst, was found guilty of bank robbery, a crime she committed after enduring a sustained period of time as a captive of the domestic terrorist organization known as the Symbionese Liberation Army. The trial, with its glittering cast of expert witnesses, became a test case for psychological theories of brainwashing.
In addition to commenting on Hearst's intelligence and differentiating her behavior from those typically displayed by malingerers, the experts invoked the experiences of US prisoners of war (POWs) in Korea and the concept of “debility, dependency, and dread” to explain how Hearst, in their view, was not acting of her own free will when she committed the robbery. Instead, they argued, she was in thrall to the coercive persuasion of her captors. The jury was unconvinced and sentenced Hearst to 35 years in prison. However, President Jimmy Carter found the arguments persuasive and commuted her sentence after 22 months, and President Bill Clinton pardoned Hearst in 2001. This trial, and the debates surrounding it, is one of 10 key moments in the history of the idea of brainwashing examined by psychiatrist Joel E. Dimsdale in his new book, Dark Persuasion.
A tragedy close to home inspired Dimsdale to dive deeply into this topic. In 1997, as the comet Hale-Bopp approached, his neighbors committed suicide at the instructions of the leaders of the Heaven's Gate cult, who were convinced that death was necessary to free members of their “bodily vehicles” and allow them to ascend to heaven.
The word “brainwashing” was coined in the early years of the Cold War by journalist Edward Hunter to describe reeducation techniques used for indoctrination in Communist China and was subsequently invoked to make sense of the defection of 21 American POWs to China after the Korean War. Elements of brainwashing can be traced back much further to techniques used in religious conversion and inquisition, but the fear unleashed by the provocative term precipitated the Central Intelligence Agency's infamous MKUltra experiments, which made use of the hallucinogen LSD, sensory deprivation, and electroconvulsive therapy during interrogations to coerce confessions and reached their bleak crescendo with a series of highly abusive experiments carried out on psychiatric patients by McGill University psychiatrist Donald Ewen Cameron between 1957 and 1964.
The book avoids making sweeping claims about the nature of brainwashing, but after a chronological assessment of each case study, Dimsdale presents a comparative table of the key features at play, including techniques such as sleep manipulation, coercion and manipulation, intentional surreptitiousness, and participation in activities not in the subject's best interests. That some combination of these are present in varying degrees in all of the cases cited suggests that Dimsdale sees them as necessary and sufficient criteria for describing brainwashing with some degree of certainty. Some of the 21st-century examples he discusses briefly in the book's last section, including controversies surrounding deep brain stimulation and the rise of social media platforms and conspiracy theories, do not quite fit these criteria, however.
While there is novelty in the synthesis of these case studies, Dark Persuasion does not offer much new material, and Dimsdale has not unearthed any substantial unexpected archival finds or generated new oral histories. However, his account of the Hearst trial is carefully researched and supplemented with a wealth of scientific papers from the time. And while the causal link he suggests between Pavlov's experiments with traumatized dogs and the interrogation and torture processes that led to false confessions in Stalin's show trials is based on slender evidence, Dimsdale's observations about the proximity of these events are nevertheless astute.
But historical rigor is not necessarily the point of this highly readable and compelling book. Dimsdale's goal is to prompt reflection on what he sees as the overlooked reality of coercive persuasion at a broader level and the ever-present threat that it poses to individuals and to society at large—a threat, he warns, that is becoming ever-amplified by new technologies and mass media. In this aim, he succeeds admirably.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/373/6556/749.full
May 20, 2020
CultNEWS101 Articles: 5/20/2020
Komo News: FTC warning to Multi-Level and Network Marketing companies: Cool it on the claims
" ... The FTC is going after multi-level marketers that use the coronavirus pandemic in their pitches to sell products or recruit new people."Two concerns that you have to be aware of when you're a MLM participant," said FTC Regional Director Chuck Harwood. First, you want to make sure that you're passing on reliable information."Recent warning letters to 10 MLM companies point to unsubstantiated health claims related to COVID, that have no scientific verification and violate the FTC Act, which prohibits misleading and deceptive practices."There's simply no substantiation that the kinds of products that are being marketed and sold through these MLM schemes will prevent someone from contracting COVID-19 or help you recover from COVID-19 any faster than you would otherwise," Harwood saidAnother big problem is inflated claims about the money you can make with a network marketing business."You have to be very careful if you're investing in one, be sure that the promises of how much money you're going to make, are actually truthful. a lot of times they're inflated," Harwood said. "A lot of times, what we find is that people who get into these kind of schemes- whether it's related to COVID-19 or anything else- find that they lose far more money than they ever make."The FTC website dedicates an entire section to multi-level marketing businesses and pyramid schemes and how to tell the difference. You can also learn what to look for and how to research a company before you get involved."
