Mar 4, 2017

Peter Popoff, the Born-Again Scoundrel

Peter Popoff
Peter Popoff
MARK OPPENHEIMER
GQ
February 28, 2017

Once, Peter Popoff was a magical, mystical man of God—a giant among '80s televangelists. And Lord, was he rich! But he was also an enormous fraud who was ruined in scandal. Ah, but here in America, time absolves all that. And if a fellow is clever enough, he can remake his kingdom and amass quite a fortune. For the Lord worketh in mysterious ways.

He came to me when I least expected. I was in a hotel bed, enrobed in terry cloth, my teeth brushed, my hand aloft holding the remote. This was a year ago, and the soft glow of cable TV was the room's only light. I was flitting between channels when I happened upon BET. There I saw an old white man preaching to an audience of elderly black people. And as I wondered what on earth this pasty alter kocker was doing on black TV, it came to me: I had seen this man before.

It had been years, and he had changed some: a few more wrinkles, a little hitch in his gait, the hair a bit more aggressively black. But it was him. Peter Popoff was back. And he was as mesmerizing as ever.

Sitting on a stage, in an upholstered chair, Popoff implored his television audience to call an 800 number so that he could send them a secret “faith tool” that God had recently given him as he was “praying about the four red moons of this year of Jubilee.” If that wasn't incentive enough, there was more reason to reach for the phone. On the screen, below Popoff, flashed the message “Call now for your free miracle spring water.”
As if to answer the very question that occurred to me—what does one do with miracle spring water?—Popoff explained that good times were ahead, very good times. “I can see God leading people into new homes, new automobiles!… God gives supernatural debt cancellation!… And I'd like to send you the miracle spring water.”

The show cut to video of Popoff working a room of sick, elderly African-Americans. “Is that your cane?” he asked an old woman. “I believe God has given you a divine chiropractic treatment! Amen! Hallelujah! Amen in Jesus's name! You can walk now without the cane. Take a few steps and make the Devil mad!”

The woman stood up, with his help, started shaking her hands, and then, as the organ and drum picked up the tempo, started shaking her hands faster. She never took very many steps, but she vibrated with energy. Popoff yanked her cane away and tossed it up onstage. The scene dissolved to a woman sharing a bit of testimony with Popoff and the crowd. “I took your holy water and put it in my son's shoes,” she said. “I put it in his bed, I put it on his pillow, and my son joined the church and he got saved and he's still in church—and then I got $3,800 and new furniture.”

Such blessings! The prevailing sentiment in the room was Thanks be to God—but also Thanks be to Peter Popoff. He was hugging people, punching the air with them. Everyone had a story: Addictions had disappeared. Appliances had been delivered. All proof of the miracle water's efficacy. And getting off crutches, that was big, too—this is why people needed Popoff's healing touch. “You know where that pain went?” Popoff cried after one healing. “I'll tell you where that pain went. It went back to the pits of hell!”

Staring at the TV, I was transfixed. This was vintage stuff—a sort of resurrection, if you will. Like so many televangelists, Popoff had his heyday in the 1980s, back when preaching on TV was big business—and plenty mainstream. The flamboyant, seemingly pious preachers who solicited cash for enormous, if dubious, ministries were household names. But one by one, they fell to disgrace: Jim Bakker paid off a woman who'd accused him of rape; Jimmy Swaggart was caught with a prostitute at a roadside motel. But none were humiliated quite as publicly as Popoff.

Popoff had been the best at what he did—the boldest and baddest, the most don't-give-a-damn cheesy. He dared you to doubt him, which helped insulate him from charges that he was a fraud. With a promise to heal the sick, Popoff convened huge crowds, where he relied on a shtick that involved calling out the name and ailment of someone in the audience he had never met, as if God had just vouchsafed him the information. “I'm looking for an Ada Mae, and I know that she has kidney problems! Where are you, Ada Mae?”—that sort of thing. (Steve Martin borrowed this bit of Popoff's routine for his 1992 flick Leap of Faith, and Chevy Chase had fun at Popoff's expense in Fletch Lives.)

But a key component of his act eventually spelled his downfall. In 1986, a team of freelance debunkers, including the magician James Randi, took a radio scanner to a Popoff revival, where they overheard Popoff 's wife, Liz, feeding him names and illnesses. Apparently, plants in the audience would chat people up or get them to jot down details, then feed their information to Liz, who passed it on to her husband through an earpiece. Listening through the gizmo in his ear, Popoff would call out to the crowd as if he possessed the omniscience of the Lord.

Randi's tape of the ruse made its way to The Tonight Show, where Johnny Carson—who harbored great disdain for charlatans—exposed Popoff 's technique. The Tonight Show exposé made national news, and in 1987 the Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association filed for bankruptcy. He seemed done for.

Popoff had been the boldest and baddest of televangelists—the most don't-give-a-damn cheesy.

Yet here he was, all these years later, peddling miracle water and his own healing touch to an audience of African-Americans who seemed not to have gotten the memo that he was a mountebank. It appeared to me that Popoff was exploiting more than just American forgetfulness. He was tapping into something far more powerful: our desire to get something for nothing.

Right alongside our Puritan work ethic and entrepreneurial drive runs our instinctive love for the lottery. And in modern Christianity, this yearning for the jackpot has given rise to what's known as the prosperity gospel—the magical thinking that if we give a few bucks, close our eyes, and pray real hard, riches and blessings will be ours. It's the tradition of Joel Osteen, Creflo Dollar, and all the other TV preachers who rose up to take the place of the vanquished buffoons from the 1980s.

He may have once been branded a charlatan, but Popoff could probably see that we never stopped making space in our hearts for a guy like him—a guy who knows what we want to believe. In fact, maybe he realized that today, more than ever, we are primed for what he has to sell. After all, in an age when a TV tycoon can win the White House, vowing to build walls and move markets with sheer chutzpah, there's opportunity for a clever fellow who knows that people running on pure faith fall easily in love with big promises.

What I didn't yet know was the full extent of what the old preacher had gotten himself up to. I wasn't aware yet of the ski vacations or his affinity for tennis or how much he adored his Bentley. I didn't know how it was all funded through a tax-exempt ministry that reaches its flock via live events and a blizzard of mailings, expertly crafted to separate poor people from their money. I had no idea that peddling miracles was, these days, as lucrative as ever.

When I got home, I began devouring episodes of the new Popoff show. I signed up for his mailing list. Almost immediately the letters began to come. The envelopes also included the miracle water or one of various worthless, made-in-China gewgaws: “revelation stones”; red strings that resemble the Kabbalah bracelets Madonna used to wear; and “baruch wallets,” flimsy silver lamé pouches with a slit at the top, in which I was encouraged to insert money to mail back to Popoff. And, of course, everything came with requests for more money: “REMEMBER YOU MUST SOW THE LARGEST BILL YOU HAVE OR THE LARGEST CHECK YOU CAN WRITE.”

I only grew more curious. Why, I wondered, were so many people willing to trust a “prophet” of God who needed an earpiece, and why would they trust his advice on prosperity even after his own financial house had collapsed? I called and sent e-mails to Popoff's organization, People United for Christ, but nobody got back to me. I decided that I'd settle for a glimpse of one of his public crusades, maybe see some people get healed, but I discovered that they weren't advertised. I heard from a veteran Popoff-watcher that the best way to get to one of his shows was to give money—then, if he was planning an event near where you lived, he'd send you a ticket. So I asked friends in ten locales spread across the country to give $10 to Popoff, then sit back and wait for tickets.

I fed my curiosity in the meantime with the broad outline of Popoff's story. I knew he'd been born in 1946 in Germany, where his father, an ethnic Bulgarian, was an evangelical pastor. The family had fled the Communists in 1950, eventually settling in Montclair, California. Popoff was homeschooled after the eighth grade, so he could travel and preach with his father. After graduating from college, Popoff married his wife, Liz, and they embarked on an itinerant life, preaching the Pentecostal gospel across the country. They moved into radio, then television.

In his extracurricular life, Popoff came to see himself, in those Cold War years, as a kind of Christian 007, sneaking Bibles into Communist lands. A photograph in his 1980 memoir, Behind Curtains of Darkness a New Fire Is Blazing, shows Popoff in front of a boat, hair flowing like a Bee Gee's, two Bibles fanned in his left hand. The caption reads: “Peter prepares to drop Bibles into the Black Sea off Istanbul, Turkey. Wrapped in Styrofoam for buoyancy and waterproofing, the Bibles eventually washed up on Communist shores.”

The book makes the claim that Peter was “smuggling thousands of Bibles” into China, and that in Eastern Europe, people would walk 150 miles to hear him preach. Border guards who could have had him arrested let him pass because “they were hungry to know about God.” In 1982 the AP reported on Popoff's use of helium balloons to deliver Bibles and gospel pamphlets from Finland into the Soviet Union.
Religious enthusiasm, as with boy bands, reality TV, and other aspects of pop culture, cycles in and out. After the bankruptcy, Popoff, like some of his fellow Pentecostal preachers, receded somewhat from view. Before long, however, he'd rebranded his ministry as People United for Christ, and he'd reconsidered his audience—this time focusing on African-Americans. “His message hasn't changed,” The Washington Post noted in 1998, “but the audience he is aiming for has.”

The pivot has allowed Popoff to slip from the shadow of his old scandal and, in the years since, quietly rebuild his empire. According to publicly available IRS forms, by 2003, Popoff 's new organization was netting over $9 million a year and Popoff was paying himself and his wife a combined salary of more than half a million dollars a year; their son, daughter, and son-in-law were each netting over a hundred grand. Three years later, revenues for Popoff's ministry were just over $35 million. And according to a document related to his purchase of a Bentley in January 2009, Peter listed his monthly income at $100,000. The couple's 7,300-square-foot house, purchased for $4.5 million in 2007, sits in a gated community in Bradbury, California, and is owned by his church. As a parsonage, it is tax-free.

