May 19, 2016

Liberal donors the Exclusive Brethren deny being anti-gay. Here's proof they are

Michael Bachelard
The Age
June 19, 2016



World leader of the Exclusive Brethren, Bruce Hales.

The Exclusive Brethren church has denied that it is "resolutely anti-gay", even though it mistreats its gay members, and has launched numerous political campaigns against the rights of LGBTI people starting over a decade ago.

Fairfax Media has reported that the cashed-up separatist religious sect, which donates secretly to the Liberal Party, has "virulently anti-gay" attitudes.




Notes from a meeting in which Exclusive Brethren leader Bruce D. Hales tells a young girl she should not live with her father because he is homosexual.

The articles prompted Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull to say, "I've got no criticisms or complaints about that organisation ... As you know, everybody is free to make political contributions."

In a statement to Fairfax Media, the Liberal-linked Sydney public relations firm Wells Haslem​, which represents the church, denied it's client was anti-gay, saying: "It is not".

"The Church has never campaigned against LGBTI individuals or communities," wrote the Brethren's PR representative, Benjamin Haslem. "The Church would appreciate [it] if you could amend our article so it is accurate."



A 2005 letter from the senior leaders of the Canadian Exclusive Brethren instructing members to campaign against gay marriage.

However, Fairfax Media has obtained a number of internal documents that show this claim to be wrong.

The Exclusive Brethren leader Bruce D. Hales said in a meeting in his Sydney office in January 2006 that homosexuality was "unnatural against the anatomy".

In the meeting, with a young girl who had been sexually abused by the man she was staying with, Mr Hales was discouraging her from leaving the church and going to live with her gay father.




The 2005 letter continued.

"God created man for the woman and the woman for man, not man for man and woman for woman," Mr Hales told the girl, according to notes taken by another Brethren man in the meeting. "How many homosexuals get a place in the world?"

Mr Hales is regarded by the Exclusive Brethren as the "Man of God," or "The Elect".

Also in 2006, Mr Hales' brother, Daniel, told Fairfax Media: "When I was a boy, homosexuals went to jail".

In 2009, Bruce Hales sent a gay 18-year-old Brethren member, Craig Hoyle, to a Sydney-based Brethren doctor. In a later complaint to the medical board, Mr Hoyle quoted Mr Hales saying: "There's medication you can go on for these things" to "help" with the "problem" of being homosexual.

Mr Hoyle said Mr Hales had told him to "never accept myself for who I was, and to always battle against my sexuality".

The doctor he was referred to, Mark Craddock, a radiologist, prescribed a potent drug called Cyprostat, which shuts off the supply of testosterone in the male body and is typically used to treat patients with advanced prostate cancer - or in some cases to chemically castrate "sexual deviants". Dr Craddock was later banned from practicing as a GP over his actions.

Mr Hoyle said: "Over the past few years I have been contacted by a number of current and former Brethren members who are gay, describing similar treatment at the hands of the church. There is no doubt in my mind that the Brethren attitude toward homosexuality has not changed in any meaningful way."

As for Wells Haslem's claim that the Brethren had not "campaigned" against LGBTI people, this is also false.

In the 2004 Federal election, the Brethren arranged, through the Liberal Party, to book a series of anti-Green advertising campaigns. Among the advertisements was a statement that transgender rights would ``ruin families and societies".

A transgender activist, Martine Delaney, complained to the anti-discrimination tribunal. The Brethren was forced to apologise, and the then Liberal campaign director Damien Mantach admitted his role.

The Brethren's anti-gay campaigns have also gone global, in a number of jurisdictions contemplating legislating for gay marriage.

In January 2005, the church's senior leaders in Canada wrote an "urgent memo" to the sect's members on a proposed same-gender marriage bill.

"Preventing the passage of this bill is absolutely critical", the memo said.

Gay marriage would mean, among other things, that "gay persons will flood Canada from all over the world, with disastrous social results", and there would "eventually be no barriers to underage marriage, incestual relationships or polygamy".

In another memo, the sect's American leaders asked senior leaders in Canada to lobby in the Canadian vote, saying "immediate action by each US household is needed," adding, "short, pungent letters must be written to your congressman".

The Brethren campaigned in the Don't Ask Don't Tell law change relating to gays in the American military in 1993, Canada Same-Sex Marriage law in 2005, and the Illinois Civil Unions legislation in 2007. Their claims included that gay people were incapable of controlling their sexual urges, spread disease, and contributed to the moral collapse of society.

When former Liberal Prime Minister John Howard - who was close to the Brethren - legislated in 2004 to define marriage for the first time as between a man and a woman, Exclusive Brethren members were present in Parliament every day of the debate.

A memo written by a senior Canberra-based Brethren man in July, 2004, said the Brethren had "greeted the Prime Minister as he left the Great Hall" (of Parliament House), and that "we are thankful for the true definition" of marriage.

"The purpose of the Bill is to stop the High Court of Australia from defining marriage improperly in the future," the member, John Myhill, wrote.

In the public relations firm's statement, Brethren representative Ben Haslem also wrote that the Plymouth (or Exclusive Brethren) has never been responsible for "covering up child sex abuse".




A note from a senior Exclusive Brethren member in 2004 revealing its role in encouraging John Howard to amend the Marriage Act to prevent gay marriage.


Is the FLDS Church building a new temple in South Dakota?

BY BEN WINSLOW
FOX 13 News
MAY 19, 2016


PRINGLE, South Dakota -- A barbed wire fence stretches through the forest in the Black Hills, drawing a line between the Fundamentalist LDS Church and the outside world.

In the pine trees, large cabins can be seen with the word "Zion" printed above the doors. A man can be seen in a guard tower staring out, but, otherwise, no one is out. The only sound is the wind going through the trees.

Faced with increasing scrutiny in Utah, the Fundamentalist LDS Church has been branching out from its base in Hildale, Utah, and Colorado City, Arizona. The polygamous sect has been building a compound here, deep in the Black Hills of South Dakota. FOX 13 traveled to the isolated property outside the tiny town of Pringle, as people who deal with polygamous communities met with locals to talk about the FLDS.

"The FLDS is moving in. They're moving in in a big way," said Tonia Tewell, the director of the non-profit group Holding Out Help, which works with people leaving polygamous communities. "Honestly? I think it's going to be Colorado City and Hildale where the not-so-elite are, and this is where their elite are."

