Feb 11, 2018

Cult Recovery Readings on Cult Recovery101

Cult Recovery Readings


How India and a Shady Guru Changed the Beatles Forever


COLIN FLEMING
Huffington Post
February 10, 2018

Do you ever meet somebody who doesn’t tell you how busy they are?

Expressing how much we have going on—without, of course, providing specifics—seems to be our veritable marching orders as humans these days. We conveniently leave out the fact that we’re not learning and evolving more, and where our time is really going is to listicles, Netflix, carping on social media about things that we cannot change. Consequently, that person who used to take two weeks to respond to your email now takes two months, and it’s not like they’ve morphed into a modern-day Socrates in the interim.

The Beatles were a band that was always busy. Not pretendbusy—legit busy. For their first three years as recording artists, they would cut two albums, two singles featuring material largely not on the albums, while working on tours, BBC sessions, various film and video shoots, EPs, and songs they wrote for others. The pace slowed down slightly in 1966 and 1967, as the band explored the full sonic possibilities of the studio as an additional, almost wizard-like instrument. I always admired their pace, and also came to learn more about the power of speeding up by slowing down thanks to the band’s sojourn in India in February of 1968.

The Beatles, having attained a fame that perhaps no other humans ever had, were a restless collective after Sgt. Pepper came out in June 1967. These were two geniuses, plus two super smart guys constantly exposed to two geniuses, with a seemingly endless supply of creative energy. I’m thinking that no four people in a single unit ever possessed more brainpower. You know what happens when you’re that smart and you’re doing your art and you still have time left over? You start to get a little bored. You begin searching for the next big thing in your life, processing it in short order, taking from it that which will enhance your grand quest in the universe, and then you roll on.

For the Beatles, that next big thing was the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, a guru based in Rishikesh who pioneered Transcendental Meditation, which must have been an enticing concept to four men who largely only knew a constant push-and-pull in various directions—with the world, their various business ventures, each other, and within themselves.

The band met the Maharishi in London in August 1967, then attended a seminar in Wales with him, cutting short their stay—which was to become a theme of their Maharishi-based endeavors—when their manager, Brian Epstein, died.

“Lennon, for one, wanted to torch the guru, but he saved that for an unreleased take of “Sexy Sadie,” which shows that the Beatles were not exactly shy about the use of the C-word.”

Fearful that their career might lose momentum, they stuck around London to tend to its upkeep—which came in the form of the Magical Mystery Tour film, for what that was worth—before departing in February to India for what was tantamount to meditation boot camp. The quest for oneness. Maximum peace. Blissed-out awareness. Purification. Basically, a super-sized yoga-vibe, lots of chanting, and competitions to see who could sit on a mat the longest while dialed in with the great Super Being.

The problem was, the Maharishi was a master of the long con—and one grabby dude. The Beatles, like many great artists, could be naïve when it came to sussing out who might be up to no good, exploiting their curiosity. The Maharishi was very much about his brand, and also his hands: were there a #MeToo movement, Indian style, the spiritual guide Lennon dubbed “a good little guru” would have had to encase himself in toilet paper, mummy-style, to combat the shit-storm.

This is a key moment in Beatles history, though, for reasons that have nothing to do with all of the inner peace BS. Regarding the latter, we have John Lennon eventually taking separate quarters from his wife, so he could better enjoy the telegrams he was getting every day from Yoko Ono, the woman he was planning to be with. This was the same guy who was largely there because he thought the Maharishi might slip him the answer—meaning, to the meaning of it all, right down to where the Supreme Being happened to live. Maybe he sent telegrams, too, and you could get on a list. That’s the thing about a genius: they often retain a child’s capacity for wonder, with some of the accompanying childishness that goes along with that. Lennon was especially adamant to be the one Beatle who accompanied the Maharishi on a helicopter ride, believing that the higher altitude made it more likely for that aforementioned answer to be slipped, which, you have to admit, has a kind of first-grade practicality to it, at least.

But what makes this sojourn important, for starters, is that it was George Harrison who was the driving force behind it. For years he had been exploring Indian music and culture. The tendency now is to push Harrison forward as the preferred Beatle. Hippies love him. They think he was super peaceful, all-loving, all inclusive. This is not true. The Beatles were all fairly violent chauvinists for quite a while, and if you weren’t into infidelity and the sexual degradation of lots of women, you probably didn’t want to be the partner of any of them. Harrison was treated as a fifth-rate songwriter by the two geniuses whose company he kept, but now he was asserting himself, and they were listening. What this would mean is that come the next year, he was in a position to be the musical heart of Abbey Road, their third best album after Revolver and Rubber Soul.