"A celebrity cook who called the coronavirus a government trick to plant mind control chips into Germans under the guise of vaccinations was hauled away by police from an unlawful demonstration in front of the parliament building. A pop star attacked face mask requirements and demanded evidence that Covid-19 really exists, while a leading Roman Catholic Cardinal in Germany added his name to a letter claiming the pandemic was a pretext to create a global government.Prominent supporters of conspiracy theories are focusing on the Covid-19 shutdown that has crippled economies around the world, with angry protests against government-imposed limits on freedoms erupting across the country in the past week, despite rules banning such gatherings.Police and journalists have also been injured in spasms of violent outbursts at the at-times unruly demonstrations. There are growing fears that the eclectic groups could exacerbate doubts about democracy in Germany by capitalising on the turmoil of the coronavirus."
CNN: Televangelist Jim Bakker is recovering from a stroke, his wife says
"Famed televangelist Jim Bakker recently had a stroke, his wife said. His eponymous TV show will continue to film without him while he recovers.Lori Bakker announced her 80-year-old husband would take a sabbatical from "The Jim Bakker Show," the Christian TV program the couple cohosts.Working nonstop took a "huge toll" on her husband's health, she said. Bakker was recently sued by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt for claiming a silver product could kill coronavirus."We are thankful that Jim is okay, and that he is now at home with our family," she wrote in a Facebook post from the show's page. "Jim will be back!"For decades, Bakker and his then-wife, the late Tammy Faye Messner, ran the evangelistic empire "Praise the Lord," or PTL, from their own theme park in Fort Mill, South Carolina, near Charlotte, North Carolina. The two hosted "The PTL Club," one of the best-known Christian programs of its time, throughout the 1970s and '80s.He stepped down from the ministry in 1987 amid financial and sex scandals. The Charlotte Observer reported then that he'd paid off a church secretary with whom he'd had sex. He briefly handed over the reins to fellow televangelist Jerry Falwell Sr.Two years later, he was charged with fraud and sentenced to 45 years in prison, though he served just under five.He returned to TV in the 2000s with "The Jim Bakker Show," this time filmed from Missouri with his second wife, Lori, as cohost.But on a February episode of the show, Bakker and a guest discussed a product, called "Silver Solution," that they claimed could eliminate the coronavirus from the body within hours. There's currently no cure for the novel coronavirus, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."
"The Jerusalem District Attorney's Office announced Monday that a sex offender rabbi who has been accused of defrauding his sick and elderly followers out of millions of shekels will be indicted, pending a hearing, for a number of alleged fraud and tax offenses.
Eliezer Berland will be charged with tax evasion, violations of money laundering laws and other offenses for failing to report and even concealing income generated through his activities at his ultra-Orthodox Shuvu Bonim sect.
Berland allegedly carried out counseling, fundraising and teaching and also offered what were called life-saving benedictions — all for a fee that wasn't declared to the authorities.
In addition, he is expected to be charged for paying employees millions of shekels without salary slips or paying tax as required.
The expected charges are in addition to a parallel case in which he was arrested for fraud after hundreds of people filed a police complaint against him for selling prayers and "wonder drugs" to desperate members of his community, and for promising families of individuals with disabilities that their loved ones would be able to walk and families of convicted felons that their loved ones would be freed from prison."