The actual ministry, though, has been something of a mystery. On paper, Popoff's new outfit hadn't technically been a church—that's because it never had a physical house of worship—but instead functioned as a religious non-profit. But in 2006, it reorganized and aligned itself with a small ministry called Word for the World, which operated out of a tiny storefront church in Farmers Branch, Texas. The apparent oddity of the merger was raised with Popoff in a 2011 deposition when he was asked why an international TV ministry based in California might merge with a minuscule church outside of Dallas. “Our board of directors,” Popoff said, “felt it was in the best interests.” Popoff didn't mention another possible benefit: With this new status, his ministry would no longer be required to disclose its annual income or its salaries to the IRS.

A few months ago, I flew to Texas and tried to visit Word for the World on a Sunday morning, hoping to catch a rousing Pentecostal service. I was surprised when the address for the church I had found online took me to a storefront in an industrial park. The parking lot was deserted, and the building was locked. There was no church sign outside—and certainly no sign of a church inside. Squinting through a window, past venetian blinds, I glimpsed a carpeted foyer, and beyond that, an empty room. This didn't look like a house of worship; it looked like a mailing address. Later, Popoff's people would tell me that the church had recently moved and it was going by a new name now, too. Its new address was just down the road, I discovered, in a strip mall.

If I wasn't going to see a service, I still wanted to visit Popoff's office. His organization, People United for Christ, keeps its headquarters in a suite of white buildings in an industrial section of Upland, California, an hour's drive inland from Los Angeles.

I had expected to be rebuffed. “When they see any media come by, it's a total lockdown on the facility,” I had been told by Crystal Sanchez, age 33, who used to work at Popoff's headquarters. I had found Sanchez after reading The Real Truth Behind People United for Christ, the e-book detailing her time there that she self-published in 2013. “There are cameras surrounding both buildings. If news vans come by, the receptionist or security guy, whoever sees it first, she notified all the top people, letting them know the building is on lockdown.”

Popoff's employees are on guard for more than just the media. Sometimes, Sanchez said, those taken in by Popoff's message would breach security. “This lady came in, and everyone said she was nuts,” Sanchez told me. “She'd sold all her belongings. She had come to talk to Peter.” Popoff didn't come out to meet her; nor did any of his employees.

Sanchez said that when she took the job as a “donation processor,” she thought she might gain new skills while serving God, too. But she soon began to worry that she wasn't really working for a church. “I knew about televangelists,” Sanchez said. “I knew there had been scams. But I had never heard about him before.” Sanchez said that the buildings were essentially big processing centers for cash, checks, and valuables. On her second day on the job, opening envelopes, she counted about $30,000 in donations—in a room filled with about 20 other women doing the same job. “When ‘partners’ wouldn't donate so much money, they would cut back on staff,” Sanchez said. When times were good, they would ramp up.

The workload depended on what Popoff was saying on his paid television spots. “The real clincher,” Sanchez said, “was when they started asking for all your gold, your trinkets, your heirlooms. And tubs and tubs of gold and stones came in. They would take the stones out, take the gold to be resold.” Anything that wasn't valuable was shredded. “It was a shame how many shred bins were full to the rim with prayer requests awaiting to be destroyed and never seen again,” Sanchez wrote.

Sanchez, who quit in early 2012, was one of two ex-employees who spoke with me. The other, somebody higher up, told me that the distribution of the “miracle spring water” was subcontracted to a packaging plant in Cedar Grove, New Jersey. So one day I took the Garden State Parkway to have a look at Unit Pack, a family-run firm that specializes in packaging those little samples of shampoo, pharmaceuticals, and the like. I met the very friendly father and two sons who owned the place, and they confirmed for me that they do business with Popoff, but they didn't say much more.

And then, on my way out, I got even closer to the truth. I was walking out toward my car when I saw a guy pulling down the metal door at a loading dock on the side of the building. He looked 30-ish and was wearing a Cowboys baseball cap and a greasy Unit Pack jumper. Two rings through his lower lip framed his broad smile. We started talking. He said he was the only guy in receiving—if it came to Unit Pack, it came to him. I asked about Popoff.

“What troubles you?” Popoff asked. I held up my broken finger. He touched it and le t loose a loud stream of glossolalia, speaking in tongues, as Pentecostals do. “Shabalalalalalalala!”

“Yeah, we do him,” the man said. “We go through Poland Spring.”

“The Popoff water is Poland Spring?” I asked.

“Yeah, they deliver it right here,” he said. “Paul is the guy who does the deliveries. Once or twice a month he comes. For Peter Popoff, we do 35 gallon-size jugs at a time, once or twice a month. One time they came with 130 gallon-size jugs.”

And then he said something mysterious, maybe even beautiful. I still can't decide. Popoff, he said, sends his own pre-blessed water, in a 16-ounce bottle, to add to all the jugs of Poland Spring. So that every little package of water contains a few molecules of holiness.

“I'm the one who pours the blessed water into the drums,” said the man with the lip rings. “I measure it out and add it into the drums.”

Was it possible, I wondered, that Popoff believes in his own powers, just a little? Did he fear God just enough to gesture toward authenticity, so that if he was ever questioned at the pearly gates about the millions of dollars of other people's gold and silver and Social Security money, he could say that in every New Jersey-packed packet of holy water there was a minuscule amount of blessing? I didn't know it then, but I would soon get to ask Popoff in person.

Late last November, my nationwide dragnet for tickets to see Popoff snagged something. One of the friends I'd cajoled into donating got a text message inviting her to an event in Washington, D.C. That's how I found myself, two days later, hustling into the Marriott Wardman Park for a 7 p.m. show. As it happens, I'd broken my left pinkie a month earlier, so my hand was in a splint. I looked like the real deal: a man in need of supernatural healing.

The conference room was packed with a thousand people, maybe two thousand. In this crowd, I was very white, very young, and very male. Some of the ladies had walkers or wheelchairs, some were healthy enough to dance in the aisles to the gospel music playing over loudspeakers. Hired men in suits passed out slips, telling us to jot down the ailments for which we needed intercession.

When Peter Popoff finally emerged, he gave a short sermon, but his heart wasn't in it. No matter: He knew that we weren't there for his preaching. He descended into the crowd, trailing an entourage of security men, his son, and a camera crew. People reached out to touch him, their hands seeming to plead, “Help me.” He picked people out and asked what was wrong. Arthritis, they said. Or kidney problems, a bum ticker, thyroid. Every kind of sickness. He spent two or three minutes with each hopeful worshipper, leaning in to whisper, and then—what they'd come for, what they needed—touching them.

Popoff is of the same generation as Bruce Springsteen, and he clearly shares the Boss's compulsion to never let an audience down. He worked the aisles for two hours that night, back and forth, until finally he was in my section. Before I knew it, he was upon me. The lights of his camera crew were blinding, but here he was, choosing me.

“What troubles you?” he asked. I held up my broken finger. He touched it, and then he let loose a loud stream of glossolalia, speaking in tongues, as Pentecostals do. “Shabalalalalalalala!” he cried. I wiggled my pinkie—which I had been able to do, anyway—and he shouted, “You are healed!” and gave me a long, tight hug. It felt good, as hugs do.

And then came something I didn't expect: love from the crowd, people rubbing me on my back after I sat down, touching me, giving me high fives, saying, “Praise the Lord!” It felt so good that even if my pinkie had been causing excruciating pain, or even if I'd had a far worse condition, something that in my heart I'd known was incurable, I'm sure that, for the moment, I would not have noticed.

The night that I was healed and hugged by Peter Popoff, I saw no sign that he was using an earpiece. If he had any plants in the audience, he didn't make good use of them. As he approached each of us, he asked what ailed us—he didn't pretend to know. And we in the audience were eager to believe in his powers. The earpiece, I realized, was always an unnecessary gimmick. Popoff is better than he knows.

I sensed the same ambivalence when I met Larry Skelton. He was introduced to Popoff when Popoff was only 15; Skelton was the organist in Popoff's father's road show, then in Popoff's, off and on, from 1965 to 1990. Skelton didn't return my calls, so one Sunday, I staked out his house in Mesquite, a hard-luck Dallas exurb. At about half past noon, he and his wife pulled into the driveway, back from church, I figured. Skelton invited me in, with an air of resignation. His wife eyed me warily.

Skelton wanted to make it clear, before we talked about his friend Popoff, that faith healing was real. “I've seen people with a short leg that had, for a while, a six-inch buildup on one of their shoes,” said Skelton, who's 80, ten years older than Popoff. “You could see, there was no fakery to it. All of a sudden, that leg began to grow out to the same size as the other.”

I asked if Popoff was the real deal. He thought for a moment, then replied that, yes, Popoff was the real deal. But I'd noticed his hesitation, and he could tell that I'd noticed, so he explained.

“When you're praying for the sick, it's through the Holy Spirit, and there's some times that it works freely, and then there are other times when the Spirit's just not there,” Skelton said. On the days when the Holy Spirit didn't show up freely, you had to help it along; after all, you still needed to pass the hat. “You're in that auditorium, and you had to pay for that sucker. In advance.”

The day after I talked with Skelton, he called me and asked if I could include one last sentiment, and I said I would. This is what he said: “That mess he got into, that was 30 years ago. He went bankrupt, he lost everything he had, he had to start over. And ever since then, I know, I personally know, that he is by the book and careful. Auditors come in every year. He wants it that way, so there is no question about where the money goes. And that's the gospel truth.”

In December, Popoff's daughter, Amy Cardiff, called me. She had first responded to my pestering a few months earlier, but I never expected that the Popoffs would consent to an interview. And yet, they did. On December 21, Peter Popoff welcomed me into his office, where we were joined by Amy and Nick, the two children who work in the ministry (another son, Alexander, is in the military). He didn't recognize me from the time he healed my finger in Washington (not that I expected he would). For an hour and a half, he answered my questions—about miracle spring water, James Randi, bankruptcy, his tennis game, the Holy Spirit.