Tewell was in South Dakota with Roy Jeffs, an ex-member of the FLDS Church (and a son of polygamist leader Warren Jeffs) and Sam Brower, a private investigator and author who works for attorneys suing the church. They met with locals to discuss ways to provide resources for people who wish to leave the FLDS Church and drove to the property itself.

"It gives me a little bit deeper insight into what really does happen and it's a little bit disturbing to me," Custer County Sheriff Rick Wheeler said after meeting with the group.

Neighbors of the South Dakota compound have always been uneasy about it since it first appeared and construction started booming. A group of them got together and purchased the property around it in an effort to stop the FLDS from expanding.

"We want to stop that growth any way we can," said David Horner, who lives nearby and chipped in to purchase the land adjacent to the FLDS compound.

Horner and his wife, Vera, said they have concerns that more people could be moving in.

"Especially with the problems they're having in Hildale, we keep hearing the elite (of the FLDS) are coming to Pringle," Vera Horner said.

What's technically a public road runs right through the middle of the compound to provide access to the neighboring property, and the owners gave FOX 13 access. Like in Hildale, the FLDS have erected massive privacy fences to keep prying eyes out.

From a distance and on satellite images, there's an outline for something big being built, with some speculation that it could be the foundation for the FLDS Church's next temple.

"It has all the dimensions for that temple," Brower told FOX 13. "It looks almost identical to the big hole in the ground in Texas when they started building it there."

The FLDS Church abandoned its temple outside Eldorado, Texas, after the 2008 raid where hundreds of children were taken into state custody -- and later returned -- over accusations of sex abuse. At Warren Jeffs' trial, it was revealed he had sexually abused some of his child brides inside the temple. He is now serving a life sentence for child sex assault.

"It was a place to carry out ritualistic rape of children and I believe that is still happening on some level," Brower said.

Court documents claim Seth Jeffs, a brother of Warren Jeffs, is running the FLDS compound in South Dakota. He was recently arrested there after being indicted in Utah as part of a massive food stamp fraud case filed by the federal government. Seth Jeffs declined to comment on this story through his St. George attorney.

Roy Jeffs worked on the property for years before he left the FLDS Church. He said the hole in the ground could be staging for construction for a temple -- but not in South Dakota. He said church leaders have talked about building a temple in Jackson County, Missouri (a place where Mormon faithful believe the Garden of Eden is).

Jeffs returned to South Dakota in an effort to see his family, whom he hasn't seen in years. Driving to the property, he said he saw one of his brothers.

"I saw my brother on the way in, we passed him," he said. "I know my family, at least some of them, are here. There's definitely no chance they're going to talk to me dressed the way I am."

Jeffs hoped to see his mother. He said she was separated him years ago under orders from church leaders and forbidden from speaking with him.

"It would be awesome to see her," Jeffs told FOX 13 as he stood at a barbed wire fence line. "It would also hurt really bad if she didn't want to see me."

Jeffs, Tewell and Brower participated in a question-and-answer session following a screening of the documentary "Prophet's Prey" in nearby Hot Springs. Neighbors of the property complained that the group recently got permission to expand the amount of water they draw.

"They got their water permit for a water system that is twice the size of the southern Black Hills water system," said Scott Johnson. "That's scary."

Neighbors fear that could mean more people could be moving from Utah and Arizona to the South Dakota property.

"I wish they weren't there," said Kathy Fleming, who lives nearby. "But I don't want them to just relocate and relocate their problems elsewhere. I'd like to see the whole thing go away and the women and children set free."
http://fox13now.com/2016/05/19/is-the-flds-church-building-a-new-temple-in-south-dakota/

May 16, 2016

Mired in controversy, a famous Indian guru tries to set the record straight

Max Bearak
Washington Post
May 16, 2016

Two weeks ago, I wrote a story about a world-famous Indian guru — the founder of the massively popular Art of Living Foundation — who had stepped into controversy three times in quick succession after a quiet rise to international prominence. On that weekend, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar (whose doubly honorific title is reserved for the very few) gave a news conference to Indian reporters who baited him with questions about his deserving the Nobel Peace Prize. I'd seen a video of the back-and-forth and was surprised to see Sri Sri in such a combative mood. After all, he is known as a purveyor of inner serenity.

"She didn't do anything to deserve it," he said of Malala Yousafzai's Nobel win in one moment of sass, after calling the awarding of prizes "political." Yousafzai, who was a teenager when she won the prize, had spent years advocating for girls' right to an education in Pakistan's Swat Valley, risking her life in the process. Weeks earlier, Sri Sri had created waves by reaching out to the Islamic State militant group by way of a news release from one of his ayurvedic health centers in Irbil, Iraq, only to receive a picture of a beheaded man in response.

Last week, Sri Sri surprised me again when he reached out through a PR agent based in Orlando (though I suppose I shouldn't have been surprised, given the marketing I've seen of his ayurvedic personal care and nutritional products). The agent said that Sri Sri wanted to set the record straight and that he had been misquoted, particularly in the Indian media. I thought this might be an opportunity to get clarity from a man whose philosophy is centered on bringing clarity and happiness to others.

"Namaskar, Guru ji," I said, greeting him, when the agent got us on the conference call. "And happy birthday."

By coincidence, it happened to be Sri Sri's 60th. "I had a big cake," he said.

After hearing about his visit to the drought-hit Indian state of Maharashtra — where he gave the news conference referenced above — I asked him to explain how he thought his words had been twisted in the media.

"All that I’ve been saying is that all this work I do is not for any prizes but because it is my passion. That’s all I’m saying. I have respect for all those others who have won prizes," he said. "There have just been some misquotes, that’s all."

And he did mean actual misquotes, even though the interaction was filmed. I was especially interested in whether he had been offered a Nobel — only to have rejected it, as he seemed to imply in the video. "Specifically," I said, "I think people are interested by two quotes from your press conference in Maharashtra. In one of them, you say, Hamare paas pehle kuch log aaye the, aur uske baad humne kaha, ‘Rajneeti, usme padenge nahi’ (earlier some people had come to us, and after that, we said that ‘we won’t go into those politics’), seeming to refer to people him offering a Nobel. Who were these people?"