Ringo Starr, who suffered various physical ailments, was the first to jet from Rishikesh. Lennon was skeptical, and McCartney, who was part Lennon, part man of the world, part savvy businessman, had his doubts, too. But as people like Mia Farrow meditated their brains out—becoming, in the process, the inspiration for Lennon’s “Dear Prudence”—the Beatles wrote their souls out. Lennon’s songs, interestingly, were among his darkest, and he was dark going back to the second side of A Hard Day’s Night (“When I Get Home,” “You Can’t Do That,” “I’ll Cry Instead”). The pace of the Beatles’ external life had slowed down; internally, they had gathered creative momentum.

The best artists move quickly. They fret that they will not have enough time on this planet to get out everything that is inside of them. Schubert was this way, Mozart, Dylan, Chekhov, Billie Holiday, and these Beatles.

Donovan, who was pretty good at following other artists, was along for the ride, and he taught Lennon a guitar-picking technique that became the acoustic-guitar sound of the White Album, the double-record opus that was essentially born beside the Ganges. This was a very precise technique, with each guitar chord broken into three motivic strands—a closer-to-the-earth version of the triplets Lennon played back in 1963 with his rhythm part on McCartney’s “All My Loving.”

The break with the Maharishi wasn’t pretty. The evidence of his earthlier interests continued to mount, but the damage-control interviews the Beatles gave after their departure never felt especially rueful. Lennon, for one, wanted to torch the guru, but he saved that for an unreleased take of “Sexy Sadie,” which shows that the Beatles were not exactly shy about the use of the C-word.

My sense is that they knew they had come back with something big. What that would end up being was too big for producer George Martin, who wished to pare down the White Album to a single disc. It’s not insignificant that the band gathered at George Harrison’s house in Esher in May to cut demos for the record. Harrison had a developing musical clout now—which would be born out on his White Album contributions—and a leadership role.

When he was needed most—that is, when the band was just about done, and yet still had it in them to teach the world about the power of a goodbye—he would be there to spark a final moment of collective genius. There is an inner peace that comes with that beyond the bounds of the yoga mat, the guru, the found urtext that birthed a religion. For when the artist gives what the artist has to give to his or her fellow humans, the answer, as it were, is slipped on both sides of that particular transaction.

 
https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-india-and-a-shady-guru-changed-the-beatles-forever

Feb 10, 2018

Top US meditation teacher brings his message to stressed-out Britons

Guru Bob Roth, who numbers Katy Perry and Hugh Jackman among his fans, is to set up a TM project in London schools

Rob Walker
The Guard
February 10, 2018

He studied with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the Beatles’ spiritual guru, and claims comedian Jerry Seinfeld, actor Hugh Jackman and designer Stella McCartney as fans. Now America’s most successful contemporary exponent of transcendental meditation is bringing his message to Britain.

Bob Roth’s new book, Strength in Stillness, is published this week and his promotional tour will bring him to Britain on 26 February. And Seinfeld, Jackman and McCartney are all set to host book launches – for free – in New York and London.

Roth, who is chief executive of the David Lynch Foundation, a charity set up by the film director in 2005 to promote the practice, has been teaching TM for 46 years. He’s aware his field is treated with scepticism in some quarters but says he hopes the book will make people take TM seriously. “A zillion books and apps offer a quick fix – “visualise your butterfly landing on a flower” kind of thing – but they don’t work. This book gives research about why you should take time to learn meditation from a teacher.”

Roth has been at the forefront of a growing and re-energised TM movement in the US. Twice-daily, 20-minute meditations have become the go-to stress buster for celebrities including Tom Hanks, Oprah Winfrey and Katy Perry but the technique is also used with substance abusers, domestic violence survivors, war veterans, children and prisoners.

It is, says Roth, a way of coping with an epidemic of stress: “We mask it with alcohol and drugs, and we manage it with sleeping pills and antidepressants. But stress is like a tumour that grows, and it’s not getting any better. People want something else – they don’t want to take medication for the rest of their lives.”

Fifty years ago this month, the Beatles famously swapped sharp suits for flowing gowns and retreated to India to learn transcendental meditation. But Roth disowns the post-hippy connotations: “When you think what a meditation teacher would be like, I ain’t that guy. I’m a very sceptical person. I’m so not into woo-woo or new-age.”

To those who think the whole thing is “hogwash”, his stock retort is that TM works just as well whether you believe in it or not. “My passion has always been to bring TM to people who are most in need, who wouldn’t necessarily have access to it,” he says.

There’s no shortage of believers. Senators on Capitol Hill, Wall Street investors, generals, and more Hollywood stars than you can shake a string of love beads at.

