Dec 4, 2016

THIRTY YEARS IN CAPTIVITY

A curtain hangs across the window of one of the London houses in which Aravindan Balakrishnan lived with his followers.
One woman’s escape from a London cult.

The New Yorker
By Simon Parkin
DECEMBER 3, 2016

Rosie grew up in a succession of decrepit houses in South London with one man and a rotating cast of women, who claimed that they had found her on the streets as an infant. The man, Aravindan Balakrishnan—Comrade Bala, as he wanted to be called—was the head of the household. He instructed the women to deny Rosie’s existence to outsiders, and forbade them from comforting her when she cried. “Balakrishnan told us that lesbianism was caused when females cuddle female babies,” one of the women, Aisha Wahab, told me recently. “No one dared show affection.” Rosie was not registered with local authorities, health-care providers, or schools. As a child, she often stood by a window, hoping that passersby would notice her. Once, after she exchanged greetings with the granddaughter of an elderly neighbor through a hole in the garden fence, Balakrishnan warned her that the girl intended to lure her away to be held hostage. He regularly lost his temper with Rosie, beating her and threatening to kill her. Sometimes, after an argument, she would retreat to the bathroom, to check whether the toilet still flushed. “When it worked, I kissed the handle,” Rosie, who is now thirty-three, recalled earlier this year. “I told it, ‘Thank you for being on my side.’ ”

One day in 1995, when Rosie was twelve, Balakrishnan showed her an identification card from the hospital where she was born. In a box marked “relationship to child,” Sian Davies, one of the women living in the house, had written “mother.” The revelation sat strangely in Rosie’s mind; at the time, she explained, she “didn’t have a concept of parents.” One night the following December, she was asleep in her bedroom when she heard shouting below. She ran downstairs to see Davies, whom Balakrishnan had caught trying to visit her family for Christmas, bound and gagged by the front door. The next day, Christmas Eve, the women found Davies in the back yard; she had fallen from a window on the second floor of the house and broken her neck on the concrete below. She was taken to King’s College Hospital. “Bala didn’t visit the first day,” Rosie told me. “He said that he wanted Sian to think she was abandoned. That would make her pull up her socks and start to think about what she’d done.” Later, Balakrishnan began making weekly visits, bringing Rosie with him. One day in the spring, as they stood to leave, she ventured, “Bye-bye, mummy.” Davies replied, “Bye-bye, baby.”

Rosie remembers being wary of wrongly reading the moment. “Sometimes you can call somebody ‘baby’ and it doesn’t mean they have to be your actual child,” she told me. Having spent three decades of her life in the commune, she has a way of talking that can seem startlingly literal. She escaped in 2013, at the age of thirty, with the assistance of Yvonne Hall and Gerard Stocks, the husband-and-wife founders of the Palm Cove Society, which provides support for victims of human trafficking and domestic abuse. Jenny Cutler, a consultant forensic psychologist for the United Kingdom’s National Crime Agency, was one of the first people to interview her after her escape. “She had an excellent vocabulary and was able to articulate interesting perspectives on the world,” Cutler told me. “But she also had a scarily underdeveloped understanding of the kinds of social behaviors people tend to acquire from early childhood—almost a pre-pubescent level.” According to Hall, Rosie was largely unable to function outside the house. She didn’t know how to cross roads safely, or to ask for change in shops. She’d misjudge social cues, flinging her arms around new people she met, occasionally telling strangers how attractive she found them.

Still, Rosie learned quickly. “We expected her to live with us for no more than two years,” Hall said. “She moved out in fourteen months.” In that time, she changed her name from Rosie to Katherine and adopted her mother’s family names. Now Katy Morgan-Davies has her own apartment in Leeds and takes classes in English and mathematics at a local college. She seems a cheerful sort of person, with a friendly, open face framed with riotous curls. Balakrishnan, meanwhile, is serving a twenty-three-year prison sentence, having been found guilty, late last year, of child cruelty, false imprisonment, and sexual assault against two women. (Several calls to Balakrishnan’s attorney went unreturned.)

Morgan-Davies’s visit to the hospital in the spring of 1997 was her last. Four months later, her mother died, at the age of forty-four. Sian Davies had been a vengeful chaperone, regularly reporting her daughter’s misbehavior, however slight, to Balakrishnan. “It sounds horrible to say, but I almost felt relieved,” Morgan-Davies recalled. “I actually got a lot more freedom.” But, ultimately, her situation did not improve. Denied real autonomy, she began, in the next seventeen years, to see herself as an “unperson,” trapped by the man who, shortly after his arrest, was confirmed by a police DNA test to be her father. Cutler often works with victims of modern slavery, a legal category that includes many forms of exploitation—sex trafficking, forced labor, organ harvesting—but is largely defined by imprisonment. Morgan-Davies’s case, she said, is unique. “It was phenomenal damage to do to a child,” Cutler told me.

When Aravindan Balakrishnan was growing up, in Kerala, in southern India, his mother often warned him not to curse people when he was angry. According to Morgan-Davies, she believed that her eldest son possessed occult powers, and nicknamed him Black Tongue; later, as an adult, Balakrishnan would boast that he could set people aflame by looking at them. He was a good student, and won a British Council scholarship, at the age of twenty-three, to study at the London School of Economics. When he arrived in England’s capital, in 1963, dozens of far-left organizations were seeking recruits from among London’s poorer, immigrant-heavy neighborhoods, attempting to rally them in the face of a nationalistic right wing. By 1967, Balakrishnan had suspended his studies at the university and joined the Communist Party of England. He was later expelled for pursuing “conspiratorial and splittish activities.”

Balakrishnan persuaded a small group of people—including Chanda Pattni, a classmate from Tanzania, whom he later married—to follow him. Together, they founded their own party, the Workers’ Institute of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought. It was headquartered on Acre Lane, in South London’s Brixton neighborhood, at a bookshop that Balakrishnan dubbed the Mao Memorial Centre. The place was spacious, its shelves packed with red-jacketed revolutionary literature, its windows covered with Chinese flags. Balakrishnan’s followers wore Mao jackets and caps studded with Mao badges, and they once held a celebration on the Chairman’s birthday. Eventually, they moved in to a communal house in Clapham, South London. “All the people who were there were vulnerable in different ways,” Morgan-Davies said. “They were at the end of their rope, and they came to him. He was like their savior.”