Said Sri Sri, "No, you see, some people said you have to get the prize and do some lobbying and all, and I said no, no, I’m not interested in any of that. Because I’m not doing the work for any prize. I’m doing it because it’s my passion. I’ve been misquoted actually."

The question of whether the Art of Living Foundation, or people associated with it, lobbied for Sri Sri to get a Nobel is actually quite fraught. In April 2010, an anonymous "whistleblower" alleged in a blog that an entire team of people was aggressively mobilized, with Sri Sri's blessing, to get as many prominent public figures as possible to nominate him for the award. The post contains emails that are supposedly copied verbatim by someone who was privy to the "project." A post two years later says that the blog was frozen after an injunction by a U.S. court on behalf of the Art of Living Foundation.

I told Sri Sri that misquotes usually mean that you've been attributed words you didn't say. He said that his words were warped and that he means no disrespect toward any award winners.

In much of the rest of the interview, Sri Sri went on to describe his radically simple yet optimistic philosophy, centered on stress relief. He used the words "harmony," "diversity," "stress" and "happiness" at least half a dozen times each.

"The root cause of violence is stress. Until you can teach someone how to relieve themselves of stress and gain harmony with themselves, you cannot expect a very nonviolent or harmonious atmosphere around them. Family violence and violence need to be eliminated, and the root cause of all that is stress," he explained, when asked about his work promoting world peace. "No one teaches us in school how to get rid of stress even though it is completely normal to have stress. My main mission is to relieve people from stress and bring happiness into their lives. We bring together communities and encourage diversity everywhere — to come together in a sense of celebration."

That bright message was similar to the one he said resonated at a recent interfaith conference in New Delhi, which was even graced with the presence of Syria's grand mufti. "Syria today is the most troubled part of the world. So we invited him to share his feelings and his experience," Sri Sri said. "He gave us a new taste of what could be a better world, or society, in harmony and celebration."

The words kind of blend into one another, like watercolors. Veering back toward his relationship with the media, I wondered aloud whether he thought the media could be trusted. He said that until the controversies, yes, but then the PR agent jumped in and diverted us toward a conversation about stress relief for those in the United States who face inner-city violence. And then a member of the Art of Living Foundation's media relations staff elaborated on Sri Sri's exclusive breathing technique, Sudarshan Kriya, which apparently reduces stress and increases happiness. Sri Sri will be traveling to the United States to introduce Sudarshan Kriya, starting in Washington on June 24, and traveling to seven other cities, including the Art of Living International Center in Boone, N.C.

Sri Sri suggested I look at a PDF about the inner-city work.

And in case I hadn't achieved clarity on his trust or mistrust of the media, Sri Sri added, "The mistrust is because we don’t feel connected with people, you see? And stress is again the root cause of that. When we know how to relieve our stresses, our approach, our observation, our expression ... all changes. You get more clarity, you are more calm and more serene in your observation, your expression, and that helps one to get over the stress and mistrust."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/05/16/mired-in-controversy-a-famous-indian-guru-tries-to-set-the-record-straight/

May 15, 2016

Church of Scientology files late return amid crackdown on financial reporting laws

The Press West Coast
BEVAN HURLEY
May 15 2016

Churches are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to comply with a new crackdown on charities' financial reporting standards.

The Church of Scientology filed their annual returns last week, more than 10 months overdue. They received nearly $1.4m, and spent just under $600,000.

Charities who spend more than $1m per year are being forced to open up their books, in some cases for the first time, under new laws which came into effect this month.

The Charities Service say the new laws will bring greater transparency in the sector, but churches say they are having to spend up to $100,000 on auditing fees.

The Scientologists, who attracted attention from documentary makers in the United States for their unconventional practices, were also late filing their returns in 2012.

Church secretary Mike Ferris said their accounts were delayed due to their move into a newly restored $16m heritage-listed building in central Auckland.

"We had to relocate our premises and that interrupted a whole lot of things."

Ferris, who has been a Scientologist for several decades, declined to comment on his arrangement with the Charities Services, adding their communications were private.

He said the church didn't spend enough to be independently audited and had never been previously audited.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is among other large charities opening up their books to independent auditors.

Donations to the church, commonly known as the Mormon church, have nearly doubled in the past two years to $87 million. Martin said this was due to fundraising efforts around the church's Temple View housing development in Hamilton.

The church's Pacific financial controller Doug Martin said the church was happy to comply with the changes, even though an independent audit would cost close to $100,000.

"I think (the law change) will be a significant step up for some in the charities sector."

Sixteen charities received more than $10m in donations last year, including five churches.

Destiny Church spokeswoman Anne Williamson said their church regularly opened up their books for audits.

"The Charities (Services) ave been very proactive in letting us know what's required. We carefully thought it through, it's something that we've had to get ourselves ready for."

Destiny were issued overdue notices when they filed late annual reports in 2014, but have since been on time in filing their returns.

Brian Tamaki has attracted for controversy for encouraging followers to tithe to pay for the church's 'City of God' in south Auckland.

But figures show donations to Destiny Church have remained steady since they moved into the premises.

Charities have been under closer scrutiny, with more than 1000 being deregistered for not filing donation details in 2015.

Massey University associate professor of religious studies Peter Lineham said the increased level of reporting would make it too hard for some to survive.

"It's getting very hard to run a charity these days. The will may be there to upskill but for volunteers who are doing a full time job it may be out of the question."

General Manager of Charities Services Lesa Kalapu said the changes were just starting to take effect, and would impact on all 27,000 charities.

"The whole drive behind it is to have more transparent information about the charities industry."

It was revealed the Exclusive Brethren church had told its followers worldwide to pray for the IRD after receiving a favourable settlement in a dispute over school fee donations.



CHARITABLE STATUS

* For charities with an annual expenditure of $1m or more: Financial statements must be audited by a qualified accountant

* If spending is between $500,000 and $1 million: Financial statements must be reviewed by a qualified accountant

* Less than $500,000: Can choose to have their financial statements reviewed or audited.

* NZ's registered charities receive about $1.2b each year in donations.


http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/79594715/church-of-scientology-files-late-return-amid-crackdown-on-financial-reporting-laws

May 13, 2016

Is your church behaving like a cult?