Popoff wore a natty suit and a tie knotted to the strangulation point. He moves slowly, but not frailly—more like a muscular man managing his own physique. And the hair truly is something, shiny and monochrome like an action figure's. When I asked how I could have hair like his when I got older, he quoted Exodus: “ ‘I am the Lord thy God that heals thee!’ That's the promise that God gave to Israel. If you can take that by faith, you'll live a life of increase.” And great hair.

Popoff talked about everything, without a trace of defensiveness. According to him, declaring bankruptcy was a mistake, the misguided suggestion of lawyers. In reality, he said, the exposé on The Tonight Show barely hurt his finances. The incoming monthly take “went down by a third for three months; the fourth month it stabilized, and the fifth month it started growing again,” Popoff said. “By the end of that year, we were back to where we were.” He said that they never went off the air, never stopped doing live shows.

He had an answer for everything, or almost everything. When I inquired about the college scholarships and Ukrainian orphanages that, according to their mailings, the ministry funded, he said he'd get back to me with the addresses of the orphanages (he never did) and the details about how much the scholarships were worth (ditto). They did not want to comment on Crystal Sanchez's allegations in her e-book.

But when I asked about the earpiece, Popoff was happy to talk. “We were taping television! And I venture to say anyone doing TV programs...” He trailed off, as if he were saying something so obvious it didn't bear finishing.

I mentioned his $4.5 million house. “It's now worth 10 million!” he said. “So I made the ministry $5 million!”

“It wasn't always like this,” Amy interrupted to say. “When I was born, we traveled in a trailer.”

Popoff seemed to be truly enjoying my company, but his children were uncomfortable. The family business is theirs to inherit, and both told me that they have “the gift” and could take over someday. Meanwhile, as chief administrative officer (Amy) and executive vice president (Nick), they prosper alongside him. They wouldn't tell me what they earn, but Nick enjoyed telling me about the Clydesdale horses he keeps.

“We are a prosperity ministry that preaches prosperity,” Nick added. “We preach financial blessings. God has prospered us.” The good life they lead is proof of their powers. If they weren't noticeably rich, what authority would they have to promise riches to others?

At this point, I had a sense of déjà vu, a flashback to other scandal-plagued gurus I'd interviewed, like the New Age teacher and ex-rabbi Marc Gafni, who had been accused of plagiarism, serial dishonesty, and sexual misconduct with a 13-year-old (his excuse was that she'd been 14), or the Zen master Eido Shimano, who'd been seducing and emotionally abusing his female students for decades. In each case, I was shocked that they'd agreed to be interviewed, until I realized, as I sat with them, that they didn't think they had anything to hide. They're like Jack Nicholson's Colonel Jessup in A Few Good Men—they want to say it. They want to take the stand. Their lawyers and friends can tell them to shut up, but that makes them look guilty, and they don't feel guilty.

Peter Popoff inhabits both hemispheres of our national brain, the Puritan and the magician. He believes in divine magic-but not at the expense of the work ethic.

As I sat with the gregarious, affable Popoff, I understood: He believes he is helping people. If you accept, as Pentecostal Christians do, that God performs miracles, on the body, soul, and bank account, then his ministry offers a series of fair exchanges between him and his audience. They give money; he sends them trinkets. They make him rich, pray with the trinkets, and maybe get rich, too. He touches them and they feel better.

And if they don't feel better? Well, there are no guarantees. “There's nothing magical about them,” he said about the spring water, the baruch wallet, and all the stuff I'd gotten in the mail. “They are simply points of contact”—they help people focus their prayer. God decides what prayers to answer.

I took a bathroom break in Popoff's private lavatory, right off his office. The walls were covered with little inspirational notes. Next to the sink: “But I am trusting you, O Lord, saying, ‘You are my God!’ My future is in your hands.—Psalm 31:14–15.” Below that, on a sticky note: “Whatever you touch will prosper and succeed. You will lend and not borrow.” (That one's from Joel Osteen.) Then, next to the toilet paper, an 8½-by-11 printout listing the family's goals for 2015—Peter's, Liz's, Nick's, Amy's. Peter's list included more crusades, “Book some fun trips including Italy, Skiing, and Lake Tahoe,” and, at number five, “Tax Exemption in Canada.” It was an astonishing précis of the prosperity gospel. Get converts, get time on the slopes, get a tax exemption.

But here's the thing about Peter and Liz Popoff and their kids: They could have all their ski trips and Bentleys and Clydesdale horses without ever working another day in their lives. Yet here they are, hitting mildewy, ticky-tacky hotel ballrooms and convention centers in a dozen cities every year, as if the salvation of the world depended on it. This septuagenarian clocks the hours of a junior lawyer trying to make partner. Which complicates any theory that he is trying to get something for nothing. He's trying to get something, all right—millions of something, in fact—but not for nothing. He works hard for his money.

Peter Popoff is the all-American faith healer because he inhabits both hemispheres of our national brain, the Puritan and the magician. He believes in divine magic—to enrich you, to heal you, or just to entertain you—but not at the expense of the work ethic. He'll do the work, all right, and your part is just suspending disbelief and sending him a check to show that you mean it. He gets rich, you get hope.

It's hard to escape the parallels with another baby boomer, a man born just two weeks before Popoff in the summer of '46, just before the United States entered its long, hopeful postwar expansion. Both men went into the family business, suffered reversals, went bankrupt, seemed destined to be TV-rerun laughingstocks. One became president, the other just became rich. Both seem to be running cons, but both have followers who either don't notice or don't care. Both men have produced nothing, except, for their followers, fervent certainty that they can produce anything. And say what you will about the trust people have in them— it hasn't come easy. “I've been working for 50 years,” Popoff told me. “It's not something I snapped my fingers and it magically appeared. It's been a long and winding road!”

Mark Oppenheimer is the editor-at-large at Tablet magazine. This is his first article for GQ.

http://www.gq.com/story/peter-popoff-born-again-scoundrel?mbid=social_cp_fb_tny

Mar 3, 2017

Inside Shen Yun’s delicate dance between politics and the stage

Based in New York, Shen Yun has grown into a massive organization with five troupes that tour the world simultaneously.
Based in New York, Shen Yun has grown
 into a massive organization with five
troupes that tour the world simultaneously.
MARTHA SCHABAS
THE GLOBE AND MAIL
March 3, 2017

If your eyes have been open in the Greater Toronto Area these past few months, they’ve probably landed on a poster or billboard for Shen Yun. Set against a background of rich jade, the company’s promotional material depicts a dancer caught mid-leap as swaths of orange fabric billow from her sleeves. The image has kept lookout over the Gardiner Expressway since December; it adorns TTC shelters and is tacked to coffee-shop walls and laundromat corkboards. Glancing at it in passing, you’d be more likely to note the serene effect of the colour scheme than suspect it represented anything politically contentious.

But the Shen Yun Performing Arts company has been a controversial entity since it was founded by Falun Gong practitioners in 2006. Based in New York, Shen Yun has grown into a massive organization with five troupes that tour the world simultaneously (the seven-city Canadian portion closed on Thursday night in Toronto, but you can count on it returning next year). The company is banned from entering, let alone performing in, China, where it’s seen as the direct voice of the outlawed Falun Gong movement and condemned as anti-state propaganda. The website for the Chinese embassy in the United States discredits Shen Yun not just for its “tacky taste and low artistic standards” but as a political tool preaching “cult messages.”

In a Globe and Mail interview from 2010, a press officer from Toronto’s Chinese consulate-general urged the public not to attend the company’s current show, calling it “false performance.”

Shen Yun tells a different story, holding that its suppression is but one example of the authoritarian regime’s crackdown on freedom of expression and religion. The company bills itself as a repository of 5,000 years of Chinese culture, which the Communist Party has tried to obliterate.

Intrigued by such grandiose claims to truth and lies – and concerned, more fundamentally, about the suppression of any artistic expression – I wanted to see Shen Yun for myself.

Before I attended the opening night in Toronto at the Four Seasons Centre for the Arts, I tried to do a little research. Shen Yun’s website is a polished and elaborate affair, replete with video interviews of the dancers and extensive background on the tenets of Falun Gong spirituality and the history of the movement’s persecution. And yet, there’s no effective way to contact the company. I called the only listed number, a 1-800 hotline in the United States, and had my call returned somewhat mysteriously (via text) by the volunteer media contact at the Falun Dafa organization in Toronto (Dafa and Gong are interchangeable terms). I was informed that Shen Yun provides no media tickets and that the artists are not available for interviews.

Meanwhile, calling the press office at the Chinese consulate took me to a full voice-mail inbox. I was eventually asked to send an interview request to a Hotmail account called “torontochina2011.” My request was declined, but the consulate did send me links to negative reviews of Shen Yun’s previous shows, including a thread of one-star pans from Yelp.com.

The Four Seasons Centre, with more than 2,000 seats, was virtually sold-out on opening night. Flipping through the program, I found full-page greetings from Governor-General David Johnston and Toronto Mayor John Tory. While the mayor limits his remarks to congratulating the company for bringing their performance to Toronto, the Governor-General actually treads toward critical commentary, crediting Shen Yun for their “creativity and grace.”

As the curtain fell on the two-hour-plus performance, I’d say he’s half right.

I certainly saw technical grace in Shen Yun’s program, which consisted of 17 short dance pieces and two live-music performances. Classical Chinese dance is a highly regimented and athletic form that demands a limberness and flexibility that exceeds what’s required, even, of classical ballet. The tenor is more gymnastic, with legs that stretch so high they create hyperextended lines and acrobatic tumbles that include aerial flips and complex split-leaps. The dancers not only rise to the challenge of this athleticism, but also find the form’s characteristic fluidity. In Chinese dance, the arms and hands move with distinct ripples, creating a dreamy, watery effect. The ensemble work, of which there’s plenty, is technically uniform and unfailingly synchronized. There’s no doubt this is an immaculately trained and rehearsed group of artists.