Apr 6, 2020
Neuroscience Explains How a Narcissist Can Control Our Brain
Darlene Lancer, JD, LMFT
Psychology Today
Apr 03, 2020
A new study sheds light on how other people influence our mind. Research on mice, whose brains are remarkably similar to humans, reveals that our brains are affected by those around us. The key factor is dominance. The brain of the subordinate mouse synchronized to the dominant mouse. This likely applies to our relationships. Typically, people with stronger personalities make the decisions and get their needs met more often than their partners do.
Other factors play a part. The more the mice interacted with each other, the more their brain activity was synched. Hence, the longevity and intensity of a relationship affect the degree to which those close to us have influence. A further twist on brain synchrony turns on two types of brain cells. One set is focused on our own behavior, and a second set focuses on other people. How we think and where we place our attention matters. At Carnegie Mellon University, neuroscientists are tracking our thoughts in fMRI’s brain scans to see which areas and neurons light up. Self and other neurons light up in varying degrees among certain populations.*
Dominance vs. Balance in Relationships
Ideally, friendships and intimate relationships are balanced so that both friends and partners have an equal say in decision-making. Overall, both individuals get their needs met. They each are able to assert themselves and negotiate on their own behalf. There is give and take and compromise. This is an interdependent relationship. It requires autonomy, self-esteem, mutual respect, and assertive communication skills.
Contrast relationships where power is imbalanced, such as in abusive relationships. One individual leads and the other follows; one dominates and the other accommodates. Some relationships are characterized by constant conflict and power struggles. My book Conquering Shame and Codependency describes traits and motivations of “Master” and “Accommodator” personalities. The master is aggressive and motivated to maintain power and control, while the accommodator is passive and motivated to maintain love and connection. Most of us have aspects of both types in our personality, although some people predominantly fall into one category. For example, many codependents are accommodators, and most narcissists prefer to be masters.
How Our Partner Controls Our Brain
Brain synchronization enables the dominant animal to lead and subordinate animals to read its cues and follow. What does this mean for our relationships? The new research suggests that in unequal relationships, the dominant partner’s brain entrains that of the subordinate partner, whose brain will synchronize with it. This pattern becomes more established the longer the couple interacts. Even though some individuals may be assertive and appear to behave independently prior to or outside of the relationship, once they're attached to a master, they increasingly accommodate the dominant partner. There are many variables at work, but presumably, brain synchronization is one that makes it harder for the subordinate person in the relationship to think and act autonomously and challenge the power imbalance.
People who are accommodators focus on others more than themselves. They admit to losing themselves in relationships. They monitor and adapt to other people’s needs, wants, and feelings. If you ask them what’s on their mind, it’s usually about someone else. One might suppose that their “other neurons” light up more consistently than “self neurons.” Their personalities prime them to do so. In contrast, brains of masters and narcissists probably light up “self neurons” more than “other neurons.”
How to Combat Brain Control
The synchronization process happens automatically and outside of our conscious control. It supports healthy relationships by allowing partners to be “in sync,” and read each other’s cues and minds. We know what our partner feels and needs. When there’s mutuality, love deepens, and happiness multiplies for both. On the other hand, where this process is in the service of one partner controlling the other, the relationship becomes toxic. Love and happiness wither and die.
The dominant partner has no incentive to give up control. It’s up to the subordinate partner to change the relationship dynamics. In doing so, power in the relationship may re-balance. Regardless, he or she will have gained the autonomy and mental strength to enjoy a better life or leave the relationship. Basic steps to making these changes are:
Learn all you can about codependency and abuse.
- Join Codependents Anonymous and begin psychotherapy.
- Build your self-esteem.
- Learn not to react to putdowns or your partner’s attempts to control and manipulate you.
- Learn to be assertive and set boundaries.
- Develop activities and interests you participate in without your partner.
- Learn mindfulness meditation to strengthen your mind.
© 2019 Darlene Lancer
References
*60 Minutes Ep. 52, “How MRI scans are showing scientists the physical makeup of our thoughts,” Nov 24, 2019.
Lancer, D. (2014). Conquering Shame and Codependency: 8 Steps to Freeing the True You. Center City, MN: Hazelden Foundation.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/toxic-relationships/202004/neuroscience-explains-how-narcissist-can-control-our-brain
Sep 6, 2016
They Say Government Mind Control Is Real-And That They're Part of It
Over the past 30 years, thousands of people who identify as “targeted individuals” claim the government is engaging in covert war on their minds.