Martin Saunders
CHRISTIAN TODAY CONTRIBUTING EDITOR
13 May 2016

Do you ever worry that your church is exhibiting strange behaviour? Asking for more commitment than seems sensible; encouraging an unusual amount of devotion to the leader? Requiring your life and all be given to them, rather than directly to God?

Mike Bickle, author of Passion for Jesus and founder of IHOP in Kansas, came up with a list of seven key 'tells' that suggest a church is behaving like a cult. Most churches could probably do better in one or two of these areas but for some, this checklist provides a dangerously accurate description of how things work. There are various 'cult watch' organisations which provide similar lists, but Bickle's is especially pertinent because it comes from within the church, and recognises some of the nuances and grey areas involved.

So here is the list, with some thoughts on how it might apply in practice, and what to watch out for. Because cult membership is dangerous, and can destroy your life; arguably the same could be true of a church which behaves just like one.

Sign #1: Opposing critical thinking

I remember a friend telling me that he'd finally become more comfortable at his charismatic church because he'd realised that he just needed to disengage his brain during the services and 'go with it.' To him this made sense because his intellectualism was making him overthink everything, but there's a fine line between resisting your cynicism and disabling your critical functions entirely. The Bible and God both stand up to intellectual scrutiny; so any church which tells you to switch off your brain is probably trying to lead you into dangerous new territory.

Sign #2: Isolating members and penalising them for leaving

Some of the more mainstream cults are well-known for this sort of behaviour, even turning family members against those who try to leave. While there aren't many churches which will go that far, there are examples of those which deliberately exclude those who appear to oppose or challenge the leaders from the rest of the community. This accusation was aimed at Mars Hill in Seattle by individuals who questioned the behaviour of the leaders and elders. If a church begins to close ranks against anyone, especially those who have previously been members of the community, they're behaving just like a cult.

Sign #3: Emphasising special doctrines outside scripture

This is especially prevalent among churches which preach a 'prosperity gospel'. Cults use extra-biblical ideas and wrap them up in biblical sounding language, in order to compel followers to practice certain behaviours which are usually nothing to do with the actual gospel. Infamously this often involves sexual or financial conduct, and while there hopefully aren't many churches which encourage the former, there are entire church movements which appear to have created special new doctrines around the latter. From the seed-of-faith evangelists to the megachurches which take several offerings in order to finance a 'professional quality' worship performance, this is one of the easiest and most transgressed pitfalls on the list.

Another key area here is around End Times prophecies, which Scripture does talk about, but in no way to the levels emphasised by some churches and individuals. This line of thinking is exactly what leads cults into tragic suicide pacts; an obsession with the coming apocalypse runs counter to Jesus' warning in Matthew 24:36 that only God knows the day and the hour of Judgment Day.

Sign #4: Seeking inappropriate loyalty to their leaders

I wrote recently about the prevalent problem and of leader idolatry, and in particular the disgraced church leader who on returning from his prison sentence made every member of the church kneel at his feet and pledge devotion to him above the justice system. This might be an extreme case, but there are plenty of other churches which hold their leader in inappropriately high esteem, showering him with gifts (like the British church which bought its pastor an £80,000 Mercedes as a birthday present) and viewing him essentially as being above scrutiny. Unaccountable leaders, with devotees who love them perhaps even more than they love God, are a key feature of any cult... and some churches.

Sign #5: Dishonouring the family unit

God loves family: he's crazy about children, and he's not at all keen on family breakdown. So any church which encourages its members to put the church first, even ahead of their commitments at home, is behaving unbiblically. This is exactly how cults convince people to turn against their own non-believing parents, siblings or spouses; many churches also subtly request the same order of priorities, whether subconsciously or deliberately.

Sign #6: Crossing biblical boundaries of behaviour

Thankfully, this is an area where few churches will recognise themselves. But if your church starts encouraging lifestyle choices which don't tally up with scripture, then start to worry, and fast. Scary examples might involve Westboro Baptist-style affirmation of prejudice or even the use of violence to accomplish supposed 'kingdom' goals. More subtly though, this could be seen in a deliberately permissive attitude to sex or other behaviours. If your church is actually preaching against holiness, it's acting like a cult.

Sign #7: Separation from the rest of the church

Finally, and perhaps of most concern to the modern church, Bickle identifies that cults always promote the idea among their members that they're the only part of the 'church' that has truly understood God's plan for the world. For cults this often means not only cutting their community off from the rest of the church, but also wider society. Churches rarely speak with quite this level of arrogance, but they do often exhibit a related behaviour; claiming that God has given their particular church a specific mission and calling which means that it's unhelpful for them to work in unity with others. And forget what they say, if your church stream behaves as if it's the only true way, guess what: that's exactly what cults do.

Take another look down that list. Hopefully you only vaguely recognise your own church, and others that you know. Try not to use Bickle's helpful signposts as a means by which you can judge other churches though; but rather to note where yours needs to take care not to stray into cult-like territory. And if there's a real red flag among the seven, then pray about how you might be able to help your church get back on to a straight path. After all, it was for freedom that Christ has set us free; cults offer the very opposite. It should be of the utmost concern to us when our churches begin to resemble them in any way.

Martin Saunders is a Contributing Editor for Christian Today and the Deputy CEO of Youthscape. You can follow him on Twitter: @martinsaunders

http://www.christiantoday.com/article/is.your.church.behaving.like.a.cult/86003.htm

FBI raids of Hasidic Kiryas Joel 'part of sex abuse probe'


FBI raids of Hasidic Kiryas Joel ‘part of sex abuse probe’
Child abuse investigation said to stem from 2 videos in which a yeshiva principal intimately touches two young boys

May 13, 2016
The Times of Israel


NEW YORK (JTA) — FBI raids in the Hasidic village of Kiryas Joel are reportedly part of a child abuse investigation stemming from two recently released videos in which a yeshiva principal intimately touches two young boys.

The Journal News reported Friday that an unidentified law enforcement source said Thursday’s raids, targeting the United Talmudical Academy and the town’s public safety building, were investigating abuse allegations.

Kiryas Joel, in upstate New York, is an almost exclusively Hasidic community, with the majority of its residents part of a branch of the Satmar sect.