Pattni lived in the Clapham house, as did Sian Davies, who had studied law in Wales before moving to London, and Wahab, who was originally from Malaysia. There was also Josie Herivel, the well-off daughter of John Herivel, one of the Bletchley Park scientists who helped to break the Nazis’ Enigma code during the Second World War. A wunderkind violinist, she had abandoned her career in 1976, after attending one of Balakrishnan’s lectures. “I grew up with my father, who was supposed to have one of the best brains in Britain, but my mind was not excited,” Herivel, who was not available for comment for this article, told the Guardian earlier this year. “Aravindan really excited my mind.” Balakrishnan’s sister-in-law, Shobna, gave the commune social cover. She was confined to a wheelchair, and when outsiders invited the women over, Morgan-Davies told me, caring for Shobna was their excuse to stay home.

Inside the house, Balakrishnan enforced control by encouraging rivalries among the women and keeping them financially dependent. He warned them that if they strayed, an invisible machine would punish them. He called it jackie, an acronym of Jehovah, Allah, Christ, Krishna, and the Immortal Easwaran—the last of these being a scholar and spiritual teacher from Kerala. If any of the women tried to flee, Balakrishnan said, jackie would zap them with lasers. If they had disloyal thoughts, jackie would make the household appliances go haywire.

In 1979, Pattni fell into a diabetic coma and was hospitalized for several weeks. Balakrishnan turned his attention on some of the other women. Two of them, whom he was later convicted of sexually abusing, fled. A third, Davies, became pregnant with Katy. When Pattni recovered from her coma, Balakrishnan told her that the conception was the result not of an affair but of “electronic warfare.”

Morgan-Davies’s childhood was defined by isolation. One reprieve, however, came in the form of Balakrishnan’s personal library. “There were books about psychology, books about philosophy, books about politics,” she told me. “But he never used to read them. He just used to put them there for show.” The women taught Morgan-Davies to read and write, and the books gave her characters with whom to populate her imagination. When she cooked, she would pretend that she was feeding sick luminaries. “I’d read about how poorly Churchill had been after he had his stroke,” she recalled. “So I imagined that I was helping him to get well.”

Balakrishnan was an avid watcher of films and TV. In 2001, when Morgan-Davies was nineteen, he saw a trailer for the first “Harry Potter” movie and decided that the boy wizard’s story reflected his own. “I think that he thought he’d let me read the book so that I’d come to understand him better,” Morgan-Davies told me. Later, Balakrishnan saw the final installment of Peter Jackson’s “Lord of the Rings” trilogy. According to Morgan-Davies, he immediately identified with the character of Aragorn, the long-lost heir to the throne of Gondor. “He let me read that as well, because it was part of his self-promotion,” Morgan-Davies said. But she drew her own conclusions about the texts. “I started to see that the way Bala was behaving, the way he was talking, doesn’t sound like Harry and Aragorn at all. It sounds like Voldemort and Sauron. Once I got that idea in my head, I just couldn’t get it out.”

In 2005, when Morgan-Davies was twenty-two, she made her first attempt at escape, slipping out the back door while Balakrishnan was taking one of his long baths and making her way to the local police station. She told the reception officer that she had run away from home. “I didn’t mention the violence, because I didn’t want any trouble for anybody,” she told me; two decades of punishment had instilled in Morgan-Davies a distaste for any kind of retribution. The police, believing the problem to be little more than a family dispute, phoned Balakrishnan and told him to come and collect Morgan-Davies. When they followed up, a few days later, she was forced to take the call from the living room, as the eavesdropping commune stood in a semicircle around her. (Had she been a minor, Hall told me, the police might have asked more questions.)

The cult moved to a new apartment, three miles to the north. There, Morgan-Davies fell into a depression. By New Year’s Day of 2008, she had given up hope. The following August, however, the dynamics in the house changed. Balakrishnan’s sister-in-law was diagnosed with cancer, and Herivel, by then in her late fifties, was required to do more and more work around the house. Morgan-Davies spied an opportunity, and began the three-year process of turning Herivel into an ally. “I used to console her,” she said. “I was just weakening, weakening, working on her. She started getting soft toward me, bit by bit.” Meanwhile, Morgan-Davies’s own health deteriorated. Having carefully watched Pattni’s experience with diabetes, she began to suspect that she was suffering from the same disease. There was no chance of receiving medical treatment, because Balakrishnan forbade it; in 2004, he had allowed another of his followers, Oh Kareng, to die of a head injury she sustained in the house rather than call her an ambulance. “I remember telling Josie in early 2013 that, one way or another, I am going to be out of this cult by the end of 2014,” Morgan-Davies said. “Either as a free person or in a coffin.”

It was Herivel who ultimately arranged for Morgan-Davies’s rescue, using a mobile phone that she secretly bought with the change left over from her grocery allowance. One night in October of 2013, she and Morgan-Davies saw a report on the BBC’s six-o’clock news about forced marriages, which ended with a help-line number flashing onscreen. The women memorized it, and eventually made contact with the Palm Cove Society. A few weeks later, Morgan-Davies and Herivel fled the house while Balakrishnan and his wife were out shopping. Hall and Stocks, who were waiting with a police officer in a parked car near the house, removed them to safety.

Although Herivel’s concern for Morgan-Davies’s health drove her to plan the escape, by the time that Balakrishnan’s trial concluded, in January of this year, she had come to regret her decision. When the guilty verdicts were read out in court, she shouted, “You’re sending an innocent man to prison! Shame on you!” That day, Detective Chief Superintendent Tom Manson of the Metropolitan Police spoke of his hope that the judgment would bring Balakrishnan’s victims “some comfort and, perhaps, closure.” Stocks has a different take. “For me, all of the adults that were in that house from the moment Katy was born are culpable,” she said. “They’re all perpetrators. They are victims as well, of course. Only one went to prison, but to my mind there should have been others.”

Certainly damage has been inflicted that, in Cutler’s estimation, cannot be undone. “There are aspects of Katy’s development that will always impact her,” she said. Yet, when it comes to the appropriate punishment for Balakrishnan’s crimes, Morgan-Davies is magnanimous. She knows that he had to be convicted, she told me, but she doesn’t want him to spend so long in prison. “I was not treated as a human being, so I’m passionate that no one else should ever be treated that way,” Morgan-Davies said. “Even Bala himself.”

Simon Parkin is a contributing writer for newyorker.com and the author of “Death by Video Game: Danger, Pleasure, and Obsession on the Virtual Frontline.”

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/thirty-years-in-captivity

Photos of Women Changing Canada's Most Infamous Polygamist Colony from the Inside

Miriam Chatwin and her youngest daughter collect the morning's eggs in Bountiful, BC.
Miriam Chatwin and her youngest daughter collect
 the morning's eggs in Bountiful, BC.
VICE
Sarah Berman
Photos by Jackie Dives
December 4, 2016


View Photos

In many ways, the story of Bountiful has remained the same for decades.