But creativity is a tougher term to define, other than to say it suggests creating something that wouldn’t otherwise exist and, hence, relies on the application of imagination. It’s exactly what the evening lacked for me, both in content and structure. The show was hosted by two bilingual masters of ceremony, a man in a suit and a woman in an evening gown, who smiled with an eerie, children’s-show unflappability and introduced every work with synopses and explanations. Audience members who like their art to require a little emotional or intellectual unpacking might have felt short-changed by these tidy, instructional précis.

Even forgiving this kind of didacticism, the show’s ability to provide any real immersion into the atmosphere of the Han dynasty or the spirit of Tibetan drummers was undermined by its own production values. Each work was performed in front of a huge screen that depicted a high-beam computer-generated image of waterfalls, mountain ranges or temples. The preferred gimmick for entrances and exits, used repeatedly in over half the pieces, was to have the dancers appear first as computerized figures soaring through these cartoonish landscapes before they materialized as fully formed humans onstage. The effect was more Vegas than ancient, and any subtlety in the choreography of a Mongolian bowl dance or Song-dynasty folk number was swallowed by this flashiness upstage. This problem was echoed in the colour schemes; dazzlingly hued costumes were consistently subdued by having the same busy colours blazing on the background screen.

Because we quickly came to expect the same thing from every segment – video-game backgrounds, digestible stories and dizzying colours – the toned-down feel of the two overtly political pieces, A Child’s Choice and Boundless Compassion, felt (at first) like an aesthetic breath of fresh air. Both started similarly, with sanguine dancers dressed in school-type uniforms as they performed the tai-chi-like exercises of Falun Gong practice. Suddenly, thugs wielding clubs storm onstage – we know they’re communists because of the red hammer-and-sickle insignia on their backs – and beat the peaceful practitioners, leaving them for dead. In A Child’s Choice, the story develops into an orphan narrative: The daughter of killed practitioners is reunited with the Falun Dafa years later and welcomed into their community.

In Boundless Compassion, the narrative gets even stranger. The screen depicts a modern cityscape where there’s a sudden explosion of mushroom-cloud proportions. As skyscrapers and neighbourhoods crumble into dust, a godlike figure appears in a halo of white light. The dust dissipates and the screen becomes saturated in rings of gold chroma. The dead Falun Gong practitioners come back to life, instantly resurrected. (It’s worth noting that this segment was preceded by tenor Tian Ge singing about the need to seek out Dafa followers for deliverance to heaven. The religious lyrics appeared in Mandarin and English on the screen behind him; they’re also printed in the program.)

We’re left scratching our heads a little, assuming that this posturban, postmaterialist millenarianism is a central teaching of the Falun Gong practice, and wondering just what kind of show we’ve spent $150 to attend. Are these political/religious pieces trying to teach us about the Falun Gong, or are they trying to instruct our own behaviour? And the simplicity of their “lessons” is more than artistically unsatisfying; it runs the risk of working at cross-purposes to what are, no doubt, Shen Yun’s intentions. It’s hard to muster much empathy when you feel as though a performance is working on an emotional spectrum between grovelling and guilt.

Near the end of the evening, Leeshai Lemish (the male MC) reminded the audience that while Shen Yun tours annually, there’s a brand-new program every year. “So if you’ve seen it once,” he said, still smiling fervently, “you haven’t seen it at all.” But having “seen it all” was exactly how I felt after this long, tiresome evening in which the pieces felt so similar, so beholden to the same production values and set on achieving the same Disneyfied effect, that one became indistinguishable from the next.

Could the company change tack in future years, as opposition to Shen Yun continues to dwindle? I hope so. There’s incontestable talent among these dancers and the company has a skilled and elaborate orchestra that boasts both classical Western and Eastern instruments. But as it stands, Shen Yun is clearly politically motivated – a fact that many audience members might not have known when they bought their tickets, which is – in itself – unsettling.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/theatre-and-performance/inside-shen-yuns-delicate-dance-between-politics-and-thestage/article34201842/

The Family review: Chris Johnston and Rosie Jones investigate the sinister cult

Simon Caterson
Sydney Morning Herald
March 4, 2017

"If you could look into her eyes you would understand" was how one former cult member attempted to convey a sense of the mesmerising presence of Anne Hamilton-Byrne. The Family is unusual among modern religious cults in having a female leader, though in other ways the group follows a familiar pattern of bizarre ritual, paranoid exclusivity and ruthless exploitation.

For this compelling account of one of Australia's most notorious cults, Johnston, a senior writer for Fairfax, combined forces with filmmaker Rosie Jones, whose documentary about The Family premiered at last year's Melbourne International Film Festival and is due for general release later this month.

The authors trace the extraordinary life of a woman who operated "at the edges of human belief". That Hamilton-Byrne succeeded in gaining so many wealthy and well-educated followers among Melbourne's post-war elite is testament to her personal charm as well as the fact that a privileged upbringing is no assurance of common sense.

Born into rural poverty and family dysfunction, Hamilton-Byrne found a way to enter the Melbourne establishment through the careful cultivation of certain individuals. Her first major acolyte was the Oxford-educated physicist Raynor Johnson, who for 30 years served as head of Queen's College at the University of Melbourne. Johnson occupied his position in charge of a respected Methodist educational institution notwithstanding his open enthusiasm for the occult.

After she had visited his office at Queen's College in 1962, Johnson became convinced Hamilton-Byrne not only had the powers of a clairvoyant and faith healer, but that she was also, as she claimed, the divine reincarnation of Jesus Christ. Johnson became an influential supporter of The Family, as did Dr L. Howard Whitaker, a prominent psychiatrist based at a private clinic in Kew that was the first in Victoria to administer LSD to patients.

The Kew clinic would be used as the venue for indoctrination sessions in which hallucinogenic drugs were used on the children brought into The Family through a series of fake adoptions. This and other shady aspects of cult business were facilitated by another well-connected member of The Family, a solicitor by the name of Peter Kibby.

The Family's early meetings were held in the affluent suburb of Brighton before a permanent base was established in the Ferny Creek area of the Dandenongs. There the children procured for The Family were home-schooled with many of them having their hair dyed bleached-blonde. According to survivor accounts, starvation and beatings as well as terrorisation and brainwashing were part and parcel of a child's life within The Family.

Recently Johnston and Jones went to see Hamilton-Byrne, who is aged in her 90s and resides at a Melbourne nursing home. They describe her as "confused, rambling, and very old – but, it must be said, quite radiant".

With her current net worth estimated by the authors to be in the region of $10 million, Hamilton-Byrne has never been charged with anything more serious than fraud. Despite being diagnosed with dementia and thus placed beyond the reach of the law, she retains devoted followers, chief among whom is a man identified in the book as the private school-educated nephew of a past Governor-General.

Even following decades of revelations of horrific child abuse and massive fraud perpetrated in the name of The Family, there is at least one member of the Melbourne establishment still willing to publicly support and defend Australia's most infamous cult leader.

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/books/the-family-review-chris-johnston-and-rosie-jones-investigate-the-sinister-cult-20170223-gujz07.html

Jehovah's Witnesses ask Kremlin for relief from pressure

AP
March 3, 2017

MOSCOW (AP) — The leader of the Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia is calling on the head of the Kremlin's human rights council to prevent what the denomination fears is an imminent total ban on the religion.

The Jehovah's Witnesses, who claim more than 170,000 faithful in Russia, have come under increasing pressure in recent years, including a ban on distributing literature deemed to violate Russia's anti-extremism laws.

In February, investigators conducted an inspection of the religion's headquarters in St. Petersburg, which could be a precursor to a ban.

"A ban on its activity in Russia would cause uneasiness throughout the world," the religion's Russian leader, Vasily Kalin, said in a letter to presidential human rights council head Mikhail Fedotov. A copy was made available to The Associated Press on Thursday.