There are testimonials in the book from famous fans including Seinfeld, who jokes that he initially struggled to understand the value of getting out of bed and then … resting. But the book also deals at length with the work Roth and the Lynch foundation have been doing with inner-city schools, and former soldiers living with “terrible nightmares and sweats”.

In Chicago, for example, TM teaching in some of the city’s toughest schools has been so successful, Roth says, that the University of Chicago Crime Labhas increased its TM training budget from a pilot $300,000 two years ago to $2.6m this year. “These inner-city kids had never heard of meditation, but now they love it,” Roth says.

The US defence department has invested $2.4m in a four-year study of TM for veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder. “Some of these guys haven’t slept for more than one or two hours a night for months,” says Roth. “But after their first or second day of meditating, some went home and slept through the night.”

Now the foundation is about to start a two-year pilot in London, at a secondary school in Southwark and a primary school in Islington. The idea, says Roth, is that half of the students will do two 15-minute periods of TM – called quiet time – each day while the other half are encouraged to rest or read. Researchers will compare the two groups in terms of educational attainment, attention span and stress levels. “We’re all about exercise for the neck up,” says Roth.

He is confident the schools project will be successful, and that quiet time will be rolled out across the country: “We want people in the UK, and the UK government, to look at meditation critically. TM is not like taking an aspirin – here’s my mantra, now all my problems are solved. That’s ludicrous,” he says. “It’s about how I use my mantra to access those deeper, quieter levels of my mind.”

Transcendental meditation

The technique involves twice-daily 20-minute sessions. A teacher gives students a personal mantra – a word or sound that has meaning associated with it – and they learn how to “think” it, silently. It differs from more recent mindfulness techniques in that there’s no pushing away thoughts, counting breaths, monitoring sensations, or visualising. It doesn’t require sitting in any particular position; practitioners simply sit comfortably in a chair, at home, at work, on a train, in the park – wherever they feel comfortable. They say it is designed to be 100% effortless and easy.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/feb/10/transcendental-meditation-guru-bob-roth-book-uk

Feb 9, 2018

On Rob Porter, Mormonism, and siding with the abuser

Jana Riess
Religion News Service
February 9, 2018

(RNS) — I’m angry, but I’m trying to understand.

On Wednesday (Feb. 7), White House aide Rob Porter resigned from his job as staff secretary because a story broke that his two ex-wives had both accused him of abuse. Despite that, this administration had kept him in power.

Apparently, after the FBI’s investigation early in 2017, it did not grant Porter a full security clearance, and he’s been operating all this time on an interim clearance.

Which means that at least somebody in the FBI, somewhere along the line, actually believed the women, which is more than I can say for the White House.

Or, unfortunately, for these women’s bishops.

To me, what is especially heartbreaking about the story is that so many of the players are or were Mormon — Porter, both of his ex-wives, and also Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, Porter’s former employer who on Tuesday denounced the accusers as “politically motivated, morally bankrupt character assassins that would attempt to sully a man’s good name.” (By Wednesday Hatch’s follow-up statement was far more circumspect.)

Most painful of all was the fact that both women seem to have gone to their bishops in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints about the abuse when it was happening, and both had their abuse minimized or dismissed. One article describes the experiences of Colby Holderness, the first wife:

One summer, when she was interning at a federal agency, she had access to a counselor through her job. “When I explained to him what was happening, he had a very different reaction from the Mormon bishops,” she said. “It was weirdly validating to hear that from somebody else.” Speaking about the counselor, she said, “He was very concerned to hear Rob was choking me.”

That last statement seems to suggest that her Mormon bishop also heard at some point that Holderness was being choked by her husband, and the bishop was not concerned about it.

Let’s pause on that for a moment: Not concerned that Porter was choking. His. Wife.

The second wife, Jennifer Willoughby, gave a long and interesting interview Thursday to CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360. Here is the relevant portion about Mormonism:

Cooper: One of the things the bishop had sort of suggested to you or mentioned to you is, “Do you want to file this temporary protection order, because of the impact it might have on your husband’s career?”

Willoughby: Yeah.

Cooper: How did you feel when that was brought up?

Willoughby: I was taken aback. It seemed … not the priority in the situation that I was discussing. I hold no ill will towards that bishop. I think he was making the decision the best that he could with the information that he had. But ultimately, I think it shows some of the nuances of what someone goes through when they’re in an abusive relationship, that because I was unable to clearly articulate the fear that I had, and to clearly articulate even some of the more extreme forms of emotional or verbal abuse that I was experiencing, he really didn’t understand the severity of the situation. And wasn’t able to make that as a recommendation.

Willoughby did seem to suggest, though, that the Mormon bishop’s counsel, along with a police officer’s, helped her to ultimately make the decision to file the temporary restraining order against Porter. So maybe it was not entirely one-sided, and the bishop eventually was more of a help than a hindrance.