A fundamentalist sect of Mormons settled in southeastern British Columbia during renowned ghost-consulter Mackenzie King's third stint as prime minister. Since then, the polygamist colony is known to have closed itself off from the world around it, arranged cross-border marriages for girls as young as 12, treated sisterwives like baby factories, and denied kids agency and education—all while refusing to update their personal style past the 19th century.

Canadian journalists have gone so far as to compare the group to the Taliban, and on Monday, Crown prosecutors will deliver closing arguments in a high-profile child trafficking case against one Bountiful leader and two parents. James Oler, Brandon James Blackmore, and Emily Blackmore are accused of taking 13- and 15-year-old girls to Nevada in 2004 to be married and exploited for sexual purposes. The trial marks the first time parents have been held criminally responsible for the group's alleged long-running "child bride pipeline."

No matter which way media attempt to tell this story, there is only one way we understand Bountiful women to be: quiet, obedient, uneducated, covered from head to toe in monochrome pioneer dresses, with hair laced in poofy French braids. Outsiders assume they submit to total brainwashing, control, and even abuse before they're old enough to drive.

This may be how many women and girls continue to live in Bountiful and across dozens of Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS) settlements across North America—but it isn't what caught the eye of photographer Jackie Dives. "I thought it would be more sombre, ritualistic, and dull," she told VICE. "But it was colourful and beautiful."

Visiting on assignment earlier this year, Dives was surprised to meet a group of women who were pushing into leadership positions in the colony's school and land trust, working in offices and hospitals in nearby towns, and unafraid to down a glass of wine or five wearing skinny jeans and oversized sweaters. They were outspoken and educated, and claimed to be bolstering education opportunities and preaching democratic principles within the deeply religious compound.

"There was a time when our school was not a certified school," Mary Jayne Blackmore, daughter of charged polygamist leader Winston Blackmore, told VICE over drinks. Bountiful's independent school, where Mary Jayne pushed for provincial accreditation, will receive over a half-million in government funding this year. "That was one thing that weighed heavily on me at least, because if kids aren't having education and an opportunity, that is limiting them."

The Bountiful women VICE spoke to were all excommunicated from the followers of now-convicted pedophile prophet Warren Jeffs more than a decade ago (a traumatic rift dubbed "the split"), and now follow a less fundamental path. In some cases that's meant divorcing their husbands and steering their own children away from the sect's marriage-centric culture. Though they married early, none of the half-dozen women VICE spoke to identify as victims.

Depending on your perspective, these women are either reforming the reclusive community from the inside, or mounting a public relations front to deflect heat from their leader (and close relative) Winston Blackmore.

With polygamists now on trial in Canada, Dives looked into the day-to-day lives of these Bountiful women who appear to defy stereotypes. But she's also careful not to excuse serious allegations. "Winston is charged with polygamy and there are three others charged with trafficking children," she told VICE. "That's in the courts right now."

"With this photo series, I'm not trying to say that's not a thing. This is just my take on what I experienced while I was up there. It's just a different part of what's happening up there—it's multifaceted, it's not just one thing happening."

Follow Sarah Berman on Twitter.

Follow Jackie Dives on Instagram.

http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/photos-of-women-changing-canadas-most-infamous-polygamist-colony-from-the-inside

How to talk someone out of a damaging cult

The Conversation
December 2, 2016
Rod Dubrow-Marshall -Professor of Social Psychology and Visiting Fellow, Criminal Justice Hub, University of Salford
Linda Dubrow-Marshall -Lecturer in Applied Psychology, University of Salford


Disclosure statement

Rod Dubrow-Marshall is a member of the board of directors of the International Cultic Studies Association and is co-editor of the International Journal of Cultic Studies (www.icsahome.com). Rod also co-founded the Re-Entry Therapy, Information and Referral Network (RETIRN) UK which offers advice and counseling to individuals and families affected by harmful groups or relationships (www.retirn.com).

Linda Dubrow-Marshall is a member of the Advisory Board of the International Cultic Studies Association and co-founded the Re-Entry Therapy, Information and Referral Network (RETIRN) UK which offers advice and counseling to individuals and families affected by harmful groups or relationships (www.retirn.com). Linda is a registered accredited counselor/psychotherapist with the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy and a registered counseling and clinical psychologist with the Health and Care Professions Council.


Many of you will know someone who has suddenly fallen head over heels in love with someone. Some will know people who have done likewise – but for a strange religion or group that you’ve never heard of. What do you say to them? How can you help? And how do you express your concern or surprise at their change of appearance or lifestyle and their utter devotion to someone or something that, to you, seems really crazy?

It’s a question we’ve thought about a lot. We have spent decades talking to current and former members of all kinds of cults, from religious-based groups like the Branch Davidians to political groups on the far right and far left and even psychotherapy cults like the Center For Feeling Therapy. We wanted to understand the attraction of these organisations – and why they’re so hard to leave.

The first thing to realise is that people in cults are not crazy but are the same intelligent, creative and interesting individuals they were before. As with falling in love they are just crazy about the group, its amazing leader and its great potential to change the world and them with it. So the ideals of the group are probably quite attractive superficially – ending war and poverty, say, or promoting the healthy development of brain and body. After all, you don’t see many adverts saying “join this damaging cult that will destroy your life”.

Your friend or loved one has probably fallen hook line and sinker for the positive message of the group and their whole identity is now focused on this message. The key thing to remember is that criticising the group, however strange or damaging it seems to you, is the same as criticising your friend or family member themselves. They love the group really deeply – for all intents and purposes, they are the group.

Think back to when you fell in love for the first time and got those disapproving looks or critical comments from your parents or friends. Remember how angry that made you feel? And how determined you were to love the person all the more.

The most important piece of advice is to not criticise, condemn or judge, even if you have serious concerns. Instead, focus on why this person identifies with the group so much, and what they believe they are getting from it. And try to reinforce the message: “It’s great that you’re developing yourself and your skills so positively and that the group is making you so happy.”

It may feel cheesy, but the point of this approach is to draw on the psychological technique of motivational interviewing, so that these positive statements, similar to those the person has made themselves, will eventually lead them to question whether they are really true – we call this the “strategic and personal oriented dialogue” approach. This means you have to keep talking. Keep the dialogue going and help your loved one measure the group against their own hopes and standards. In time, the scales will start to fall from their eyes, and you can be ready for that moment.

In truth, damaging cults are often run by charlatans. They offer world peace and the promised land while actually sucking people in, taking over their minds and unduly influencing them to give up their time, money, families and careers without any tangible results. Nirvana is always just around the corner, and cults coerce their members to work ever harder to get to the impossible.