https://apnews.com/ee7003bc20944350999f2a1b3cbe910a




Down Memory Lane with Raniere, Bronfmans Lama Tenzin and Dalai Lama

ARTVOICE
 
 
As readers know, NXIVM conducts “human potential and ethics” seminars in Albany and elsewhere. Keith Raniere is the company’s founder. And Clare and Sara Bronfman (two of heiresses of the Seagram’s fortune) started investing with Raniere around 2003.
By 2007 the Bronfman sisters had invested more than $100 million in commodities, real estate and in litigation to sue adversaries who were preventing NXIVM from reaching its full potential.
Some of the litigation was aimed at indicting adversaries, including one of Raniere’s harem members who left the NXIVM group.
In Idaho, in 2007, Sara Bronfman met the Venerable Lama Tenzin Dhonden, a special emissary of His Holiness the Dalai Lama.  The title venerable is given to Buddhist monks who take a vow of celibacy and poverty.
Sara told Lama Dhonden that the Dalai Lama might find NXIVM’s tools useful.
Tenzin visited Sara in Albany and met NXIVM members. Raniere thought that the Dalai Lama should come to Albany since his teachings were consonant with his own.
Despite allegations that NXIVM was a cult, Lama Tenzin said, “I have my own intellectual resource, capacity, to know persons, to feel persons. I can pick up like that, very easily.”
Lama Tenzin arranged for Sara and Clare Bronfman and Nancy Salzman, president of NXIVM, to meet with the Dalai Lama in India. There they expressed their desire to invite His Holiness to Albany to meet Raniere and offered to make a suitable contribution to the Dalai Lama for his worthwhile causes.
The Dalai Lama agreed.
Back in Albany, Clare told the Albany Times Union that she had a vision of “bringing His Holiness together with Keith, believing that we may have certain tools that His Holiness would think would be good and beneficial for humanity.”
Venerable Lama Tenzin Dhonden lent his voice, as well, announcing, “With the ethical tools developed by Keith Raniere, and the presence, wisdom and guidance of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, we have the essential ingredients to transform our society.”
It wasn’t long before the Venerable Lama Tenzin Dhonden was transformed by Raniere’s ethical tools. The monk began an affair with Sara Bronfman, according to witnesses.
One night, Sara’s mother’s friend came to Sara’s house unexpectedly and found Sara and Lama Tenzin in the hot tub cuddling amorously, or, as NXIVM inner circle and Raniere (ex)harem member, Kristin Keeffe called it, “canoodling.”
Barbara Bouchey, another (ex)harem member, said, “Yeah, they weren’t having sex, but they were in the hot tub in a hot-necking embrace.”
From monk to a hot tub with an heiresses; it was mere paces to the bedroom.
Bouchey said, “I’ve showed up to her house a couple of times and the two of them come out of that bedroom.”
Keeffe said, “I’ve seen him come out of the fucking bedroom. It wasn’t even a secret.”
Raniere knew. So did his harem.
Raniere use to say to Sara in front of others, referring to Lama Tenzin, ‘how’s your husband?’”
Sara Bronfman purchased a home for her lover Lama in Half Moon, a suburb of Albany.
While things were hot with the Lama and Sara, her sister, Clare, announced to the media that the Dalai Lama was to appear in Albany for four days of talks and meetings, side by side with Raniere and capped by an appearance on Sunday, April 9, 2009, at the Albany Times Union Center, where His Holiness would give a public address on compassion and ethics and announce the confluence of greatness – the Dalai Lama and Keith Raniere.
There was shock when it was reported. Stories in the Albany Times Union, the Albany Student Press, The Daily Gazette and Metroland reported people’s astonishment at the coupling of the Dalai Lama with Raniere.
Attempts to get a college to cosponsor [at no cost] the event failed.
The Albany Times-Union reported that, despite the stature of the Dalai Lama as a religious leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner, Skidmore College and Raniere’s own Alma Mater, Rensselaer Polytechnic, declined to host the event.
A Rensselaer spokesperson explained, “While we have the highest respect for the Dalai Lama and his teachings, we chose not to accept the invitation based on a variety of considerations.”
The University of Albany agreed to rent out an arena with a strict condition, “that by no means were we going to allow NXIVM to be part of our relationship with the Dalai Lama. NXIVM and the organization were not going to have any part with dealing with our students, or advertising or recruiting,” according to U Albany’s vice president for development, Fardin Sanai.
Daniel Weaver, in the Schenectady Gazette, summed up what many felt about the leader of NXIVM: “Keith Raniere has been involved in controversy for the last 20 years. He’s been the subject of lawsuits and investigations. He has initiated numerous lawsuits, many of which appear to be frivolous. He also harasses people….  He is hardly a poster boy for humanitarianism, peace and ethics; and his invitation to the Dalai Lama to speak  makes one question the motive of the invitation.….  Raniere has not utilized compassionate ethical methods and solutions to address problems. Keith Raniere has brought anything but peace to the Capital Region.”
Following the negative publicity, the Dalai Lama canceled his appearance. Times Union Publisher George Hearst spoke with a representative of the Dalai Lama. Hearst said, “there’s enough stuff out there that (they) don’t need to expose His Holiness to this kind of risk.”
For NXIVM, this was a PR nightmare.
Sara wrote on her blog: “The highly paid media campaign designed to destroy our company, or any person or entity related to it, reared its ugly head at the news of his visit. We had naively believed people would be excited about his visit and that our community would put their pettiness aside to unite for this momentous occasion. We were wrong. His visit was met with fear and cynicism and some of our local media sources worked ardently to destroy the honor faster than we could build it.”
But through the teachings of Raniere, they had learned to be persistent.
Sara, Clare, Salzman and Raniere went to India to persuade the Dalai Lama to come..
While the Dalai Lama would not consent to the original four-day planned visit, to teach side by side with Raniere, he agreed to deliver a single lecture.
He was coming to the US for a Harvard University sponsored engagement and could spare one day in Albany.
Sara called it a success.
“After an onslaught of negative articles and powerful local personalities voicing their lack of support for his proposed visit, His Holiness postponed until the truth became evident,” Sara wrote on her blog. “In the end the truth prevailed, but in the process we lost participants, money and good faith.”
The press that announced the cancellation, now announced the rescheduling, noting  that the Dalai Lama event moved from the 7,500 seat Albany Times-Union Center to the much smaller, 2,800 seat Albany Palace Theater. .
Meanwhile critics took shots at the Dalai Lama. It was widely assumed Bronfman money changed his mind
When questioned if there was any financial incentive from the Bronfmans connected to his visit to Albany, Lobsang Nyandak, representative of His Holiness the Dalai Lama to the Americas, told the Times Union that the Dalai Lama would not receive money for his trip. When pressed for clarification, however, he said that whatever money was received would be “used for charitable and other purposes as per His Holiness’ guidance.”
Two days before the Dalai Lama’s rescheduled appearance in Albany, the Dalai Lama Trust was registered in New York State and, according to sources at NXIVM, the Bronfmans donated $1 million to the Dalai Lama through this trust.
On May 6, the Dalai Lama spoke at Albany’s Palace Theatre to a crowd of about 2600.
Onstage, the Dalai Lama presented Sara and Clare with white silk scarves, called “kataks,” which, according to Tibetan culture, symbolize purity. Seated cross legged on a chair, The Dalai Lama spoke about compassion for an hour and a half.
During question and answer, the Dalai Lama, asked about his canceled visit, said of Raniere, “….  If you have done something wrong, you must accept, you must admit, change, make correction. If you have not done (anything wrong), make clear all these allegations (are untrue), truthfully, honestly, openly, transparently.’”
Then he asked the media to investigate Raniere and report the truth of their findings.
Then the Dalai Lama called Raniere on stage and placed a katak around his neck.
After the event, Sara wrote on her blog, “As we stood in the rain to say goodbye to His Holiness the Dalai Lama, he touched each of our cheeks and held our faces next to his with the words ‘thank you’ and ‘see you again.’  Tears started running uncontrollably down my cheeks.…  his visit was a privilege we fought for….. It was a long road, and one paved with hardship, adversity, and tremendous growth….  However my hope for humanity was restored by possibly the greatest leader of our time…. who has a strong enough sense of himself not to seek external security, and who conforms to truth as his standard …. It was a victory for us, for this region and for humanity. I feel proud to have been a part of this great feat.”
Clare also wrote on her blog. “Due to the ongoing struggle several of my closest friends and I have (had) here in Albany – how we have been portrayed in the media – his visiting and message was particularly moving. His coming brought about a certain contradiction: what is written about NXIVM, Keith, Sara and myself in the press – being labeled as a cult – and a world leader showing his support for us after thorough investigation.”
Despite the happy blogs, the media thought little about the great feat of bringing the Dalai Lama to Albany.
Shortly after his visit, the Albany Times Union reported that the Bronfmans lost more than $100 million in bad real estate investments and commodities losses, plus detailed their serial litigation calling NXIVM a “litigation machine.”
The Dalai Lama had asked the media to investigate Raniere and the New York Post, Vanity Fair, Forbes, The New York Observer, the Nation, and other magazines and newspapers, but especially the Albany Times Union, uncovered and reported many more items unknown to the public about Raniere including allegations of statutory rape; the efforts to hide the paternity of his son, the lovesick letters he sent followed by veiled death threats to ex lovers, the suicide of an ex lover and lawsuits pursued against ex-lovers and much more.
Indeed the investigation has only just begun.
Note: Some readers might ask what happened to the canoodling couple, Sara and Lama Tenzin. It may have been Raniere, who decided to seek vengeance on Lama Tenzin, who ordered Sara to break up with him after buying him a house and paying him and the Dalai Lama an untold amount of money.
The torrid affair became tepid, the hot tub sprung a leak and the two split apart.
Sara married a Muslim man, and Lama Tenzin went on to further his spiritual journey.
But Raniere might be gunning for Tenzin, a source says, and with Bronfman money behind him, it could spell substantial legal costs and concerns for Tenzin.

LDS Church goes after MormonLeaks, accuses website of 'copyright' violation

CHRISTOPHER SMART
The Salt Lake Tribune
March 2, 2017


MormonLeaks » Online presentation examining issues that challenge church members’ faith is removed from site.

MormonLeaks went too far this time — at least the LDS Church says so.

The website — which has generated headlines by posting purloined papers on topics ranging from how much Mormon apostles are paid to rules for missionary phone calls home — recently circulated a PowerPoint presentation highlighting issues that could lead members away from the fold.

On Wednesday, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints threatened legal action against MormonLeaks, alleging that the site published copyright material. The PowerPoint was posted on www.docdroid.net, a YouTube-like hosting site for documents, but was removed after the church sent its letter.

Since its December launch, MormonLeaks has made available private LDS papers in a push for more LDS Church transparency, said founder Ryan Mc- Knight, a former Mormon who lives in Las Vegas.

Previous materials leaked through McKnight, including widely circulated videos of briefings given to LDS apostles, have proved to be credible.

Wednesday's letter from the LDS Church is the first threatening MormonLeaks with litigation, McKnight said Thursday, despite earlier posts that could be seen as more incendiary.

The PowerPoint surrounding "issues and ideas leading people away from the gospel," was taken down from docdroid.net, McKnight said. That was not his doing. He said he would have left it up.

The leaked presentation lists such things as "Ordain Women," "incredulity over church history," "pornography" and "lack of righteousness" as concerns that test Mormons' devotion.

The Utah-based faith had no comment regarding the material or the letter from Barry V. Taggart, manager of the church's intellectual property office.

In his letter, Taggart warns McKnight to "act expeditiously" to remove the item from the Internet.

"A copyrighted PowerPoint presentation being distributed through your mormonleaks.io website [at www.docroid.net]," Taggart's letter said, "contains material not authorized by the intellectual property owner, its agents, or the law."

McKnight gained headlines in October, during the church's fall General Conference, when he facilitated the posting of 15 videos showing LDS apostles privately discussing topics ranging from gay rights to politics to piracy. He said he simply wanted to offer "a peek behind the curtain" of the faith's burgeoning bureaucracy.

Mormon officials did not dispute the veracity of the videos, and McKnight soon was inundated by insiders wanting to anonymously make private LDS information public.

"I receive a variety of documents from a variety of sources," he said Thursday. "We have leaked documents from multiple sources. Some leakers have given us more than one document."