Listening between the lines, though, it sounds like Willoughby’s bishop was very slow on the uptake about how bad things actually were, and was primarily concerned about how allegations of Porter’s abuse might damage the man’s career, rather than the danger Willoughby might be in.

I’ve never seen credible evidence that abuse and domestic violence are more common in Mormon families than anywhere else. But I’ve never seen credible evidence that they are any less common, either.

And I am quite sure, based on what I’ve seen in my church, that Mormon women who are abused are not always likely to be believed, and that bishops are untrained in how to deal with abuse — both of which make women less likely to come forward at all.

Listen again to what Willoughby said: that she was not always able to clearly articulate her fear. That’s actually really common in situations of domestic violence, where people who are abused may minimize their own situation, or have difficulty initiating conversations about it.

That is why police officers, pastors, teachers, and other leaders get trained in precisely this. So they know the kinds of specific questions that must be asked, sometimes repeatedly, to get at the truth.

In Mormonism, our system of lay leadership means that a bishop who is in his day-to-life an accountant or perhaps a veterinarian is called out of the blue to be in charge of the spiritual and administrative affairs of a congregation of several hundred people. He serves for five years or so and does the best job he can, encountering situations he’s never dealt with before, seeing people at their best and at their worst, making judgment calls.

That accountant and veterinarian weren’t just hypothetical examples: Those are actual bishops I’ve had. And they did a great job. But it’s pretty unfair to expect them to be experts in all things, especially counseling and domestic violence, when they have almost no training.

Recently I was discussing this reality with two friends about my age who are currently serving as bishops. One was telling me about some wonderful training videos the LDS church has put together recently for bishops to help people deal with a variety of challenging situations — a real step forward, he said.

And then the other one looked at him and asked, “What training videos?”

So that’s part of the problem. What training bishops do receive is on the job — while they’re already serving, not in advance as preparation for this huge calling — and scattershot.

“Most painful of all was the fact that both women seem to have gone to their bishops in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints about the abuse when it was happening, and both had their abuse minimized or dismissed.”

— Jana Riess

Then there’s the other part of the problem, which is that this is a thoroughly patriarchal system that makes it really tough for women to come forward and to be believed as the default response.

Therapist Julie de Azevedo Hanks referred to this in remarks to The Salt Lake Tribune Thursday, saying that the lay system of the LDS church creates situations in which men work side by side with men and might therefore be more likely to know and believe them rather than their partners, particularly when the men seem outwardly devout and caring.

And abusers can put on a really good show, as Porter’s case seems to demonstrate.

The LDS church needs to do better — not only with training bishops but also teaching them that the vast majority of allegations of domestic violence and sexual assault turn out to be true. True as in, the false reports are in the single digits.

As Willoughby said in the interview:

It’s important to me, in general, that anyone who is coming forward with a story like that is believed upfront. That’s it’s not the burden of proof for me or anyone else to justify those claims. And that the conversation around abuse or assault or even misogyny in general doesn’t automatically turn to, “Well, he is really great. Could it possibly be that she is exaggerating, or she’s not telling the truth, or it’s not as bad as they’re making it out to be?” Because there’s very little evidence that any woman would bring that kind of scrutiny upon themselves to share these kinds of details.

https://religionnews.com/2018/02/09/on-rob-porter-mormonism-and-siding-with-the-abuser/

Dr. Robert J. Lifton on Destructive Cults




March 2, 2000 - One of the leading experts in mind control, Dr. Lifton addressed the issue of doomsday cults such as Aum Shinrikyo.

Feb 7, 2018

Manifest three Nithyananda superpowers right now (for free)


Mr James III
Published on Mar 26, 2017


How to achieve three amazing powers of the one and only Swami Nithyananda, Living Avatar of super awesomeness. Achieve your inner awakening right now, free of charge.

Nithyananda, Amritashraya, Devanatha Fraud Exposed: Fake manifesting of gems/jewels

Mr. Noobophile
Published on Feb 4, 2017

Here is the full, unedited video which was posted to Amrita and Deva's channel but quickly taken down when many people pointed out the fraud.



Feb 6, 2018

Brazil police arrest sect members for enslavement



BBC:
February 7, 2018
Latin America & Caribbean

Brazilian police have arrested 13 members of a religious sect on suspicion of enslavement, human trafficking and money laundering.

Sect leaders are accused of seizing the possessions of followers and making them work unpaid.

Police raided several businesses as part of an investigation into the sect, known as The Evangelical Community of Jesus, the Truth that Marks.

The church is estimated to have 6.000 followers.

Police are looking for nine more people including the leader of the sect, known as "Father Cícero".