Often members are made to feel unworthy and are humiliated. They can never measure up to the ideals and perfection of the leader, and bit by bit their hopes for what the group offers start to crumble. Remind them, supportively, that it’s great they’re moving forward with their life so positively in the group, and the penny will suddenly drop – “I’m actually not having a good time at all … what on earth am I doing?” Crucially, they will have come to this painful realisation themselves – with your help, but without you forcing it on them.

When what seems like the most loving group of individuals with the best ideas ever turns out to be a really big mistake, it is very hard and sometimes humiliating for cult members to admit to the outside world that they were wrong.

This is where you come in again: be there as the unconditionally loving and caring friend or family member that you really are. Where the cult judges and condemns its members, you will be there as the person who says:

Sure, it is a crazy destructive group, but I understand why you got involved. We all fall for con artists and swindlers once in a while – you still have a lot to offer and I can help you move on with your life.


After the cult, the world can seem a bleak and less exciting place. But, with the help of family and friends, the former member can build a new and more authentic life and purpose. Hang in there and you’ll be what they really do need at the end of the rainbow.

Linda and Rod Dubrow-Marshall discuss their work on cults in The Conversation’s latest podcast The Anthill 7: On belief.

http://theconversation.com/how-to-talk-someone-out-of-a-damaging-cult-68930

Dec 3, 2016

CultNEWS101 Articles: 12/4/2016

cult news

The film debuts at 8 p.m. and replays at 9:55 p.m. ET Saturday, Dec. 3, on CNN.

The Sweat Lodge Tragedy

On Oct. 8, 2009, Ray and his Sedona retreat participants packed themselves, skin-against-skin, into that 415-sq.-ft. makeshift sweat lodge meant to push them through their limits and cleanse mind and body. He promised “the most intense heat you’ve ever experienced, I can guarantee you that,” according to a recording of the event made by his staff.

But as wave after wave of hot rocks were brought inside, people were overcome. Two died at the scene; 19 were hospitalized, including a third person who died later.

http://www.cultnews101.com/2016/12/new-cnn-documentary-examines-new-age.html



"In this episode of The Anthill, a podcast from The Conversation, we’re taking a critical look at the idea of belief. You might not consider yourself to be religious or have a particularly clear cut belief system. But, make no mistake, belief permeates everything we do.

For most, the simple belief that the sun will rise every day means not living in fear of the apocalypse. Yet this isn’t the case for everyone. History is replete with doomsday cults, predicting or ushering in the end of the world. To find out why these cults and others are so effective at sucking people in, we speak to psychologists Linda and Rod Dubrow-Marshall who have spent years investigating their popularity."



The troubled teen or "tough love" industry is made up mostly of for-profit companies that promise to fix drug addiction, mental illness, and attitude problems. At the center of this industry are the behavioral programs, some accused of abusive practices and even causing the death of teen clients. If the behavioral program is the entrée, then the transportation service is the appetizer, often setting the tone for the treatment the young person will endure for the months or years to come.

"The activities of the "very middle class" messianic free-love sect, established in 1846, scandalised 19th and early 20th century society.

"Sex obsessed" former C of E clergyman, John Hugh Smyth-Piggot, declared himself the "new messiah" of the cult in 1902 following the death of its founder."


"Radio-Canada also heard allegations that a five-year-old boy from a Quebec congregation was made to repeat his story in front of the man he said abused him. The boy's mother told Enquête the allegations were dismissed because the child did not have a second witness to the alleged assault."



"Brother XII and the cult he created just south of Nanaimo, the Aquarian Foundation, features conspiracy, fraud, adultery, and treasure. Lots of treasure. In fact, this treasure might still be hidden somewhere around this island."




"Swami Nithyananda, the controversial self-styled godman of Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam in Bidadi, faced the fury of local residents at Melkote in the district on Wednesday after some of his devotees allegedly “spoilt the sanctity” of the historical Sri Cheluva Narayanaswamy Temple."



"Sufism is a mystical branch of Islam that is fairly unpopular throughout the Muslim world. Sufis have an unorthodox approach that focuses more on esoteric aspects of religious life, and strive for direct, personal experiences with God."

"The site is titled, "Leah Remini – Aftermath: After Money." It accuses the former "King of Queens" star of attacking the organization in the media, in a book, and on TV shows for profit."


​​
In a new  A&E docu-series which she executive produced, Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath, Remini interviews former members of the Church of Scientology about their experiences as followers and their lives after leaving the religion.

Remini faced a backlash since publicly parting ways with the organization in 2013, and she hopes to send a message to the church with her series. "You’re not gonna continue to lie to people and abuse people and take their money and their lives," she says in the show.  "If I can stop one, then I’m gonna do it.”



https://m.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/5fjszg/i_am_leah_remini_ask_me_anything_about_scientology/?compact=true


News, Intervention, Recovery

Cults101.org resources about cults, cultic groups, abusive relationships, movements, religions, political organizations and related topics.
Intervention101.com to help families and friends understand and effectively respond to the complexity of a loved one's cult involvement.
CultRecovery101.com assists group members and their families make the sometimes difficult transition from coercion to renewed individual choice.
CultNews101.com news, links, resources.
Flipboard
Twitter
Cults101 Bookstore (500 books/videos)

Selection of articles for CultNEWS101 does not mean that Patrick Ryan or Joseph Kelly agree with the content. We provide information from many points of view in order to promote dialogue.

Please forward articles that you think we should add to CultNEWS101.com.

Thanks

New CNN Documentary Examines New Age Guru James Arthur Ray, Convicted in 3 Deaths in Sweat Lodge Tragedy

James Arthur Ray
James Arthur Ray
People
JEFF TRUESDELL
DECEMBER 2, 2016

In October 2009, James Arthur Ray was atop his game. A best-selling author and spiritual leader — he disdains “self-help guru” — his company had earned $9.4 million the previous year. His books, DVDs and seminars were marketed to those who eagerly embraced his philosophy of personal growth by confronting and learning from their fears.

Watch Video

He was catapulted to prominence after appearing in the hugely popular 2006 self-help movie The Secret. Oprah interviewed him on back-to-back shows. Couples paid more than $100,000 per year to join an exclusive circle with one-on-one access to him. When he charged $9,695 apiece for clients to attend a five-day retreat in the scrublands outside of Sedona, Arizona, some 60 people signed up.

But then three people died in Sedona as part of a sweat lodge exercise Ray led, and everything collapsed — as revisited in the documentary Enlighten Us: The Rise and Fall of James Arthur Ray. The film explores questions not only of Ray’s personal responsibility, but of the needs and responsibilities of those who seek to be led.

The film debuts at 8 p.m. and replays at 9:55 p.m. ET Saturday, Dec. 3, on CNN.