McKnight said his goal is to make the church more transparent, particularly regarding its finances and corporate procedures because its members are financially supporting those activities.

csmart@sltrib.com

http://www.sltrib.com/lifestyle/faith/5006039-155/lds-church-goes-after-mormonleaks-accuses


LDS Church has been brought into polygamy debate at Utah Legislature

NATE CARLISLE
The Salt Lake Tribune
March 1, 2017


Complex ties » Anti-bigamy proposal sponsor says polygamists “hijacked” his Mormon faith; advocate of plural marriage says the church is behind the bill.

About 51 weeks ago, polygamists and their supporters picketed in the Utah Capitol's Rotunda.

They were protesting a bill meant to curb polygamy, but it wasn't just the measure's sponsor who drew their ire. Some signs were directed at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which abandoned polygamy in the late 19th century as a condition of Utah statehood and which excommunicates members found practicing it. The protesters suspected the LDS Church had lobbied for the bill.

This year, there is another bill meant to curb polygamy, but it hasn't been polygamists who have been publicly discussing the LDS Church. It has been the bill's sponsor, Rep. Mike Noel, R-Kanab, who is a member of the LDS Church. As the 2017 Utah legislative session has progressed, he has increased his criticism of polygamists, especially those who call themselves fundamentalist Mormons.

"They've hijacked my religion and I actually resent that," Noel told The Associated Press on Feb. 10 as polygamists were marching toward the Capitol in another protest.

Then, on Thursday, Noel gave a speech on the House floor in support of his HB99. He called polygamous sects "organized crime" and complained that the public confuses polygamous groups such as the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints with his church.

"The fact that individuals come up there and testify they are FLDS Mormons insults me and bothers me," Noel said, raising his voice. "They are an apostate group and they are no part of my religion."

HB99 passed 48-25. It is waiting for action in the Utah Senate. It is not scheduled for a hearing, and it is unclear whether the Senate will consider it before the Legislature adjourns March 9.

LDS Church spokesman Eric Hawkins said Tuesday in an email that the Salt Lake City-based faith has not lobbied for the bill.

Asked to state the church's position on it, Hawkins wrote: "The practice of polygamy remains strictly prohibited in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. When it comes to laws governing polygamy, the church's primary interest is in looking after potential victims of such associations.

"The church is concerned that reducing the perceived seriousness of this criminal activity sends the message that such abuses are not serious criminal offenses."

LDS Church support for keeping polygamy a felony motivated polygamists at the 2016 protest. One sign depicted two missionaries from the LDS Church peeking inside the bedroom of a man and woman under the covers. The sign read, "Mormon Bedroom Police."

That 2016 bill died in the same place the 2017 bill is currently lodged — it failed to get a hearing or a vote in the Utah Senate.

Joe Darger, who has three wives, has led the opposition to bigamy bills in 2016 and this year. He said Noel's opinions of fundamentalist Mormons — typically defined as people who adhere to the practices taught by LDS Church Presidents Joseph Smith and Brigham Young — are hardly unique among legislators.

"When I use the term 'plural Mormon families,' " Darger said, "I watch their faces all twitter."

Darger said Noel's statements strengthen polygamists' arguments that the Legislature is crafting a law aimed at one group. Polygamists have called that unconstitutional.

Amos Guiora, a University of Utah law professor who has published research showing polygamy is harmful to women and children, said Friday that Noel's statements are unlikely to cause any legal consequences. It is unlikely polygamists will be able to effectively use what Noel said as evidence in any lawsuit challenging the polygamy bill, Guiora said, because it is within the Legislature's purview to establish crimes and punishments.

"That strikes me not as targeting a particular group," Guiora said, "but protecting the vulnerable, which is exactly what a legislature should be doing."

This year's bill adds criteria for being prosecuted for bigamy: The offender must live with the extra spouse and "purport" to be married. Current state law requires only one or the other.

HB99 would keep the offense a third-degree felony punishable by up to five years in prison, but those penalties could increase to one to 15 years if bigamy is prosecuted in conjunction with crimes such as abuse, fraud or human smuggling. Anyone leaving a polygamous marriage and reporting abuse or protecting a child would receive amnesty.

Noel has done more than air theological disagreements. His district includes parts of Washington County, home of the FLDS, and he has said he was encouraged to sponsor his bill when he heard stories of abuse from former members of that and other polygamous churches.

Debates over the bills last year and this year also have highlighted the complicated relationships between polygamy and the LDS Church. Noel has discussed how two of his great-grandfathers served time in jail for polygamy. Other legislators have discussed their own family history with polygamy.

Polygamous groups that consider themselves fundamentalist Mormons worship from similar texts as the LDS Church. Used hymnals from LDS wards have found their way to polygamous congregations.

LDS charities have helped people fleeing polygamous households. Many people from polygamous families choose to get baptized in the LDS Church, including two of Darger's children.

Darger said Noel's statements show how the LDS Church should engage in a dialogue with lawmakers and polygamists about the proper way to address polygamy.

"It's clear the LDS Church is a stakeholder in this," Darger said, "whether it wants to be or not."

ncarlisle@sltrib.com

Twitter: @natecarlisle

http://www.sltrib.com/home/4995496-155/lds-church-has-been-brought-into

Has Munich's Haus der Kunst Been Infiltrated by Scientology?

Haus der Kunst
Haus der Kunst
In Bavaria, employees must declare any links to Scientology.

Henri Neuendorf
artnet News
March 2, 2017

The Bavarian state security agency is investigating claims that a longtime contractor at Munich’s Haus der Kunst museum has ties to Scientology. The investigation focuses on the work of a senior human resources manager with far-reaching responsibilities over the museum’s staffing.

Bavarian culture minister Ludwig Spaenle, who functions as the chairman of the board of the state-sponsored museum, confirmed the investigation, speaking to the Süddeutsche Zeitung. “We are more than aware of the seriousness of the situation,” he told the German newspaper.

Scientology is not recognized by the German government as a religion. It is viewed by the state, the media, and society at large with extreme suspicion and is regarded as cult-like business operating under the guise of a religion. The organization is routinely monitored by domestic intelligence agencies.

In the state of Bavaria, since 1996, anyone applying for public service positions must provide information regarding their affiliation with Scientology. Although this does not apply directly to the Haus der Kunst, the museum receives financial support from the Bavarian government.

The man under investigation is reportedly a Scientologist who has been working for the museum since 1995, when he was subcontracted as payroll accountant. While it is not unusual for the museum to delegate tasks to outside contractors, the degree of responsibility outsourced to him has aroused suspicion.

“There would be nothing more unpleasant than to lose to Scientology in court,” said Spaenle.

Over time he was promoted to staff administrator, assuming significant responsibility for the institution’s employment policy, where he became responsible for delegating shifts and other tasks.

“Everything goes past his desk,” one employee, a supporter of the embattled subcontractor, told Süddeutsche Zeitung, adding, “Almost all of us were hired by him.” The employee explained that the man was more or less the head of human resources—an arrangement that sits uneasily with some staffers. The controversy, he said, was a smear campaign to discredit him.

Other employees see things differently. They say he took advantage of the leeway granted to him by senior managers. They cite poor working conditions and extreme workloads as well as a draconian system of reward and punishment implemented by him.

Several complaints to the board of directors have been filed, and, in November 2015, several dozen employees signed a collective complaint over poor conditions and treatment. In a follow-up letter in July 2016, obtained by Süddeutsche Zeitung, employees write that “All this leads to the management of the museum, who tolerate gross mistreatment and violations of human dignity.”

That same month, the board reprimanded the museum’s director Okwui Enwezor and other senior managers, seeking assurances that they were not Scientologists. Following the management’s unsatisfactory response to the rebuke, the board alerted the state security agency and commissioned the independent report.

Enwezor emphasized that the employment relationship with the person concerned “has already existed before the obligation [in Bavaria] to self-report on the subject of Scientology, which was introduced in 1996.”

The organization, founded by L. Ron Hubbard, was the subject of the acclaimed documentary Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief(2015), directed by Alex Gibney. “The goal in the film is not to delegitimize anybody’s belief,” says Gibney. “It’s to question the way an outfit like Scientology can take the belief of good-hearted people and turn it in a very sinister direction.”

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/haus-der-kunst-scientology-876008

Ayahuasca: The lawyer fighting for those who take the hallucinogenic drug for religious reasons

Ayahuasca being used during a ceremony in Columbia
'I advocate for the use of ayahuasca as a sacrament. The world is in spiritual crisis these days'

Independent
Kashmira Gander
February 28, 2017

a state where it can do little else other than vomit and crap and while your brain vividly hallucinates. But it’s that level of potency that makes the ayahuasca drug so important in South American spiritual medicine.

Ayahuasca, also known as yage, is a blend of the ayahuasca vine and the chacruna shrub containing dimethyltryptamine or DMT: a hallucinogen. It is created by macerating and boiling the components. The thick, brown brew is then drunk. This process has been repeated for hundreds of years in search of spiritual awakening.

Although the statistics aren't concrete, experts believe that ayahuasca use has been spreading rapidly worldwide, as native American spiritual practices become better known and Westerners look to find themselves, sometimes with devastating effect. In 2014 19-year-old British backpacker Henry Miller died after taking a brew of yage in Colubmia.

While it is illegal in most nations - although almost a decade ago, yage was recognised as a “pillar” of the identity of Amazonian people in Peru - its links with religion sets it in a grey area. In the US, for instance, the First Amendment protects religious freedom while the Drug Enforcement Agency doesn’t look kindly on people supping on powerful hallucinogens.

J. Hamilton Hudson, a lawyer based in the US, is a Research Associate at the Ayahuasca Defense Fund (ADF) which is dedicated to protecting those who use the drug for religious reasons, and counsels those who are concerned about crackdowns.

We asked him about what it's like to try yage, and why he's fighting for people to be able to use it.

Which groups use yage?