Investigators said vulnerable and fragile people who attended a church in São Paulo were persuaded to leave their families behind to start a new life in the countryside.

They were told the sect was totally egalitarian and that they had to hand over all their possessions to the community.

On the farms and in the sect's rural businesses they would work unpaid and were supervised by sect members if they went into local towns.

"The reality is this, it's the manipulation of the mind. The guys can totally undo your life, make you leave your family," one follower told Brazilian news channel Globo G1.

"When I opened my eyes it was too late. And there were lots like me. And they had handed over everything."

Police say the church's hierarchy converted the huge profits from donations and unpaid labour into land, houses and luxury cars.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-42969747

Flu season is all in our heads, Texas televangelist says: 'Inoculate yourself with the word of God'

Julieta Chiquillo
Dallas News
February 6, 2018


More than 70 people are dead in North Texas after one of the worst bouts of flu in recent years.

But Tarrant County televangelist Gloria Copeland, a faith adviser to President Donald Trump, wants you to know there is no such thing as flu season.

"We got a duck season, a deer season, but we don't have a flu season," she said in a Facebook video posted last week that's making headlines. "And don't receive it when somebody threatens you with, 'Everyone's getting the flu!'"

She went on: "Jesus himself gave us the flu shot. He redeemed us from the curse of flu."

It's unclear whether Copeland was crediting Jesus with the development of the flu vaccine or suggesting that getting a flu shot is unnecessary. A representative for her family's organization, Kenneth Copeland Ministries, couldn't be reached by phone and didn't immediately return an email seeking comment.

Gloria Copeland's prescription for avoiding the flu is to tell yourself that you won't get sick.

"If you say, 'Well, I don't have any symptoms of the flu,' well, great, that's the way it's supposed to be," she says in the video. "Just keeping saying that. 'I'll never have the flu. I'll never have the flu.' Put words. Inoculate yourself with the word of God."

Gloria Copeland, her husband and their daughter have expressed skepticism or antagonism toward vaccines and medicine in the past.

During a televised broadcast about seven years ago, Kenneth Copeland challenged whether his great-grandson needed vaccines recommended by doctors.

"All of the shots and all this stuff they wanted to put in his body ... some of it is criminal," he said. "We need to be a whole lot more serious about this ... you don't take the word of the guy trying to give the shot about what's good and what isn't."

Eagle Mountain International Church, led by the Copelands' daughter Terri Pearsons in Tarrant County, was scrutinized in 2013 when its congregants were exposed to measles after a visitor who had been overseas attended a service.

Of the 21 people linked to the church who contracted measles, 16 were not vaccinated, The Associated Press reported. The others may have had at least one vaccination but had no documentation.

Pearsons reacted quickly. The church hosted vaccination clinics that she advertised in a sermon.

"I mean I would encourage you to do that. There's absolutely nothing wrong with doing that," Pearsons said about getting vaccinated. "Go do it, go do it, you know, go do it and go in faith."

But in a statement, she said she had some reservations about vaccines for "very young children with a family history of autism," hinting belief in a discredited study that linked vaccines to autism.

The wealthy Copelands were featured in a 2015 segment in the HBO show Last Week Tonight with John Oliver that accused televangelists of taking advantage of vulnerable followers. The show played an interview with the daughter of a Louisiana woman named Bonnie Parker who said Parker had refused to seek medical treatment for her cancer because of the Copelands' teachings.

Oliver told viewers that Parker had not unreasonably interpreted the sermons. He played a clip of Gloria Copeland preaching.

"We know what's wrong with you. You got cancer. The bad news is we don't know what to do about it, except give you some poison that will make you sicker," she said. "Now, which do you want to do? Do you want to do that, or do you want to sit in here on a Saturday morning, hear the word of God, let faith come into your heart and be healed?"

The 2017-18 flu season has temporarily shut down school districts and sent many people to emergency rooms and urgent care centers. One Fort Worth man lost nine fingers and both feet due to flu complications, according to KXAS-TV (NBC5).

In her Facebook video, Gloria Copeland prays for healing.

"Flu, I bind you off of the people in the name of Jesus," she says.

The televangelist, who along with her husband is a member of Trump's evangelical advisory board, knows there are skeptics. She addresses them in a post on the Kenneth Copeland Ministries website titled "God's Medicine."

"Sometimes people ask, 'If God's medicine works every time, why are there so many believers who are still sick?' There are two reasons," Gloria Copeland wrote. "No. 1, because they don't take the time to plant the Word concerning healing deeply into their hearts. And No. 2, because they don't do what that Word tells them to do."

https://www.dallasnews.com/life/faith/2018/02/06/flu-season-heads-texas-televangelist-says-inoculate-word-god

Feb 5, 2018

Prescribing Mindfulness Allows Doctors to Ignore Legitimate Female Pain

Sarah Yahm
Slate
February 5, 2018

Prescribing Mindfulness Allows Doctors to Ignore Legitimate Female Pain.