The Sweat Lodge Tragedy

On Oct. 8, 2009, Ray and his Sedona retreat participants packed themselves, skin-against-skin, into that 415-sq.-ft. makeshift sweat lodge meant to push them through their limits and cleanse mind and body. He promised “the most intense heat you’ve ever experienced, I can guarantee you that,” according to a recording of the event made by his staff.

But as wave after wave of hot rocks were brought inside, people were overcome. Two died at the scene; 19 were hospitalized, including a third person who died later.

Ray, 59, was convicted of negligent homicide and sentenced to two years in prison.

Three years after finishing his time, Ray tells PEOPLE: “I believe totally and completely that we all must take full and complete responsibility for our lives, and I have taken full and complete control and responsibility for the situation that occurred.

“My work was never on trial,” he says. “The tragedy was on trial. The jury found absolutely no shred of evidence of intentional misconduct or harm. It was a tragic accident, and it was determined to be negligent, and because three people died, it was determined to be criminally negligent.”

“I repented, I grieved, I anguished, and I finally got my head back on and began studying my craft and how I was going to utilize that to better my own life, and also to better the lives of those people I’m blessed to serve,” he says.

“The ‘comeback’ and the ‘be back’ and the ‘I am back’ is here. A lot of what that entails is me processing for myself exactly what occurred, and going through that process of responsibility, redemption, and then moving toward resilience.”

In the film, which premiered earlier this year at the TriBeCa Film Festival, family members of those who died object to Ray’s return to the work he was doing when those three lives were lost. “I still think he’s dangerous,” says one, who is unidentified, “because he doesn’t understand that his actions actually made these deaths inevitable.”
A Case Study in Charisma

Filmmaker Jenny Carchman does not otherwise include interviews with relatives of Liz Neuman, 49, a mother of three who worked on Ray’s events; James Shore, 40, a father of three; and Kirby Anne Brown, 38, a decorative artist. (After Brown died, her family created an organization, SEEK Safely, designed to “educate, empower and promote the public about the unregulated self help industry,”according to the nonprofit’s website.)

Says Carchman, who did meet with Brown’s family while making the documentary: “Their story is so deep and awful and tragic, and so understandably complicated, so much so that it could be an entire film.”

“The grief and the loss of the victims is horrible, but it’s a very separate story than the one we were telling,” she tells PEOPLE. Instead, she says she found herself drawn to the topic after reading about Ray’s sentencing, and was pulled into the question of how people could die while on a quest for improvement. Meeting Ray for the first time while he was jailed, “I realized he was such a compelling and very intriguing person that I wanted to follow up.”

In reviewing videos of Ray giving lectures and seminars at his peak, “he was very dynamic and alive and controlled and groomed … jumping around the stage and full of energy and a big personality,” compared to the scattered, scared and tearful man she first encountered. “He was both full of himself, and also denigrating. You see someone who was really lost,” she says. “I kept thinking about a boxer out of the ring.”

Carchman spent two years tracking Ray on his search as he redefines and reclaims his purpose. But she also interviews several of Ray’s former clients and supporters, some of whom attended the fateful Sedona retreat, to provide a first-person look inside the sweat lodge exercise and its aftermath, when Ray — on the advice of an attorney, he says — fled and left his followers abandoned.

In the film, Ray says: “I had gone back to my room, and I was like still not all together, ’cause I’ve just run this serious marathon on the tail end of an extremely emotionally taxing week already. And so I get in the shower, and when I get out, there’s a rap on my door, and it’s the police.”

At another point he says: “When they told me there were people in serious distress, I was like, what? I was in shock. … I mean, my entire life completely collapsed within the period of about 15 minutes.”

He tells the filmmaker: “In my mind it’s like, ‘investigating this as a homicide,’ you might get arrested, attorney’s saying get out of there — I mean, what would you do?”

Ray fought criminal charges that initially included manslaughter, for which the jury found him not guilty while still faulting him for negligent homicide.

At his sentencing the judge said: “The evidence from the trial and presentence proceedings show that Mr. Ray, as misguided as he was, believed he was helping people. And the evidence is that people believed they were being helped. … The court is still left to wonder, how is it that so many educated, knowledgeable people ignored basic common sense?”
Ray: ‘It Had to Happen’

Carchman’s film contains a startling conclusion from Ray, who is asked by the filmmaker how the tragedy could have happened.

Although he is seen giving a teary apology in court, and emotionally referencing the event in small-scale seminars as he begins again to court clients, Ray answers: “It had to happen, because it was the only way I could experience and learn and grow through the things that I’ve done. … You come out of a situation like this and you’re either bitter and angry, or you’re more awake and grateful, and I choose awake and grateful, and I choose to see it as a test of character, and a test through fire, and I think I did OK.”

Asked by PEOPLE what he has done for the families of those who died, Ray says: “I’ve done everything that’s been asked of me. I’ve served my time, I paid restitution, I reached out to them, contrary to what was reported. I received mixed response from that reaching out.” He explains further: “I received an order, a legal document, when I was in custody stating that if I was to contact them in any way, there would be legal ramifications. I’ve respected that and honored that and I’ve abided by the law.”

“I’m not ignoring what happened,” he says. “Just the opposite. In fact, I’m using it to help make everyone I engage with the very best they can be. I can talk to a lot larger audience from a broader perspective of experience today than I ever could before.”

But he is no longer on the road 250 days a year. Gone is the 7,500-sq.-ft. Beverly Hills mansion with the home gym and movie theater, on which he had fallen months behind in payments prior to his sentencing. He emerged from prison in debt. Divorced and single since before his rise to fame, he lives now in a 1,600-sq.ft., three bedroom condo in the Hollywood Hills. He coaches clients online, and makes far fewer personal appearances than he once did.

“Im exactly where I should be, and I must be,” the son of an Oklahoma minister tells PEOPLE. “My career is not a career for me, it’s a calling, and I say that very much with conviction. I never aspired to be a self-help guru. How I see myself is as a catalyst. I’m a catalyst to action, to help people stop dreaming and start doing.”

He is slightly critical of the film, and says he expected it to be a deeper examination of the legal system that came after him. But he says he’s never lost regard for those who died.

“People who invest in themselves are like professional athletes,” he says. “Around the legal issues, there’s a whole other story that is not told in the documentary, not covered in the press, glossed over at the trial. The judge didn’t want to hear it; the jury didn’t want to hear it.”

“I believed without a doubt that we were all safe,” he says. “I again take full and complete responsibility for the accident. I conceived of the exercise; we all believed in it. I led it, but I also participated in it. I didn’t anticipate what happened.”