JUSTIN ROHRLICH
09.04.16
Cheryl Welsh has been the target of a secret U.S. government mind-control experiment for almost 30 years.
Or, so she believes. A former medical receptionist in Sacramento, Welsh was a freshman at the University of California, Davis in 1987 when she noticed electrical appliances were “remotely targeted to harass” her. Phones, cars, typewriters, and TVs would stop working at inopportune times.
“Streetlights would go on and off as I walked by, and this was before the sensor technology of today,” Welsh told The Daily Beast. “I traveled to Wisconsin and went to Europe, but wherever I went, the strange harassive things would occur.”
Soon, Welsh became convinced that her thoughts were being read by unknown external forces, “24/7, with precision.” She says staged situations played out on the street in front of her, engineered by strangers who appeared to know exactly what she was thinking.
Welsh was terrified. But she was too embarrassed to say anything to anyone for fear of sounding crazy.
“I’ve always trusted my mental health, and I don’t believe in the supernatural, or UFOs, or anything like that,” Welsh said. “So I knew I wasn’t imagining these things.”
She set out to find others who had experienced similar phenomena, and found that she was not alone. Welsh eventually came to the conclusion that she was the subject of covert U.S. government testing. After all, she explains, who but the government possessed the technological know-how to cause what she was experiencing?
When asked what she has done to try and stop the harassment, Welsh responds, “What haven’t I done? I’ve hired scientists, electronics experts, private investigators, and more. I was interviewed on CNN and they had their electronics expert come out and test my home, but they didn’t find anything. Well, of course they didn’t find anything—they didn’t look for military signals.”
* * *
People like Welsh, who started a nonprofit called Mindjustice.org in 1996, call themselves “targeted individuals” or “TIs.” Kevin Bond, an unemployed bartender in Palm Springs, California, says he believes a local family drugged him, implanted a microchip in his head while he was unconscious, and now controls his thoughts and behavior. “H.D.,” a tenured professor at a West Coast university who wished to keep his real name private, is convinced his brain is being manipulated by electronic frequencies coming from a nearby government installation.
The phenomenon is nothing new, but has taken off in recent years.
“It’s undeniable that the technology exists, but if you go to the police and say, ‘I’m hearing voices,’ they’re going to lock you up for psychiatric evaluation,” one TI told Sharon Weinberger of The Washington Post in 2007.
Since then, conspiracy culture has only seeped further and further into the mainstream. Arizona Sen. John McCain’s challenger in the 2016 Republican primary was state senator and osteopathic physician Kelli Ward, who onceorganized a townhall meeting focused on “chemtrails,” described by conspiracy theorists as nefarious, aircraft-borne “plasma weapons system[s]...carrying out mind control against the human population on a global (as well as national, regional and individual) scale.” (Ward has deniedbelieving in chemtrails, which are in fact nothing more than condensation produced by planes under certain atmospheric conditions.)
The number of people who identify as TIs, though difficult to pin down definitively, has been estimated to exceed 10,000. Yet, according to The New York Times, which this summer profiled a woman who believed the NSA had brainwashed her friends and neighbors into believing she was a terrorist, “the phenomenon remains virtually unresearched.” At the same time, a fairly extensive market has emerged to make a quick buck off of sufferers.
* * *
Roger Tolces, a former Los Angeles audio-visual equipment salesman, now runs a “professional private investigative agency with the ability to find and then help you to eliminate Electronic Harassment.”
“I don’t talk too much about what we do, we try to fly under the radar,” Tolces explained, saying that he employs “several” people, but declining to elaborate further. “You’ve got to understand who’s behind this stuff.”
On his website, Tolces sells an “Electrostatic Active Shield System” for “about $1,000.”
“Any directed energy attack is deflected off this energy field giving the targeted individual the ability to get ongoing relief,” the product description reads.
Others capitalize on the fact that TIs are often told that their problems are psychiatric. “No, you’re not crazy! We listen and care,” Chicago’s Total Security Inc. tells prospective customers.