This trend offloads the responsibility of care from the medical system to the woman. And its efficacy is questionable at best.

A few years ago, after a series of cascading injuries and illnesses that rendered me unable to type, drive, or sleep, I briefly became a professional patient. Like all of my professions, I took it seriously. I went to appointments armed with lists of well-researched questions written down neatly on my yellow legal pad, brought in the occasional medical journal article, and compiled detailed descriptions of my array of increasingly bizarre symptoms. My goal was to get my doctors to take me seriously so they would dive into the complexities of my case. I wanted to walk out of every appointment one step closer to determining the underlying cause of my mysterious condition and with concrete strategies to ameliorate my suffering so I could work, sleep, and live my life again. Inevitably, though, I instead was handed the same thing over and over—a prescription for mindfulness.

My primary care physician told me to download guided meditation MP3s from the clunky hospital website; my therapist insisted that I do deep breathing exercises even though they triggered my mysterious abdominal spasms; and the pain clinic declined to do “any interventions” at all, instead vaguely suggesting mindfulness. The pain clinic’s message was clear—after two appointments and a clean MRI, I was being dismissed. From now on, managing my pain was my responsibility, not theirs.


Before these medical problems, I’d had only benign feelings toward meditation. My parents, products of the 1960s, were always dashing off to the Omega Institute and Kripalu when I was a kid, and I meditated briefly in college to impress a boy who’d just returned from a gap year in India. I’d mostly thought of mindfulness as promising evidence that mainstream medicine was becoming more progressive, more open to alternative, adjunctive treatments, and more interested in the patient experience.

The reality, I now know thanks to years of being denied medical care and instead being prescribed mindfulness as self-management, is quite different. For me, the current obsession with mindfulness has become synonymous with my overall feelings of disempowerment within the medical system. In my experience, in clinical settings, mindfulness is frequently disempowerment framed as empowerment, a way of placing responsibility for suffering squarely on the patient herself and a way for doctors to wash their hands of problem patients.

And I say herself deliberately, because data indicates both that women underreport pain and that their pain is taken less seriously when they do report it. As I was researching this article, I posted on a popular freelancing forum for women, trying to see if this topic resonated with other people. Within a few hours there were more than 100 comments from members, many sharing personal stories about doctors pushing mindfulness in lieu of treatment or diagnosis, and with others defending the practice.

Lori DeBoer, a freelance writer and editor living in Boulder, Colorado, went to her primary care physician with two compressed discs verified by an X-ray, elevated autoimmune markers, and increasing joint pain. But instead of getting the prescription for an MRI, her doctor spent the brief appointment showing her yoga videos online and suggesting that she try meditation. She left the appointment feeling hopeless.

“I felt bad after my appointment like I’m being difficult because I want to be tested, to be diagnosed, to find out what’s going on with me,” she said. “I felt like I was somehow a bad person for not already doing meditation and yoga, like what’s wrong with me?”

DeBoer acknowledges that stress is a component in her physical condition, but those stressors are structural and external: “All my health-related problems started when my rent went through the roof and I had to work the equivalent of two jobs.”

No amount of meditation will fix the increased financial stresses created by gentrification in Boulder. But a prescription for meditation essentially asks DeBoer to internalize a social problem and solve it with mindfulness.

Like Lori DeBoer, Grace Alexander also had an objectively verified medical condition—spinal disc degeneration and cauda equina syndrome, nerve compression in the lumbosacral spine. She was bedridden with her left leg half-paralyzed, partially incontinent, “and in so much pain I couldn’t breathe. The solution was … be positive / meditate,” wrote Alexander. She does use mindfulness breathing techniques to help manage her pain, but those tools weren’t going to reverse her partial paralysis or her incontinence. She needed more aggressive interventions like surgery, medications, and injections to gain back her mobility. The mindfulness rhetoric felt familiar to Alexander, though, who grew up in an evangelical sect and as a child with intense migraines was taught that if she prayed hard enough and had enough faith her pain would go away, “and if you’re not better it’s your fault for not having enough faith.”

This circular logic permeates the way mindfulness is currently being prescribed in medical settings: If it doesn’t work for you, it’s because you’re too anxious and too invested in your pain, which is in fact more evidence that you need to practice mindfulness. And we’re back to the trope of the hysterical female pain patient.