“Sure, we all did something that was extreme. I fully know that Liz Neuman, James Shore and Kirby Brown are not victims — they’re heroes.”

“James, Liz and Kirby were there for a reason. It’s a reason we all have. It’s compelling people to do more, to be more, and to become more. They were totally and completely committed to that end. And so to me, that’s heroic. I think it’s disrespectful to their memory to label them as victims. I honor them. I hold them in the highest regard, and if their life is going to continue to have meaning — which, if I have anything to do with it, it will — then I believe the story needs to be told from their heroic position rather than a victim position.”

http://people.com/crime/new-cnn-documentary-examines-new-age-guru-james-arthur-ray-convicted-in-3-deaths-in-sweat-lodge-tragedy/


Jehovah's Witnesses booth raising eyebrows at Toronto book fair

The Jehovah's Witnesses have set up a booth at the 24th annual Salon du Livre de Toronto French Book Fair in Toronto.
Devin Heroux
CBC News
December 3, 2016

Students attending the 24th annual Salon du Livre de Toronto book fair are getting the chance to pick out their favourite novels, but they're also being exposed to free literature from the Jehovah's Witnesses.

For the fourth consecutive year, the organizers of the book fair have allowed the Jehovah's Witnesses to have a booth.

But this year, people are raising concerns about a religious group being at the book fair, which is being held at the Toronto Reference Library on Yonge Street north of Bloor Street.

"Someone asked me why Jehovah Witness? I answered, why not Jehovah Witness," the charr of the book fair, Valery Vlad, said.

But some people who were at the fair Thursday disagreed with Vlad.
'It's very bizarre'

It's very bizarre. It doesn't go with a book fair," Alexandre Garneau told Radio-Canada reporter Mathieu Simard in French.

"It's not really the place for it. I think religion should be in the home or at church," said author Viateur Lefrançois, who also spoke to Simard in French.

The book fair runs until Saturday and Vlad told CBC Toronto the religious group is here for the remainder of the event.

However, he said people at the Jehovah's Witnesses booth are not allowed to actively encourage students to take a book; students have to ask to receive the free literature, instead.

"They stay at the booths and don't have the right to offer you a book, for example," Vlad said.

"From a school board perspective we have to talk to the parents and let them know that it's possible their child might come home with a book they might not be in favour of because of their own faith," said Conseil scolaire Viamonde director of communications and marketing Claire Francoeur.
Case-by-case situation

Francouer said she's called all the principals with the board, asking them if students have picked up a Jehovah's Witnesses book and that they'll be dealing with each student on a case-by-case situation.

"It's not the way that we're doing it," said Francoeur. "Usually there's always an adult beside them to explain what is what and how things are and make sure they understand the difference between different faiths."

As a public school board, Francoeur said they don't shy away from discussing different religions. She does have concerns however that some younger students might not be aware of what type of book they're picking up for free.

"If the students do have the book we'll explain to them what the faith is and what the difference is between other faiths."

About 7,000 students will attend during the four-day book fair. Throughout the event students have the chance to pick out some of their favourite novels and talk with authors.

Vlad said he also hopes that students start thinking about books as gifts. In some cases, though, Vlad said he has seen students wrapping up Jehovah Witness books for their parents.

"For me, it's necessary to give a booth to every group who wants to present books, religion or not."

The book fair board of directors is expected to decide in January whether or not the religious group will be allowed back next year.

"Personally, I'd say yes. I'd allow them. But it's not me who decides but the board," Vlad said.

But Francoeur isn't so sure.

"I doubt they will continue to have one, because the book fair people told me they had a lot of questions. Not from us, but other people," she said.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/jehovah-witness-controversy-book-fair-1.3877847

Dec 2, 2016

Deals reached for some defendants in polygamous food-stamp-fraud case, lawyers say

Members of the FLDS Church walk to Federal Court in Salt Lake City
NATE CARLISLE
The Salt Lake Tribune
December 2, 2016

Courts » Lawyers also say at least two plan to plead guilty.

Federal prosecutors have offered plea agreements to most of the 11 polygamous sect members accused of defrauding the food stamp program, lawyers said Thursday, and have given some of the defendants a chance to plead guilty to only a misdemeanor and avoid prison.

At least two of the defendants, Kimball Dee Barlow and Ruth Barlow, plan to plead guilty, their respective attorneys said Thursday.

"It's anticipated he will accept a plea offer, yes," said Barlow's attorney, Rudy J. Bautista.

Bautista, like other defense attorneys involved in the case — if they spoke at all Thursday — declined to discuss specifics of the plea agreement for fear that the deal could fall apart before it is entered in court.

Bautista said his understanding was that prosecutors at the U.S. attorney's office in Utah have offered deals to everyone except Lyle Jeffs, a former bishop in the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints who absconded from home confinement in June.

The U.S. attorneys office, through spokeswoman Melodie Rydalch, declined to to comment Thursday.

Aric Cramer, who represents defendant Kristal M. Dutson, said she is pondering whether to accept a plea agreement.

Cramer declined to say what Dutson was offered, but he said federal prosecutors have given at least some defendants the chance to plead guilty to a misdemeanor.

Those defendants would not have to go to jail or prison, Cramer said, nor would they have to pay any restitution or testify against co-defendants.

"It's an amazing offer," Cramer said. "I have never seen in 27 years of practice a federal prosecutor offer a misdemeanor after filing felonies."

Cramer said he had heard from other attorneys that the misdemeanor offers were made to defendants whom the government did not consider leaders in the FLDS. The leaders, including Seth Jeffs, who led the FLDS congregation in South Dakota, and former FLDS bishop John Wayman, received offers allowing them to plead to more serious offenses, which were still less harsh than the two counts of conspiracy with which all defendants were indicted in February, Cramer and other attorneys said Thursday.

Prosecutors "kind of have this thing: 'It doesn't really matter what you've done. If your name is Jeffs, you're just evil and we're going to treat you as such,' " Cramer said.

Defense attorney Ryan Stout, who represents Ruth Barlow, confirmed that she will plead guilty. He declined to specify whether she will plead guilty to the misdemeanor charge or the stiffer offense reserved for the leaders.

"Well, she's not considered one of the head honchos, I'll give you that," Stout said.

Cramer said prosecutors gave defendants a Friday deadline to accept the deals. All 11 defendants are scheduled for trial on Jan. 30.

They were indicted in February, each with one count of conspiracy to defraud the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and one count of conspiracy to launder money. Prosecutors say FLDS leaders required sect members to turn over to the church their SNAP cards or the food purchased with them, and in some cases SNAP benefits were used at church-controlled stores and converted to cash.