In a separate development, the leader of the Kiryas Joel Satmar, Grand Rabbi Aaron Teitelbaum, recently spoke out against a bill proposed earlier this month in the New York State Assembly that would give regulators new tools to enforce laws requiring religious schools to teach secular subjects.

Activists have recently pressed for greater enforcement, saying that inadequate secular education at some Hasidic schools makes it all but impossible for students to find jobs and support themselves as adults.

The Forward reported Thursday that Teitelbaum, in a Yiddish speech widely circulated on social media, claimed that enactment of the bill would destroy New York’s yeshivas.

“We should pray every day that these evil doers should not lay their hands on the Jewish children here in America,” Teitelbaum said, according to the Forward.

The FBI has not made public the reasons for Thursday’s raids in Kiryas Joel, although there had been widespread speculation that it was related to the videos of the 67-year-old principal at United Talmudical Academy kissing and touching two young boys.

In March, the FBI raided the village in an apparent investigation of potentially fraudulent use of the federal government’s E-rate program, which funds the purchase of technology equipment and Internet service by schools and libraries. A separate raid in March, in the Satmar community of Brooklyn, reportedly was over potentially fraudulent use of the federal government’s school lunch program.



The Journal News reported that FBI agents spent approximately four hours at each location it raided Thursday, leaving with boxes of documents and equipment.

The videos of the principal were reportedly taken several months ago using a ceiling camera hidden in his office. It is not clear who hid the camera and leaked the videos. According to The Journal News, the Satmar school’s board of directors issued a statement Tuesday defending the principal.

“While this type of restraint may be unacceptable to some viewers, it in no way rises to the level of a criminal assault,” the statement said.

The village of Kiryas Joel issued a statement Thursday saying officials there had “fully cooperated” with law enforcement officials while they were “onsite” at the public safety building, The Journal News reported.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/fbi-raids-of-hasidic-kiryas-joel-part-of-sex-abuse-probe/

May 12, 2016

He's an Atheist. A Satanist. And He Wants Your Vote

Josh Sanburn @joshsanburn
TIME
May 12, 2016

Steve Hill might be the first political candidate of his kind

Steve Hill in many ways is a typical candidate running for elected office in California. He’s a former U.S. Marine looking to reform public schools, reduce the state’s mass incarceration rates, and create jobs. But a couple things are holding him back: He’s an avowed atheist and Satanic Temple organizer.

Hill is a Democrat running for the state Senate in California’s 21st district, and probably the only candidate in the country who embraces both atheism and the tenets of modern-day Satanism. But Hill, who ran unsuccessfully as a write-in candidate last year during a special election, said this year he’s getting shunned by the Democratic establishment largely because of views the party believes are too extreme.

“I’m a Satanist as far as trying to get people to understand that I don’t believe in the devil any more than I believe in God,” Hill said in an interview. “All of it is stupid. But if I have to tell people I’m the devil to get them to listen, then, OK, I’m the devil.”

Hill, who also works as a stand-up comedian in Los Angeles, is currently helping organize an L.A. chapter for the Satanic Temple, a nationwide Satanic activist organization. Hill said he identifies with the temple’s mission, which he described as a “humanist approach that raises levels of consciousness.”

“I don’t go worship Satan and pour milk on me,” he said. “But [Satanism] would influence me greatly because I could deal from a different perspective, as a regular human being.”

In the last few years the Satanic Temple has tried to push Satanism away from its perception of devil worship and into politics. The group says its mission is to “encourage benevolence and empathy” in society while using Satanic imagery to further its goals. Hill says he reconciles his atheism with Satanism by not believing in any sort of deity or otherworldly presence and instead adheres to the Satanic Temple’s goals like keeping church and state separate.

The group has often challenged organizations like the Westboro Baptist Church, which regularly holds anti-gay protests at military funerals and has been classified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Satanic Temple also pledged to erect a Satanic monument on the grounds of the Oklahoma State Capitol alongside one displaying the Ten Commandments. (The Ten Commandments monument has since been removed.)

Doug Mesner, a Satanic Temple leader and spokesman who also often goes by the name Lucien Greaves, said he doesn’t know of any members who are elected officials in the U.S., but added that “every day, we’re being told of new plans for credible people within our membership to make a run for various public offices.”

Hill hopes to be the first, running to replace Sharon Runner, the Republican incumbent who is not seeking reelection. But Hill acknowledged the difficulties. As of Thursday, he said he had roughly $100 in his campaign account and that he’s essentially been abandoned by the Democratic Party and plans to file as an independent. He’s also running in what he calls the “most religious area of Los Angeles County,” an area just north of the city. And it’s not just the party that’s left him behind. He said many of his friends have kept their distance since it’s come out that he’s an open atheist running for office.

“But I think more people are climbing out from under these rocks and saying, we exist,” he said. “We’re human.”
http://time.com/4328169/satanic-temple-steve-hill-california-state-senate-race/

May 11, 2016

Alleged polygamist leader of cult-like Ontario church pleads guilty to 'corrections and chastisements'


National Post

Scott Dunn, Postmedia Network | May 11, 2016

 

It didn’t take much to set off Fred King, the leader of a small, isolated church in Chatsworth Township, just south of Owen Sound, Ontario.

Sometimes he’d deliver “corrections and chastisements” by punching, kicking or spitting on parishioners, an Owen Sound court heard Tuesday. Other times he used humiliation or did something such as squeezing a child’s hand with crushing force for fighting with a sister.

The victims were his parishioners. In one case when a teen tried to run away, his grandmother tattled and Fred King, who was known simply as “The Prophet,” retaliated fiercely with a beating at a Sunday church service.

“The blows were all over his body, sometimes on the back of his head, but mostly on his arms and legs,” Grey County Crown attorney Michael Martin said while reading into the court record a statement of facts agreed to by Crown and defence.

King, 57, of Chatsworth Township, pleaded guilty before Superior Court Justice Clayton Conlan Tuesday to nine assaults which took place between Dec. 12, 1988 and Aug. 10, 2008, mostly in Chatsworth Township or Grey County, and in one case in Peel Region, involving four church members.

Other charges King faces are to be withdrawn when he’s sentenced Sept. 14, Martin said afterward.

King’s victims in the charges he admitted to Tuesday include three males between 11 and 19 years of age at the time, and Carol Christie.