Some shamans in the Upper Amazon rainforest from tribes that traditionally drink ayahuasca, Including the Shipibo-Conibo, Huni Kuin, Ashaninka, Huachiperi, and Jívaro, say they learned to drink ayahuasca from jaguars. Interestingly enough, in 2002 the BBC released footage of a jaguar eating ayahuasca leaves in Weird Nature.

Two big churches use ayahuasca all over the world, though they come from Brazil. Santo Daime and the União do Vegeta (UDV). For them, ayahuasca is used as a sacrament, like the Eucharist in Christian churches. Though ayahuasca packs a stronger punch than wafers and wine.

More and more new ayahuasca churches are forming with ayahuasca at their ceremonial centre.

Have you ever tried it?

When living in Pucallpa, Peru working for Alianza Arkana [a group advocating for indigenous peoples] I had the privilege of travelling with my Shipibo-Conibo [an indigenous people] friend to harvest an ayahuasca vine on his family land that he had his eye on since he was a child and I tried that. It was serious.

What is the current law on ayahuasca, and how is it problematic?

Ayahuasca is illegal in most countries save Peru. In some countries, enforcement is lacking. In others, like the Netherlands, ayahuasca is seized on sight by customs. This is all because ayahuasca contains a Schedule I substance, DMT. One problem is that many people think ayahuasca does not equal DMT because the amount of DMT in ayahuasca is too minimal. Another problem is that under some circumstances, religious freedom laws do permit ayahuasca use, but people totally misinterpret how much freedom they have and they think that if they call themselves a “church” they automatically get a blanket of protection—which is wrong. So they get their ayahuasca seized, they get arrested, or they get scary letters from the Drug Enforcement Administration.

Tells us about the controversy surrounding the use of ayahuasca by people posing as Native American churches

The problem with people who are not Native American identifying as a Native American Church and using ayahuasca should be pretty clear. It’s disrespectful to Native Americans. For hundreds of years immigrants have been appropriating Native American names and images for ski hills and football teams, their land for its resources, and their clothing for costumes. Costuming an ayahuasca church as “Native American” when Native Americans didn’t even drink ayahuasca because of some dubious belief that the shameless appropriation will provide some legal protection does a disservice to Native Americans. The “Native American Church” church “certifying” new ayahuasca churches is, in my opinion, super shady and a coalition of real Native American Churches disavowed it in court.

How can ayahuasca be used positively?

Ayahuasca can be used positively when it is used as a sacrament. That is, used for divine communion within the context of an institutionalised ritual with a framework for integration. There are some other ways ayahuasca can be used positively, too, like in the treatment of depression. In fact, there are a lot of ways ayahuasca can be used positively. This quote from a conversation between a Harvard ethnobotanist Richard Evans Spruce and a Kofán shaman tells it like it is:

“When Schultes asked the shaman how often the people drank Yagé [ayahuasca] his response suggested the question had no meaning; during illness, of course, and in the wake of death; in times of need and hardship; at certain passages in life; when a young boy of six has his initial haircut or when he kills for the first time. And naturally, the shaman suggested, a youth will drink Yagé at puberty…as a young man he may drink it at his leisure to improve his hunting technique or simply to flaunt his physical prowess. The message that Schultes received was that the Kofán took Yagé whever they felt like it—at least once a week and no doubt on any occasion that warranted it.”

I advocate for the use of ayahuasca as a sacrament. The world is in spiritual crisis these days, so people could benefit from a well-worn path to their "Divine Being". In the eyes of the law, the most legitimate use for ayahuasca is religious purposes.

Where does the balance lie between legislating on ayahuasca and enabling people to use it for religious ceremonies?

The right legislation enables people to use ayahuasca for religious ceremonies, but it sets the standard so that people are not doing shoddy, chaotic, and sloppy ceremonies without frameworks for integration.

What is the most important thing readers should know about ayahuasca?

The most important thing readers should know about ayahuasca is don't try it. They might not like the taste.

I think it is important to remember that in every “shaman” there is a “sham

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/ayahuasca-lawyer-j-hamilton-hudson-hallucinogenic-drug-religious-reasons-south-america-amazon-tribes-a7603341.html

Minster-grandfather charged in death of 2-year-old girl who died after lack of medical care

Jonathan and Grace Foster have surrendered custody of their six children. The Berks County couple, who are members of Faith Tabernacle, a faith-healing sect, are charged in the November death of their two-year-old daughter Ella, who died of pneumonia.
 Members of Faith Tabernacle, a faith-healing sect.
By Barbara Miller
Penn Live
March 2, 2017

A grandfather who is also a minister is charged with failing to report the death of his granddaughter, whose parents didn't seek medical treatment for her due to their faith.

Rowland George Foster, 71, of the 400 block of North Ninth Street, Lebanon, is charged with failing to report child abuse, a third degree felony, court records say.

Foster, police said, "had reasonable cause to suspect that the victim died due to a failure to obtain adequate medical care."

Jonathan and Grace Foster of Upper Tulpehocken Township, Berks County, were charged with involuntary manslaughter and child endangerment in the Nov. 8 pneumonia death of their daughter, Ella Grace, age 2.

The Fosters, members of Mechanicsburg-based Faith Tabernacle church, attributed the toddler's death to "God's will," according to charges filed in the case.

The Fosters told police their church does not believe in any medical treatment whatsoever, charging documents state.

Rowland Foster is pastor of Faith Tabernacle's Harrisburg district, which includes Lebanon, Mechanicsburg, Shippensburg and Schuylkill Haven, and is also Ella Foster's grandfather.

Rowland Foster told police he received a call from Grace Foster the evening of Nov. 7, after arriving home from a meeting of church elders in Philadelphia. She asked him to come to their home to anoint the child, which is performed in their faith when someone is ill.

Foster said he knew the child had a cold, since she hadn't been at church the previous Sunday.

The day after the anointing, Foster said he again visited the child, and found her in the same condition as the night before, which he described as "resting peacefully."

As he left, he said Jonathan Foster was holding the girl in his arms, and that she "appeared peaceful and that there was no detection of anything out of the ordinary."

Afterward, he said he got a call from Jonathan Foster telling him the child had died. Foster said he went back to the home to be with the family.

Foster told authorities he saw Ella between 11 and 11:45 a.m. on the day she died, and recalled she was "not talking much during the morning, and that she sounded sick."

The Berks County coroner said the child died between 3:20 and 3:24 p.m.

As a minister, Foster was a mandated reporter, and is required to report child abuse, police said, which can include failing to provide a child with adequate medical care, police said.

After arriving back at the home and seeing the child's body, police said he failed to report the child had died due to medical neglect.

Foster was released on his own recognizance and his preliminary hearing is scheduled for March 8.

http://www.pennlive.com/news/2017/03/minister_and_grandfather_of_2-.html

Mar 2, 2017

Constitutional Court demands to suspend activities of the cults, violating election laws

Crime Moldova
16 february 2017

Constitutional Court demands to suspend activities of the cults, violating election laws

President of the Constitutional Court (CC), Alexandru Tanase, recommended the Parliament to amend the electoral law. According to him, the legal framework should allow for the suspension of activities of religious cults and television stations that violate the law.

The CC president has made several statements in this regard in an international conference, organized by the Central Election Commission. In his speech, he said that the presidential elections of 2016 revealed several legislative gaps and deficiencies that some political players tried to turns to their advantage. Tanase specifically referred to the involvement of some representatives of religious denominations in the electoral campaign.

"This is absolutely unacceptable and someone should take the responsibility and courage to put an end to this vicious circle. It is necessary to impose sanctions, including withdrawing the right to carry out religious activities", Tanase said.

https://en.crimemoldova.com/news/social/constitutional-court-demands-to-suspend-activities-of-the-cults-violating-election-laws/

Mar 1, 2017

As atheist China warms to the Vatican, religious persecution 'intensifies'

James Griffiths and Matt Rivers
CNN
March 1, 2017

(CNN)From an altar in a dingy backyard four hours from Beijing, Paul Dong is conducting mass.

He's also breaking the law. Dong and his parishioners are among millions of illegal Christians worshiping in officially atheist China.

According to a new report from US-based NGO Freedom House, persecution of Chinese Christians and other faith groups has "intensified" in recent years.

"Combining both violent and nonviolent methods, the (Communist) Party's policies are designed to curb the rapid growth of religious communities and eliminate certain beliefs and practices," the report said.

Its release comes amid hot speculation over whether the Vatican and Beijing will strike a potentially historic deal on the ordination of Chinese bishops, ending decades of frosty ties.

Such a deal would not be welcomed by Dong and many of his fellow illegal worshipers.

"Jesus said one person cannot serve two gods, now the Vatican is willing to serve God and the Communist Party," he said.


Persecution

Since President Xi Jinping came to power in late 2012, Freedom House said, the scale of religious oppression has increased at all levels of society, despite widespread resistance from believers of all stripes.

"The scale and severity of controls over religion, and the trajectory of both growing persecution and pushback, are affecting Chinese society and politics far beyond the realm of religious policy alone," researcher Sarah Cook said in a statement.

Religious practice in China is tightly controlled by the government, with the five recognized faiths -- Chinese Buddhism, Islam, Catholicism, Protestantism and Taoism -- supervised by official organizations such as the Protestant Three-Self Patriotic Movement or the Buddhist Association of China.

"Places of worship are registered, religious leaders are monitored, theological content is managed, and annual festivals or pilgrimages like the Muslim Hajj are organized under official auspices," Freedom House said.

The report documented particularly onerous restrictions on Muslims -- who have been prevented or discouraged from fasting for Ramadan or wearing veils -- and Tibetan Buddhists. The Dalai Lama is regarded as a separatist by Beijing, and sharing his teachings has landed some Buddhists in jail, according to Tibetan human rights groups.

Falun Gong -- a banned spiritual movement Beijing regards as a "cult" -- has been subject to an intense crackdown for decades. Freedom House said the number of prisoners of conscience in China is in the "tens of thousands," with the majority of those being Falun Gong practitioners.