Offers to plead guilty to lesser or fewer charges are a common tactic in the criminal justice system. Cramer said the offers here are not necessarily a sign that the government has weak cases, but perhaps that prosecutors pursued indictments too soon.

Prosecutors and the FBI accumulated terabytes of evidence and have missed multiple deadlines to sort that evidence and provide it to the defense.

"It's a very sloppy investigation," Cramer said. "It's a very sloppy case."

Former FLDS members have watched the case in hopes it would dismantle the sect, whose president, Warren Jeffs, is already serving a prison sentence in Texas for sexually abusing two underage girls he married. He is a brother to Lyle and Seth Jeffs.

A half-brother, Wallace Jeffs, on Thursday said he was OK with the lesser defendants pleading guilty to the misdemeanors, but said the FLDS leadership needs to go to prison.

Anything less is "another slap on the wrist to these guys," Wallace Jeffs said, "and they'll just keep doing what they've always done."

ncarlisle@sltrib.com

Twitter: @natecarlisle

http://www.sltrib.com/home/4659633-155/deals-reached-for-some-defendants-in?fullpage=1

Dera Radha Soami Sect Chief's relative found murdered


Press Trust of India
Amritsar
December 2, 2016

A close relative of Dera Radha Soami Sect Chief Gurinder Singh Dhillon's was found murdered in Maqbool Road, a plush area, here.

Shukla Seth (83) was found murdered last night along with her maid Manjit Kaur (60) at the former's residence, police said.

Seth is the mother-in-law of Dhillon's elder son.

Dhillon, who has Z-plus security, arrived here in the morning and attended the cremation of Seth at Durgiana cremation ground.

He spent nearly one hour in the cremation ground amid tight security.

Last rites of Seth were performed as per Hindu rituals. 'Havan Yagya' was also organised and Dhillon participated in all the rituals

Earlier in the morning, when Dhillon arrived in the city, he asked his personal staff to manage the autopsy of the Seth and spent the day in the city till evening.

Dera Radha Soami also known as Dera Baba Jaimal Singh at Beas town, nearly 45 km from the Amritsar city, is headed by the sect chief Dhillon. The sect has a large number of followers across the country.

http://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/dera-radha-soami-sect-chief-s-relative-found-murdered-116120201165_1.html

Trial shines light on secretive FLDS community

Gail Blackmore and James Oler along with Brandon Blackmore

Trevor Crawley
Cranbrook Daily Townsman
December 1, 2016


The trial for a trio of Bountiful members facing alleged child trafficking charges has been adjourned until closing arguments begin in Cranbrook Supreme Court on Monday.

The Crown's case in front of Justice Paul Pearlman concluded on Tuesday, with the accused choosing not to mount a defence.

James Oler, Brandon Blackmore and Emily Blackmore are charged with alleged removal of child from Canada, under a criminal code subsection that their removal would facilitate sexual interference or invitation to sexual touching.

At the heart of the trial are two children who were removed from the polygamous Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saint (FLDS) community of Bountiful, one hour west of Cranbrook near Creston, and married to men in the United States.

The marriages of the girls, who were 13- and 15-years-old at the time, occurred in 2004. Their ages are confirmed by birth certificates — their identities are protected by a publication ban.

According to priesthood records seized by police during a raid on an FLDS compound in Texas, the 13-year-old girl was married to Warren Jeffs, the leader and prophet of the FLDS, on March 1, 2004, as one of seven marriages conducted that day. The record lists Brandon Blackmore as a witness.

The second child, 15, was married to James Leroy Johnson on June 25, 2004, in one of 18 weddings that day, with the record listing James Oler as one of the witnesses.

In his opening statement, Crown counsel Peter Wilson, a special prosecutor appointed by the B.C. government, admitted the case will be challenging for the judge to consider, given that the indictment deals with unusual and rarely pursued charges with 'no area in jurisprudence that has similar cases.'

The Warren Jeffs connection

Witness testimony from former FLDS members throughout the trial has shed light on what life was like — especially for women — while growing up in Bountiful.

From a family structure point of view, children and wives are instructed to obey the priesthood head — the paternal figure of the family. The men are taught to unflinchingly follow the instructions of the prophet, the FLDS leader, who they believe receive divine revelations from the Lord.

Women are instructed to dress conservatively, while wearing their hair in a manner approved by the priesthood head, all while living a creed to 'keep sweet' and be happy, without giving rise to anger or emotional outbursts.

Witnesses also testified that the FLDS doctrine of plural marriage — polygamy — is necessary to achieve the highest glory in Heaven and that the role of married women is to bear children, which are inhabited by celestial spirits at conception.

Warren Jeffs, the leader of the FLDS, is currently serving a life prison sentence delivered in a Texas courtroom following his conviction on two counts of sexual assault of a child.

He was previously convicted of similar charges and sentenced to 10 years to life in Utah; however, that conviction was overturned in 2010.

Jeffs took over leadership of the FLDS in 2002, following the death of his father, Rulon, who had previously headed up the fundamentalist organization.

That had a direct impact on life in Bountiful.

After Rulon died, a power struggle emerged between Warren Jeffs and Winston Blackmore, who were both vying for the FLDS leadership.

Witnesses testified that families were torn apart as the community divided to stand behind their preferred candidate.

Warren Jeffs eventually took over the FLDS leadership and promptly excommunicated Winston Blackmore, installing James Oler as bishop of the Bountiful community.

To this day, Bountiful remains divided, with rival factions urged not to communicate with each other.

http://www.cranbrooktownsman.com/breaking_news/404052106.html

Ku Klux Klan embraces Trump — but mistrusts the alt-right’s lack of Christianity


AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE
December 2, 2016

Don't miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

In the wake of Donald Trump’s victory and the recent rise of the white nationalist “alt-right,” a 150-year-old racist group has been spreading its wings: the Ku Klux Klan, which on Saturday is planning its first post-election rally.

“Our membership grows by the day,” said Gary Munker, who identifies himself as a spokesman for the group. The Klan, since its creation in 1866, has called for a white and Christian America; historically, it has resorted to lynchings and racial violence as the means to its end.

Like the former KKK leader David Duke, who supported Trump’s candidacy — and was eventually disavowed by the New York billionaire — Munker says he was drawn by the Republican candidate’s language, particularly his attacks against immigrants and his talk of deporting millions.

The movement was born in the devastated states of the South in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War, just three years after President Abraham Lincoln ordered all slaves in the South to be freed.

Munker, wearing one of the group’s emblematic hooded white robes, claimed that his branch of the KKK — the Loyal White Knights — has 700 members on Long Island, where he lives, and an additional 500 in the rest of New York state.

Munker, 36, who calls himself a family man, said people were beginning to “wake up” to what is happening in the country.