How did this all get started? Mindfulness was the brainchild of Jon Kabat-Zinn, a molecular biologist and meditator, who in 1979 decided to combine his two passions. He approached the University of Massachusetts Medical Center with what he called a mindfulness-based stress reduction program for chronic pain patients. Much to his surprise and delight, instead of being dismissed outright as a crazy hippie, the doctors at the medical center embraced him, thrilled to offload their trickiest patients onto him. Zinn’s program—a rigorous 10-week, supervised, daily meditation and yoga practice—was for patients who had failed all previous treatment, with the goal of helping to reduce the stress and suffering created by living with chronic conditions. Since that initial trial, mindfulness has become the darling of pain clinics and primary care doctors across the country. But most mindfulness interventions in medical settings bear very little resemblance to Kabat-Zinn’s expensive, supervised program, which doesn’t seem to ever be covered by insurance and is only rarely reimbursed. Today, mindfulness has become a container for a series of radically disparate practices, which makes the data about it relatively meaningless. It’s also grown, by some estimates, into a $4 billion industry and has moved from medical settings into the corporate world, the military, professional sports, and education.

Although I was informed by my pain clinic that there’s a lot of new evidence “behind these self-management strategies for chronic pain,” the scientific data is actually quite preliminary. In 2017, an international consortium of prominent neuroscientists and mindfulness researchers co-authored an article called “Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation,” arguing that scientists need to do more rigorous research before applying mindfulness and meditation in clinical settings. First, they write that the terms need to be more clearly defined—mindfulness, as we’ve seen, can range from downloading MP3s to Kabat-Zinn’s supervised gold standard. Meditation has also been known to generate intense negative psychological states, even occasionally leading to temporary psychosis and hallucinations, and is therefore specifically not recommended for certain mental health disorders. Because this consortium of researchers does believe in the power of meditation and mindfulness to alter the brain, they believe it needs to be applied carefully, systematically, and responsibly. They also remind us that scientific research is not conducted in a vacuum, and researchers and clinicians are not immune to the positive hype surrounding mindfulness at the moment, which might lead to confirmation bias within research studies and premature clinical applications. They fear that those premature clinical applications could alienate people from an otherwise potentially helpful practice and also prevent patients from receiving other more effective, first-line treatments for their particular conditions. In my experience, and that of the women I interviewed, this is already happening.

Another aspect of this situation worth unpacking is the fact that doctors are not known for their early, open-minded adoption of alternative medical practices. So why have they been so quick to embrace mindfulness? I have a few theories. The first ones are the most obvious—some people really like meditation and find it useful, insurance companies don’t need to approve it, it’s cheap, and it has few obvious downsides. But I don’t think these are the main reasons mindfulness has become so prevalent in pain clinics around the country. Instead, I think the real cause has to do with the fact that for decades, narcotics were the mainstay of chronic pain treatment. But today, amid a roiling opioid crisis, doctors are understandably increasingly reluctant to prescribe opiates to their patients (even at their patients’ own expense). And there are few other mainstream solutions, so mindfulness provides physicians with an easy out, a way for doctors to feel like they are providing their patients with some form of treatment without contributing to the addiction crisis.

But I think it goes even deeper than this very practical and perhaps even somewhat understandable reason. Mindfulness also happens to fit into a rhetoric of personal responsibility that has long infused American health care. Although ostensibly mindfulness originates in Eastern practices, Kabat-Zinn successfully reframed an Eastern practice in Western terms when he transformed meditation to mindfulness. Mindfulness fits in quite successfully with bootstrapping American values—through self-management, self-control, the right attitude, and daily practice, you can take control of your own life and illness. Of course the flip side of that logic is that if your pain is still debilitating, it’s your fault for failing to follow the protocol correctly.


https://slate.com/technology/2018/02/doctors-are-increasingly-pushing-mindfulness-on-chronic-pain-patients.html

Feb 3, 2018

Exposing "Midbrain activation" Scam: Dr.Narendra Nayak




Many fraudulent companies have sprung up in various parts of India, claiming that they can "increase the brain power" of children , or make them "geniuses" through a 'course' in which they would "activate the midbrain " of children. The proof of children's midbrain being "activated', they claim, is their ability to see when wearing blindfolds. Gullible parents who fall for this propaganda end up paying amounts as high as Rs.25000 per child!

Dr. Narendra Nayak , President of FIRA (Federation of Indian Rationalist associations) has been campaigning against this scam for some time now. On a public demonstration held at Kozhikode ( Calicut), Kerala on 19th April 2015 , he convincingly demonstrated that the 'blindfolded reading' is just a trick that can be taught to children in no time, and this has nothing to do with "midbrain activation". 