Only Christie, 63, of Owen Sound, may be named under terms of a publication ban, which was lifted on her name with her agreement. It was imposed to protect the privacy of the other victims at the Crown’s request.

After a particularly severe and humiliating attack in front of parishioners, which was detailed in court, Christie ran from the church in March 2008, never to return. Two of the charges King pleaded to related to assaults on her when she was roughly 35 to 55 years old.

Christie came forward and was featured on a W5 investigative report and in local media in 2012 which detailed abuse allegations. The television report led the OPP to investigate, Martin said.

Carol and her husband John Christie also wrote a book about her nearly 40 years spent in the church — Property: The True Story of a Polygamous Church Wife. Proceeds will be kept for her son who is still in the church, and the up to 35 others there, to help them reintegrate into society if they ever leave the church.

John Christie said inquiries are being made to turn Carol’s experience into a feature film.

The statement of facts heard in court said Fred King’s father, Stan King, left the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints over “doctrinal issues to form the more conservative Church of Jesus Christ Restored.”

Church services were originally conducted in members’ homes in the Guelph area. Around 1984 the church purchased and renovated a former ski resort on a rural property at 396827 Concession 2-3 in the former Holland Township, near the village of Chatsworth.

Stan entered into a relationship with Carol when she was 18. She had two of his children, born in 1977 and 1979. Stan died in 1986 and son Fred became church leader, court heard.

Many church members lived in the Guelph area in other church members’ apartments or rented housing in Chatsworth Township. Many were employed at Resto Graphics, a printing company started by Stan King in Mississauga, later controlled by Fred King. All members would usually attend the Chatsworth property on weekends for services and related activities. Some young employees were home-schooled and had to work at the printing plant in their teens.

Beginning in 1986, Fred King would sometimes preach from 6 p.m. on Sundays until 6 a.m. Monday.

“At various times during the services, members would be singled out by Mr. King for corrections and chastisements,” including yelling, name-calling, hair-pulling and they would be told to “sit in front of the congregation with one’s pants around one’s ankles,” according the agreed facts.

Between 1988 and 2008, Carol King (later Christie), was repeatedly disciplined in front of the congregation. Fred King called her “squaw,” “Paiute” and other derogatory names focussed on her perceived indigenous heritage, the agreed facts said. King also called her a “bad parent” and “evil,” court heard.

King slapped her, dragged her out of her chair and forced her to stand in the corner. He pulled her hair, spat on her and once he poured a glass of water on her.

The final insult that drove Carol Christie out of the church was when King learned she’d spoken sternly to another woman’s 12-year-old who’d been “saucy” to her. King chastised Carol with vile language over the phone.

Then at Sunday service King called her more derogatory names and demanded how dare she speak sternly to the child, adding “. . . ‘as if your kids are any better.'”

“He came over to her chair, pulled her hair back and spat in her face. He pressed his finger repeatedly into her upper chest area and flicked the ridge of her nose with his fingers. He slapped her on the head repeatedly,” court heard.

According to the agreed statement of facts, in one of the other assaults King didn’t like the way one victim spoke to him and punched his arm as hard as he could for 10 minutes.

Another time King called a church worker to get in his truck, sped ahead before he could get in, chuckled then repeated the stunt, court heard. Once the worker was in, King drove fast over ditches and potholes then stopped, pulled him from the truck and kicked and hit him in the back, stomach and legs. He then ordered the victim to remain standing until someone came for him. After hours when no one did, the victim walked home.

One boy who’d drawn cartoons and notes that made fun of a teenaged girl was pointed out to King by a church member, the court was told. King tossed him to the floor in front of a women’s prayer circle and repeatedly kicked and punched him, then slapped two others in the face.

In another assault outlined in court, King ordered a male victim to strip naked and stand in front of his mother and another person outside at twilight. King then preached at them for hours, yelled and made fun of him as mosquitos bit him while he wasn’t allowed to move.

Among the charges that are to be withdrawn are six allegations of sexual misconduct including on a young girl and a woman. In two cases the charges alleged repeated sexual assaults. No explanation for not proceeding with them was offered in court and Martin declined to comment until sentencing.

A former church member has alleged that Fred King had many wives at once who were handed down from his father, Stan King. But no polygamy charges ever resulted from the 16-month police investigation.

King left the courthouse without saying anything or making eye contact with reporters while he waited for an elevator in the courthouse. One of his lawyers, Paul Mergler, declined to comment on behalf of himself and his client. King remains free on bail. King’s wife, Linda, and brother Joseph accompanied him to and from the courthouse.

Martin said there’s a joint recommendation on sentence but didn’t say what is was. Mergler asked for a three-month adjournment, saying “my client needs to put his house in order.”

Monday was to be the start of King’s three-week trial but instead court learned he would plead guilty Tuesday. Mergler told the court on Tuesday there had been late-breaking disclosure which allowed unresolvable issues to be resolved, without saying what that was.

Fred King’s brother, Judson King, is charged with assault with a weapon, sexual assault and three counts of assault between 1981 and 2007. He has yet to deal with his charges.

 

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/alleged-polygamist-leader-of-cult-like-ontario-church-pleads-guilty-to-corrections-and-chastisements

 

May 10, 2016

Inside Superstar Machine, Which Ex-Members Say Is a Cult Preying on New York's Creative Women

Anna Merlan
Jezebel
May 10, 2016

A few years ago, as Ashley Cantley will tell you plainly, she was in a pretty bad place. She was unemployed, her relationship with her boyfriend was strained, and she had no one to turn to for advice.

“I was super depressed and completely alone,” she says, when, around March of 2013, she met a new friend. The woman attended the same acting school, the William Esper Studio, and lived near her on the Upper West Side. There was one key difference between the two: the other woman seemed happy.

“She was on top of the world,” Cantley remembers, “And giving me all this man advice.”

That struck Cantley as both odd and impressive, given that the woman was several years younger. “It seemed like, how does she know all this? And some of it made a lot of sense. ”

A lot of the women who joined—and eventually left—the group known as Superstar Machine will tell you they did so during a particularly rocky patch, either personally or professionally, and often both. A lot of the women were aspiring actresses or involved in other creative fields, where the difference between personal and professional lives can be thin. Superstar Machine seemed like something that could help both at work and outside of it.