He said that he joined the Loyal White Knights — one of 40 local or regional groups making up the Klan — five years ago after seeing his quiet and “essentially white” neighborhood change seemingly overnight with the arrival of subsidized housing units and a much more diverse population.

– No resurgence –

Munker, who was vague about his full-time profession for fear he might lose his job, is an active member of the Klan: a native of a rural part of Long Island, he regularly distributes tracts in nearby cities in an effort to draw new members.

The last time he did this was on November 17, in a parking lot in the village of Patchogue, which entered the dark annals of American racism after a group of high school students taunted and punched and then murdered an Ecuadoran immigrant in 2008.

The discovery of Munker’s leaflets prompted some 200 local residents to organize a rally against racism the following Sunday.

Far from the killings or the burning crosses that made the Klan’s grim reputation, leafleting is now the Klan’s chief activity in 14 states and “gives them an extensive geographical reach,” said Carla Hill, an investigative researcher with the Center on Extremism of the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish group dedicated to fighting intolerance.

The latest available data, she said, does not point to a resurgence of the movement, whatever Gary Munker might say: 74 instances of KKK leafleting have been counted so far this year, compared to 86 in 2015.

The Loyal White Knights have announced plans for a rally Saturday in North Carolina, without confirming the exact time or place.

But even if it does take place, Carla Hill said, it is unlikely to attract much more of a crowd than the Klan’s last several demonstrations, which rarely drew more than a few dozen participants.

– ‘Political space’ –

For Mark Potok, a specialist at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors extremism in the US, even if so-called white nationalism has undeniably gained prominence since the arrival of Barack Obama as the first black US president, the movement appears unlikely to take on significant momentum.

Klan membership is no more than 6,000 today, he noted, compared to 40,000 in the 1960s and several million in the 1920s.

Still, proponents of white superiority feel that Trump’s election has given them “a political space to present their views as legitimate,” Potok said, adding that “they have not been taken that seriously in 50 years.”

Thus, a conference November 20 in the federally owned Ronald Reagan Building in Washington gathered some 250 white supremacists, some of whom raised their arms in a Nazi-like salute to their far-right leader Richard Spencer — and to Trump’s victory.

But these “intellectual” extremists, who refer to their movement as the alt-right,” “look down on the Klan,” Potok said.

For the Klan, with its dark history of violence, “can’t make the claim like Richard Spencer that ‘we are standing up for the rights of white people (but) we don’t hate anybody,'” said Potok.

But Munker said he mistrusts the smooth talkers of the alt-right:

“We are Christians (while) they let anybody in — and just that makes me wonder about their integrity,” he said.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/12/ku-klux-klan-embraces-trump-but-mistrusts-the-alt-rights-lack-of-christianity/

Descendants of 'sex-obsessed' leader of Victorian cult that scandalised society lose claim for £1m

John Hugh Smyth-Pigott, a 'sex-obsessed' former Church of England clergyman who declared himself the 'new messiah' of the sect
Telegraph
Danny Boyle
DECEMBER 1, 2016


Sordid claims about a free-love Victorian cult have been analysed by a High Court judge as he ruled that the granddaughters of the sect's former leader will not see any of the £1million they claimed as their birthright.

The "very middle class" Agapemonite messianic movement scandalised 19th and early 20th century society after being established in 1846.

Named after the Greek word meaning "Abode of Love", it was described as the prototype of modern-day cults, complete with sex scandals, accusations of brainwashing, dramatic rescues of members by their families, moral outrage from respectable society and condemnation in the popular press.

John Hugh Smyth-Piggot, a "sex-obsessed" former Church of England clergyman, declared himself the "new messiah" of the sect in 1902 following the death of its founder, Henry Prince.

As "heavenly bridegroom", detractors claimed he had enjoyed a harem of dozens of "soul brides" eager for his favour. His declaration as Godhead, claiming he was the " essential being of God", caused riotous scenes in London, with Smyth-Piggott having to be removed from the capital under armed guard.

Smyth-Piggot has since been described as "if not a sexual maniac, at least a man obsessed with sex in his daily life".

Despite his claim to immortality, Smyth-Piggot - who was known to his followers simply as "Beloved" - died in 1927 and the cult faded into obscurity and folded in 1956. But left behind was about £1 million from the sale of the cult's last place of worship - the Church of the Arc of the Covenant, in Clapton, East London.

His great-granddaughter spearheaded a legal bid by his six granddaughters to come into the money they saw as rightfully theirs. But now Judge Andrew Simmonds QC has sent them away empty handed, ruling that the money must go to charity.

He said it was not his role to pass moral judgment on the Agapemonites, adding that his decision that the cult was a charity "reflects the long tradition of religious tolerance in this country".

The Charity Commission will now distribute the money among other good causes which, in their view, most closely resemble the Agapemonites.

The Agapemonite movement was founded by Prince, a defrocked clergyman, who set up a base in the quiet Somerset village of Spaxton, using money gleaned by urging his followers - mostly wealthy, unmarried women - to hand over all their worldly goods to build "The Abode of Love".

The result was a collection of houses and cottages with its own chapel surrounded by a 12ft wall and guarded by dogs. The cult later expanded and founded other centres, including the Church of the Arc of the Covenant, complete with stained glass windows depicting the submission of womankind to man.

It was there that Smyth-Piggot declared himself to be the "second coming of Christ" in September 1902, before a 6,000 strong crowd. Contemporary reports detail how, while his followers abased themselves, many of the crowd reacted so angrily to his claim that he was run out of town under police escort and afterwards retreated to the sect's Somerset base.

The church was sold in 2010 and uncertainty over the destination of the £1m proceeds prompted the trustees to seek the High Court's guidance.

The money was passed into the hands of trustees, according to the directions of an 1892 trust deed, which stated the funds should be held and distributed by them in order to "promote Agapemonite objectives in such manner as they see fit". However, when it was drawn up no one envisaged a time when the sect and its members would have long died.

As Smyth-Piggott was the last survivor of the original trustees, the claimants said the money from the church sale should go to them.

Rachel Phillips, the great-granddaughter of Smyth-Piggott, also of Dunkeswell, Devon, appeared before the judge in London. But she was philosophical outside court, saying: "What will be will be."

Judge Simmonds ruled that Agapemonites who contributed to the church-building fund intended to endow the movement and never contemplated that individuals would benefit from their generosity.

The decision leaves the Charity Commission with the task of deciding which good causes most closely mirror the objectives of the Agapemonites. The granddaughters' legal costs will be paid out of the trust fund.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/01/descendants-sex-obsessed-leader-victorian-cult-scandalised-society/