“We perform non-invasive body scans to identify implanted microchips and other forms of electronic tracking GSP/Cellular/ chips,” Total Security’s website explains. “We check with high-gauge TSCM (Technical Surveillance Counter Measures) equipment that will locate and identify if one is subject to internal microelectronic implants. Please note: We are not medical professionals, we simply scan without any harm to a person and identity if in fact one is subject to an electronic possible threat.”
TIs also spend considerable sums of money on products that promise protection from things like “remote brain manipulation,” “psychotronic weapons,” and “psychic and spiritual attacks.”
One such item is the QuWave Defender, which comes in four versions: Personal ($297), Tabletop ($499), Triple Tabletop (now on sale for $997), and Briefcase Sentinel ($1,197). It supposedly generates what the Los Angeles-based company calls a “Scalar Wave Field,” a special frequency possessing the “unique property of being able to interfere with harmful rays, reduce the effect and functioning of implants, and act as a barrier to psycho-electronic harmful signals aimed at the individual.”
The personal unit, which is about the size and shape of a pager, features a lanyard so it can be worn around one’s neck for constant protection. The Sentinel adds “a special unique circuitry which cyclically varies the generated frequencies as a countermeasure so that the perpetrators can't lock on to the unit's frequency in order to circumvent its operation and defeat the unit.”
QuWave, which appears to operate as a multi-level marketing operation, with distributors who buy products in bulk then resell them, did not reply when asked about sales figures and the size of the company. However, Amy Kimball, a QuWave sales rep, agreed to speak briefly by phone. Many people who order Defenders—or any of QuWave’s 21 other, similar products, including ones for pets—are concerned that their units will be disabled by nefarious forces before they even arrive, Kimball explained.
“You wouldn’t believe some of the stuff we’ve had to do for customers,” Kimball said. “They don’t trust the Post Office, they don’t trust the government. It’s—interesting.” (For an extra $10, customers can add a “Tamper-Evident Security Seal” to any order.)
A foil-lined fabric called MagnetShield is recommended by StopBeamWeapons.com, which advises wrapping one’s head and neck in it “to minimize partial brain disablement from covert anti-brain beam weapons by partially shielding the target (themselves) from covert EMF anti-brain beam weapons.”
MagnetShield is distributed by LessEMF.com, a 20-year-old company in upstate New York with eight employees. Emil DeToffol, LessEMF.com’s president, said there are “many thousands of people who are genuinely sensitive to electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) and do require shielding and meters,” he says. (The assertion that EMF fields are harmful to humans iscontested by almost all mainstream scientists.) “But there is a subset who claim or believe that they are being targeted by the government or aliens or whomever it may be.”
“They’re looking for shielding materials, garments, fabrics, metals, paints, and meters for measuring, but oftentimes they can’t really articulate what they’re trying to shield from or trying to measure,” said DeToffol.
That’s because none of what these people are trying to protect against actually exists, says Benjamin Radford, a fellow at the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, a New York think tank that promotes science-based reasoning. Further, this sort of “thought broadcasting”—which is known among conspiracy theorists as “Remote Neural Monitoring,” or “RNM”—is a classicmanifestation of paranoid schizophrenia, says Dr. Michael Sacks, an attending psychiatrist at NewYork Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center.
The delusions tend to reflect the cultural and scientific zeitgeist of the time. The subjects of Victor Tausk’s seminal 1919 paper, “On the Origin of the ‘Influencing Machine’ in Schizophrenia,” described the same sorts of things as people do today. But instead of bleeding-edge technology utilizing electromagnetic rays and microchips, the faceless thought monitors of a century ago utilized mechanical contraptions consisting of cranks and levers.
* * *
A good deal of the current support for the existence in RNM can be traced back to the misinterpretation of an oft-cited 1994 government report that made mention of futuristic systems that could “electronically scramble or erase” people’s minds through TV broadcasts.
It was co-written by Dr. Steven Metz, then an associate research professor of National Security Affairs at the U.S. Army War College’s Strategic Studies Institute (SSI). Metz, who is now SSI’s director of research, says it was a totally speculative thought experiment, which included the overthrow of Fidel Castro and assorted other world events that hadn’t, and still haven’t, happened.