"Many spiritual activities practiced freely around the world -- from fasting during Ramadan to praying with one's children or performing Falun Gong meditation exercises -- are restricted and can be harshly punished in China," Cook said.


Christian crackdown

There are an estimated 72 to 92 million Christians in China, the second largest faith group behind Chinese Buddhists.

The majority of those are unaffiliated with the officially-sanctioned churches. More than half of Protestants are unregistered, according to Freedom House.

According to US-based Christian NGO ChinaAid, this leaves them vulnerable to oppression and abuse. In Zhejiang province alone, the group has documented the forced demolition of more than 20 Protestant and Catholic churches, and the removal of more than 1,000 crosses in recent years.

Hundreds of Christians have also been detained or arrested attempting to resist those demolitions, ChinaAid said.

As the larger of the Christian denominations in China, Freedom House said Protestants had been "particularly affected by cross-removal and church-demolition campaigns, punishment of state-sanctioned leaders, and the arrest of human rights lawyers who take up Christians' cases."

However, Ian Johnson, author of new book "The Souls of China: The Return of Religion After Mao," said the focus on the cross removal misses the big picture.

"I'd say that the most important point is that virtually none of these churches have been closed," he said in a piece for CNN Opinion.

"All continue to have worshipers and services just like before. In addition, the campaign never spread beyond the one province. Some pessimists see it as a precursor for a campaign that might spread nationally, but so far that hasn't happened and there is no indication it will."


Warming ties

As the situation has worsened for Protestants, relations between the Vatican and Beijing are at their strongest level in years.

Pope Francis has expressed his desire to visit China, and reports last year suggested the two sides were moving closer to a deal on the ordination of bishops, long a sticking point.

Beijing does not recognize the authority of the Pope, and requires bishops to be appointed by local Chinese Catholic bodies. The Vatican refuses to permit bishops ordained without papal approval to take part in liturgical acts and has excommunicated Chinese bishops who do so.

Asked about the potential for a deal, the Vatican would not comment, with a spokesman saying it was a "work in progress."

Father Simon Zhu, a Chinese priest in an officially-sanctioned church, told CNN "we pray for this normalization between Rome and Beijing."

But other leading Catholics in the region have been less supportive. Retired Cardinal Joseph Zen, former Bishop of Hong Kong, told CNN such a deal risked "selling out" underground Catholics and undermining the authority of the Pope.

Zen said that the situation for Catholics in China has worsened in recent years as the Vatican has sought compromise with Beijing.

"We are afraid it's going to be a bad deal," he said. "There's no reason to hope the Communists will change. They already have very tight control of the above ground church, their hope is to have the underground church under their control as well."

Any deal by which the Beijing-dominated Chinese bishops conference nominated candidates for the Pope to appoint would be unacceptable, Zen said: "How can an atheist government choose bishops for us?"

But he suggested that the reverse method, in which bishops put forward by the Pope could be vetoed by Beijing, offers a potential way forward.

"If they veto (the candidate) it is still up to the Pope to suggest another name," he said. "The initiative always comes from the Pope."


Flawed policy

While the Freedom House report documents widespread abuse of religious practitioners, Cook said Beijing's continued difficulty in controlling the spread of religion shows the "remarkable failure" of its policy.

"It would appear that in the longterm battle for China's spirit, an unreformed Communist Party will ultimately lose," she said.

US Senator Marco Rubio, chair of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, told CNN that "despite Beijing's recent crackdown on human rights lawyers and civil society, and the deteriorating situation for religious freedom, faith communities continue to grow in China."

Millions of Chinese -- particularly Christians -- practice their religion outside the control of the Party, worshiping in private or at so-called "house churches" like Paul Dong's.

Dong ministers to hundreds of underground Catholics, some of whom were dismissive of the officially sanctioned body.

"I would never join the patriotic church," one elderly parishioner told CNN. "They aren't real churches."



James Griffiths reported from Hong Kong. Matt Rivers reported from Beijing. CNN's Yuli Yang and Delia Gallagher contributed reporting.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/28/asia/china-religious-persecution-christianity/

Fugitives in the family: Son of accused Canadian Mennonite pot smuggler

Brothers Jake, left, and Enrique Harms stand in front of the marijuana they were arrested for trafficking in Mexico in the early 1990s
Brothers Jake, left, and Enrique Harms stand in front
 of the marijuana they were arrested for trafficking in
 Mexico in the early 1990s
Enrique Harms indicted after DEA seized marijuana from Mexico bound for Calgary

By Ronna Syed, CBC News
FIFTH ESTATE
February 24, 2017

Like father, like son.

Twenty-eight years ago, a Mennonite farmer from Leamington, Ont., named Abraham Harms fled to Cuauhtemoc, Mexico, as a fugitive after being charged by police for smuggling marijuana from Mexico into Canada.

Now, his eldest son, Enrique, is indicted on charges of trafficking thousands of kilograms of drugs in the U.S. and is a fugitive himself — this time from American law.

More than two decades earlier, he had been jailed in Mexico for smuggling marijuana in his truck, claiming at the time he was set up by his father.

A report tonight on the fifth estate revisits the documentary program's report from 1992 that examined the Harms family and drug smuggling by individuals within the Canadian Mennonite community.

It's suspected Enrique Harms operates under the protection of none other than Joaquin (El Chapo) Guzman's Sinaloa cartel in Mexico because it took control of most of the drug trade along the U.S.-Mexico border around El Paso, Texas, after the death of the main leader of the Juarez Cartel in 1997.

"Those border points are gateways and cartels control the gateways," says Ryan Cortez, an undercover drug agent in Oklahoma.

"And they're very territorial. So did [Enrique Harms] have a connection to a cartel? With those amounts, he had to."
Upcoming court cases in Canada

American authorities have been concerned for several years about Mennonites bringing Mexican cartel drugs into Canada. The most recent court cases in Canada have been in Ontario.

Franz Klassen and his cousin Abraham Klassen were both sentenced in a Simcoe, Ont., courtroom in 2016 to six years in prison for smuggling cocaine into Canada.

Another pair of men, Jacob Dyck and Abram Klassen, are expected in court next month in Lethbridge, Alta., on charges of importing cocaine at the border crossing at Coutts, Atla.

Dyck and Klassen's trial is expected to begin in Calgary on March 31.
The original Mennonite drug smuggler

The first Mennonite ever to be arrested, and subsequently convicted, for cross border drug trafficking, according to American authorities, was one of Harms's mules — a Manitoba farmer named Cornelius Banman in 1989.

Harms had a nearly perfect front. He used farmhouses in southwestern Ontario to stash drugs and money and recruited Mennonites like Banman to move his drugs, according to Canadian and U.S. authorities.

In 1989, Harms was arrested in an undercover investigation in Ontario.

Once he was released on bail by the Leamington Police Services, he fled immediately to Cuauhtemoc, a town in the state of Chihuahua.

fifth estate co-host Hana Gartner tracked him down there in the 1992 documentary and that interview will be rebroadcast in tonight's episode, "The Mennonite Connection."

Four years later, while still a fugitive from the law in Canada, Harms died in a car crash in Mexico.

Some speculate that his eldest son, Enrique, may have had a hand in that accident, although that has never been proven.

"One doesn't know a family's problems. But if money, drugs, that could play into it, it's a possibility," says Cortez.

After his death, Abraham Harms's career as a suspected smuggler was immortalized in a ballad by a local Mexican band — Banda Joven.

"El Corrido de Abraham" goes:

I'm tired of being poor,
Abraham said to his sons.
I'm going to the U.S.
To sell a few kilos…
God took Abraham away
But his sons remained.
Arrest in Canada

Enrique Harms has only been arrested once in Canada — for minor charges — by a Leamington Police Services officer in the 1990s. He was fingerprinted, photographed and then released.

Since then he has been indicted at least three times in the U.S. for smuggling drugs — most recently in Colorado in 2013.

That indictment for trafficking marijuana came after the Drug Enforcement Agency seized 1,000 kilograms of pot bound for a Mennonite operation in Calgary.

In an interview with former Los Angeles Times reporter Sam Quinones, the Leamington Police Services officer who arrested Abraham Harms in 1989 and Enrique Harms a few years after that said: "What I've seen in 1988 is that it went from a guy selling a couple of hundred pounds of marijuana to guys who sell hundreds of thousands of kilos of marijuana and cocaine all over the United States and Canada.

"[Abraham and Enrique Harms] are the inventors of the Mennonite mob. That's the original family. They're involved in homicides and everything else."

The Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics says that one of their informants, Abraham Wiebe, was ordered kidnapped by Enrique Harms and tortured for two weeks in Mexico before being dumped in a lake in 1999. His body has never been found.

Wiebe's widow said she left her Mennonite faith as a result and has since remarried and moved to another state with their children.

Cortez said arresting Enrique Harms would give him "closure" on the death of Abraham Wiebe.

"He lost his life helping us. That's just as black and white as I can put it," Cortez told fifth estate host Bob McKeown in February.

Ronnie Jackson, the former Thomas, Okla., police chief who introduced Wiebe to Cortez, says all these years later the case still haunts him.

"The story of [Wiebe] being kidnapped and tortured, it weighs," he said, his words trailing off.

"I haven't had any issues with it lately but there's times I've woken up seeing it in a dream," he said in a telephone interview from Arizona.

Jackson said another informant told the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics that Wiebe "was castrated, electrocuted and dumped in a lake somewhere in Mexico."
Family profile

Enrique Harms is said to have four brothers and at least one sister.

His brother John carved out a career as a film actor, producing and starring in several Mexican movies about drug lords.

Details are not known on what became of the other siblings or their mother.

A police source in Canada says that he suspects Enrique and his brothers still go back and forth between Wheatley, near Leamington, and Cuauhtemoc to this day, using fake ID, because of family ties in Ontario.

Enrique Harms's current location is unknown, although American authorities say they suspect he still lives in Cuauhtemoc.

With files from Sam Quinones

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/abraham-harms-enrique-harms-fugitive-drug-charges-mennonite-mexico-canada-1.3997697