It was, the young women who joined were told, an exclusive, in-the-know group of likeminded people in similar fields, who would learn together to supercharge their careers and dust their romantic lives in magic. For some of them, it probably seemed like a fast track or a last option, an alternative to the other things they’d been trying that weren’t yielding the desired effects: improv classes, yoga training, speed-dating, the bar scene.

Katie Arnold had been living in New York a year and a half when she joined. She found living here “lonely and challenging,” she says. “I needed friends.” A woman we’ll call Rose—her middle name—was just emerging from an abusive relationship. Another woman, “Jane,” had also just gotten out of an abusive relationship, and found herself drawn again to an ex who was almost as bad. Her career, too, was stalled. “Amber” was bartending, and trying hard to get her acting career off the ground. (Many of the women involved in Superstar Machine are aspiring actresses, or else deeply involved in New York’s yoga and wellness communities.)

One by one, between 2011 and 2015, each of them were invited by a new female friend to join an exciting, secretive group, one that would promise to fix their relationships with men, draw rivers of money their way, and reveal the Divine’s plan for their lives.

At first, though, many of them were unclear about just what, exactly, they were being invited to join. Rose, also an aspiring actress studying at Esper Studio, was invited to Superstar Machine by the same woman who’d brought in Ashley.

The exciting, secretive group promised to fix their relationships with men, draw rivers of money their way, and reveal the Divine’s plan for their lives.

“She was like, ‘Come to this meeting with me,” Rose remembers. “She said, ‘It’s all about empowering women, and you need to be around women right now.”

She wasn’t wrong, Rose says. “Honestly, I did. I’d lost every one of my friends to this highly abusive, toxic relationship. I was just a wreck and was like, that sounds amazing.”

At that point, her new friend casually threw in the factoid that the group, while open only to women in their 20s and 30s, was run by a man. That raised a minor red flag, Rose says now.

“She didn’t say his name,” she adds. “Because I probably would’ve thought it was completely bananas.”

“He’s really invested in making sure that women become empowered,” Rose remembers the woman telling her.

She decided to go for it.

“At that point I’m grasping for straws,” she says. “I think I was so damaged I was like, OK, cool. There’s all these women who are really in touch with their emotions, and they seem on on top of their shit, and I’m not on top of mine right now.”

She pauses, looking for the right words.

“I was a prime target,” she says at last, ruefully.

Around 2009, a man then known both personally and professionally as Greg Scherick was living in Cotati, California, in a house he referred to as The Barn. Scherick was in a relationship with a woman about 25 years his junior; they lived with her young son and would soon have a child of their own.

Every month, Scherick traveled to New York to lead something called The Process, a group that met in the penthouse of the Roger Smith Hotel, a funky, three-star, slightly rundown place a few blocks from Grand Central.

“Poppy” says she was invited to join the group in 2010 2009 by Princess Superstar, the rapper and DJ. She says Princess told her Scherick was a “modern-day guru,” who would turn her life around, “make money flow to you,” and fix her every romantic problem. (Princess Superstar didn’t return an email from Jezebel requesting comment.)

According to Poppy, Scherick claimed to be receiving inspiration directly from “the Divine,” as he called it. The Process was meant to “usher in a new world,” she says, one where “everyone is conscious.”

In practice, what that looked like was a group of women sitting in a semi-circle around Scherick in the Roger Smith penthouse (which sounds a little swankier than what it really is; photos show the penthouse there looks a lot like a stereotypical grandmother’s parlor, all overstuffed couches and cheery floral area rugs).

With his partner by his side, he would “call people on our shit,” Poppy says, telling them about what he perceived their spiritual and romantic failings to be.

Scherick claimed to be receiving inspiration directly from “the Divine,” as he called it.

“I would always cry,” she says. Crying was frequent, and it was praised.

“This is really good,” Poppy remembers Scherick telling her. “You’re letting me in, which shows me how powerful you are as a woman.”

The “spiel,” as Poppy refers to it, was a little vague and tended to repeat itself: Discussions about leaving the “Old World” behind and co-creating a new future with the help of the Divine, a new world chock-full of abundance, gratitude and romantic opportunity. “It was the same thing over and over again.”

Photos of Scherick show a man with white hair touching his collar and blue eyes. He was an unlikely-looking guru, the women who left the group say, favoring a slightly dorky uniform of jeans, blazers, sneakers and oversized belt buckles.

Poppy says Scherick would also stress that the women couldn’t do anything without his help: “The way he sold everything is that women are the leaders of the world, but, like, ‘They don’t know how powerful they are, that’s my job. The Divine speaks through me. No one connects with the Divine like I do.’”

At the time, Scherick was doing private counseling sessions with both men and women, Poppy says (Scherick is not listed in any state databases as being licensed as a counselor in New York, California, or Oregon, where he now lives; this was informal spiritual guidance).

But men were never allowed into The Process, which evolved into being called Starmaker Machine and then Superstar Machine.

“He said men asked too many questions,” Poppy says. “And interrupted what he was trying to do.”

In all its incarnations, Superstar Machine has fundamentally been about teaching women how to be successful in life and love. The path for these women is twofold: tapping into the Divine’s plan for their lives, and learning to be subservient to their male romantic partners. In time, Scherick would also create International Hot School, a weekly phone call where former members say he lectured women on how to tame their “inner crazy bitch,” as he put it, and create a “good experience” for their husbands and boyfriends. (Records show International Scherick, LLC, Scherick’s company, has applied for a trademark on the term “crazy bitch.”)

Two women help Scherick run the Hot School calls, Ashley Cantley says. They’re dubbed “the Super Hotties,” and she found their manner confusingly upbeat.

“Like level 50 peppy and upbeat,” she explains. After International would get off a call, the Super Hotties would take over, leading a conversation about how amazing what they’d just witnessed was, calling Scherick “fucking amazing” and “the bomb dot com,” saying, “We owe him a fuckton of gratitude.” (Cantley was left with the impression that the swearing was intentional, a way of making the group seem cooler and edgier.)

In time, Scherick would also create International Hot School, a weekly phone call where he lectured women on how to tame their “inner crazy bitch,” as he put it, and create a “good experience” for their husbands and boyfriends.