According to Metz, the project was intended to spur debate and discussion among readers—senior military leaders, not the general public—about the very dangerous implications of technologies that could influence people’s behavior, were such a thing ever to exist at some point in the future.
“To illustrate this, I concocted a hypothetical future scenario where the military had what I called thought control technology which led it to some dark and highly undesirable positions,” said Metz said in an email. “But here’s the rub—I totally made that scenario up while driving to work. It was pure fiction that I was using to make a point.”
When the internet started to become widely available in the late 1990s, Metz’s paper began reaching not only the defense community, but the general public. Metz soon found his name being mentioned in online forums and chat rooms, blogs, and conspiracy sites.
Long, florid tracts posted across dozens of sites purport to “prove” the existence of secret government mind control programs using official documents are now available on the web. Some seemed to think Metz had inadvertently stumbled onto a secret government program. Others thought he was part of it. Another group didn’t believe Metz existed at all, and was himself a government illusion.
Metz points out that his paper was loaded with disclaimers, making clear that he was not referring to existing technology or making predictions. Nevertheless, Metz began getting increasingly unhinged phone calls, emails, multi-page letters, and faxes chronicling government campaigns to take over the writers’ brains.
Metz, who had young children at the time, says he installed a home security system and got a concealed carry permit.
“Of course since it's impossible to logically prove a negative, I can't say categorically that there is no ‘Men Who Talk to Goats’ program or technologies out there,” Metz says. “But if there is, I don’t know anything about it.”
Cheryl Welsh, for one, isn’t convinced.
“I continue to find substantiating evidence of what I think is going on with secret neuroweapons,” she argues, adding that none of the various products and services she has purchased have been any help at all. “They promise these amazing results, but it’s really just phony baloney stuff.”
Feb 28, 2016
MIND CONTROL: How people become trapped in Cults
How normal people like you and I can easily become gradually duped over a period of time into becoming deceived by a destructive cult!
This video also reveals another frightening scenario: how a handful of corrupt people in positions of authority in the military could issue unjust unconstitutional orders to their subordinates to carry out acts of violence against their fellow countrymen, citizens who are guilty of nothing more than exercising their God-given Constitutional rights to keep and bear arms and protect their lands and their homes and the lives of themselves and their families!
https://youtu.be/8aw_5cmCwoc
Mar 7, 2014
Eight Criteria for Thought Reform
- Milieu Control. This involves the control of information and communication both within the environment and, ultimately, within the individual, resulting in a significant degree of isolation from society at large.
- Mystical Manipulation. There is manipulation of experiences that appear spontaneous but in fact were planned and orchestrated by the group or its leaders in order to demonstrate divine authority or spiritual advancement or some special gift or talent that will then allow the leader to reinterpret events, scripture, and experiences as he or she wishes.
- Demand for Purity. The world is viewed as black and white and the members are constantly exhorted to conform to the ideology of the group and strive for perfection. The induction of guilt and/or shame is a powerful control device used here.
- Confession. Sins, as defined by the group, are to be confessed either to a personal monitor or publicly to the group. There is no confidentiality; members' "sins," "attitudes," and "faults" are discussed and exploited by the leaders.
- Sacred Science. The group's doctrine or ideology is considered to be the ultimate Truth, beyond all questioning or dispute. Truth is not to be found outside the group. The leader, as the spokesperson for God or for all humanity, is likewise above criticism.
- Loading the Language. The group interprets or uses words and phrases in new ways so that often the outside world does not understand. This jargon consists of thought-terminating clichés, which serve to alter members' thought processes to conform to the group's way of thinking.
- Doctrine over person. Member's personal experiences are subordinated to the sacred science and any contrary experiences must be denied or reinterpreted to fit the ideology of the group.
- Dispensing of existence. The group has the prerogative to decide who has the right to exist and who does not. This is usually not literal but means that those in the outside world are not saved, unenlightened, unconscious and they must be converted to the group's ideology. If they do not join the group or are critical of the group, then they must be rejected by the members. Thus, the outside world loses all credibility. In conjunction, should any member leave the group, he or she must be rejected also. (Lifton, 1989)