Dr.Narendra Nayak


https://youtu.be/V6dDfGqnZQM

Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations

Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations (FIRA) is an umbrella body of nearly 50 rationalist, atheist, skeptic, secularist and science organisations in India. As an apex body of rationalist organisations, it is committed to the development of scientific temper and humanism in India.

The Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations was launched on February 7, 1997 at Palakkad, Kerala. Basava Premanand of Indian CSICOP, Tamil Nadu was the founder-convener of the Federation.

http://www.indiansceptic.in/fira.htm

For 'Heaven's Gate' Podcast Host, The Cult Story Hits Close To Home

Gurneys are shown in front of the Southern California mansion where, in 1997, members of the Heaven's Gate cult killed themselves by ingesting poison.
NPRARI SHAPIRO
January 29, 2018

Listen

Heard on All Things Considered

Twenty years ago, in 1997, a bizarre story hit the national news: Thirty-nine people had killed themselves by drinking poison in a mansion near San Diego. All 39 were dressed identically and had the same haircuts — and they were all members of the Heaven's Gate cult.

In their videotaped farewell messages, they insisted their suicides were not a final death; they were simply shedding their earthly bodies in order to meet a UFO they believed was trailing the Hale-Bopp comet — a UFO that would transport them to the kingdom of heaven.

Their story had a powerful impact on Glynn Washington, host of WNYC's Snap Judgment. "I couldn't stop watching," he says. "I was staring ... because it, in a lot of ways, it felt like that was something that my group could have done."

When Washington was growing up in Michigan in the 1970s and '80s, his family belonged to a different apocalyptic faith organization called the Worldwide Church of God. Washington recognized a lot of what he saw in that 1997 news story, and now he brings that recognition to Heaven's Gate, his 10-episode podcast about the cult and its members.
Interview Highlights

On how investigating the cult was really a way of excavating his own history

My group was called the Worldwide Church of God, as you mentioned earlier, and we had this apocalyptic leader. And I grew up being told that I wouldn't make it through the end of my teens, that the world would be enveloped in this fiery, apocalyptic scene, and that a few of the "callen," a few of the chosen, just a few, would make it out. "Look to your left and look to your right, and only one-third of this particular congregation is going to do it. Are you going to be one of the chosen?" sort of thing.

And so to see that similar apocalyptic vision from another organization — it was so compelling. ... The people that we were able to speak to and that we were able to investigate their stories — the more that you get into someone's stories, the less they become an other. And these were real people with families that cared about them, with goals and aspirations. And they were swept into this cult.

On approaching former Heaven's Gate cult members as former cult member himself

That if the founder of my group had said to drink some Kool-Aid, 70 percent of us would have downed it an instant.

I hope that the people that I spoke to came away from our interviews feeling like I wasn't trying to exploit them. Because we have almost a shared history, and thank goodness that my particular organization didn't end up in a mansion the way that Heaven's Gate did. But I know this: That if the founder of my group had said to drink some Kool-Aid, 70 percent of us would have downed it an instant.

On whether he would have drunk the Kool-Aid

I keep asking myself that question. I left in my late teens and I've tried to forget it for a long time. But yeah, that question: If Herbert W. Armstrong, the founder of the group, had said, "Drink this. This is gonna take you to paradise," would I have downed that bottle? I have absolutely no idea, and that, I think, gets to the heart of why I really wanted to do this project.

On what he learned about why Heaven's Gate members stayed in the group

I think that a lot of people are searching for some connection to the divine. And once they find it, they are going to take that all the way to the end. And oftentimes I think what really came out in this work was that it's the community that really kept people in this group; that these were people that are oftentimes, before the Heaven's Gate organization, they felt like misfit toys. And the Heaven's Gate organization gave them a home, gave them a place, gave them a future, gave them a goal. And when you do that to someone — when you give them love when they haven't felt that type of love or that type of a belonging before — it's not even so much the theology anymore, it's that warmth, that sense of home that keeps them in that group. And community is powerful, really, really powerful.

On whether the Heaven's Gate cult is still active

There are definitely people who believe the teachings of ... Ti and Do, the leaders of Heaven's Gate — that they were divine and that they did in fact go to the next level and get on an interstellar craft when they committed that act in the San Diego mansion. ... There are a lot of different groups and organizations that would vie for the mantle of the repository of the knowledge of the Heaven's Gate crew. And what they all believe at this time, I just do not feel comfortable saying. Let me just say this: There's a lot of belief out there, and some people who feel that they missed their chance when the people in that San Diego mansion did that ultimate deed.

Fatma Tanis and Jessica Deahl produced and edited this story for broadcast. Sydnee Monday and Nicole Cohen adapted it for the Web.

https://www.npr.org/2018/01/29/581532036/for-heaven-s-gate-podcast-host-the-cult-story-hits-close-to-home