“It was weird,” she says now. “Very LA, do you know what I mean? Giddy, girly, like they just went to see New Kid on the Block. It’s kind of confusing. You’re like, ‘Was it that great? Why are these people so amped up?’”

Despite all the bubbly positivity, Scherick and his helpers didn’t brook any dissent in the ranks, Poppy says: “Whatever he says, goes.”

The women who left Superstar Machine and spoke to Jezebel all say Scherick has cultivated a group of women who served as his seconds-in-command, and whose role is to praise him, back up his decisions, and remind everyone coming into the group that they needed to give him “a good experience.” Part of the broader emphasis, they say, was on “serving the masculine.”

For that reason, there weren’t a whole lot of gay members in SSM, Poppy says. She instinctively understood that she should be quiet about the fact that she dated both men and women.

“Dating women doesn’t support what [SSM does] because they’re all about serving the masculine,” she says. “Even when very out women had come to SSM with friends, they were never invited to really sign up.”

“She’s not a good fit,” Poppy recalls being told about a woman she brought along, a friend who she describes as “very butch.”

In 2011, Scherick began calling himself “International,” Poppy says. That’s the name newer members of the group use for him; it’s also the name of his business, International Scherick LLC.

Scherick’s name change was the subject of a “big conversation,” Poppy says, during a Sunday group discussion for the most “advanced” SSM members.

As she remembers it, Scherick told the group that he had been called “to a higher level of holding his value,” and that his old name no longer satisfied “the Divine plan.”

“In order to support what I’m doing with the Divine and in building the new world, I have to be a symbol,” she remembers him saying.

Scherick also repeated something Poppy heard him say many times, she adds: “He’d always say, ‘This is not what I want to do, it’s what the Divine wants me to do.’ It takes the responsibility for his actions out of his hands.”

“International” remains Scherick’s professional name, and Superstar Machine and Hot School are both alive and well, with roughly 100 members in New York, according to people who recently left, and a scattered few in L.A., DC, and elsewhere in the country, all of whom stay connected by phone. The women who left SSM agreed to speak to Jezebel because they came to believe that the group is a cult, one that preys on its members’ insecurities, exploits them financially, and isolates them from friends and family.

This fall, we were also contacted by a woman whose close friend had recently joined the group; she expressed concerns about what she saw as negative changes in her friend’s demeanor.

“It’s distancing her from friends and her partner, and handing her a whole new language to use while talking with people,” the woman wrote. Concerned, the woman looked up Superstar Machine’s website (which is now largely inaccessible), and downloaded a free clip of one of International Scherick’s lectures. She was unimpressed.

“He seems like a babbling narcissist,” she wrote.

Over the fall and spring, we spoke briefly twice with Shana Kuhn-Siegel, a yoga instructor and administrator for Superstar Machine. Former members told us Siegel isn’t an SSM member, but rather Scherick’s top employee, who’s worked for him for years, sometimes without pay, and has essentially devoted her entire life to the cause.

In two brief and very pleasant phone calls, Siegel said the group would consider speaking to Jezebel. (Scherick didn’t respond to two emails, a phone call, and a Facebook message requesting comment from Jezebel.)

Women who left SSM came to believe that the group is a cult that preys on its members’ insecurities, exploits them financially, and isolates them.

“It sounds like you have good intentions,” she said. “Definitely, I feel like the work that’s being done, there’s definitely a story there. I’ve definitely seen it help a lot of people. I think this is good.” She was referring to the phone call we were on. “It helps me get a sense of you. I think it’ll be pretty easy for me to have an internal conversation and then figure out what the next step is.”

At her request, I sent Siegel a list of questions I wanted to ask her, Scherick, and SSM members. She got back to me by phone a few weeks later, thanking me for the questions while also objecting to a few of them.

“We love the idea of collaborating with you on a story,” she explained. “And I’ve thought of some questions that might help you more.”

She didn’t immediately specify what those were, but did say SSM wasn’t interested in participating in a negative story. “If I’m going to make myself available or International or other people that I think would really valuable to talk to, the intent would be to understand Superstar Machine and not judge it,” she explained. “We would never be interested in talking to someone whose intention is just to judge something and is not interested in capturing all sides.”

She added, “Anything powerful gets a lot of reactions, I’ve learned that in my life. I think it’s a sign. Some of the greatest bands I’ve ever loved, people either love them or they hate them because they were really making a statement and into what they were doing and people had really strong reactions to them. And then there were devotees of the music.”

I expressed a (sincere) willingness to hear all sides of the Superstar Machine story, and apologized for any questions she might have found offensive. She promised to call again soon. She didn’t.

That left me to work out Superstar Machine’s backstory on my own, through the admittedly one-sided perspective of former group members. Poppy says that Scherick told the group he’d grown up wealthy, in New York’s tony Dakota Building (where John Lennon and Yoko Ono famously lived) and then Beverly Hills. He is the son of producer Edgar J. Scherick, who worked with actors like Sidney Poitier and Woody Allen. His family money came up frequently in the private sessions with more advanced members of the group, Amber says.

“He bragged about snorting cocaine off a Picasso,” she says. “I don’t know if he was kidding around or serious.”

Scherick said he and his father were both Harvard graduates (a class roster confirms he graduated in 1983).

“He was an English major and he’d say things that didn’t make sense,” Amber says. “Like, ‘I never once wrote a paper there.’ He made himself into this legend.”

Upon leaving Harvard, Scherick went into the Hollywood business himself. According to IMDB, he worked as an assistant editor on Melrose Place from 1992 to 1999, and on a handful of other TV shows and films. His most recent credit is as executive producer on a film called G. I. Jesus, an indie that garnered mixed reviews.

Scherick’s experiences in Hollywood are central to the advice he proffers in Superstar Machine, according to the women who have left the group.

“He used to tell us constantly over and over, ‘Your life is a story. You’re telling a story, I’m a successful writer in Hollywood, let me collaborate with you on the story of your life,’” says a woman who says she was a member of the group in 2012.

That woman called me from a blocked number and emailed from an anonymous address; unlike the other former SSM members I spoke to for this story, she declined to identify herself.

“He’d say, ‘You’re the underdog, that’s why I love you, there’s nothing greater than a good underdog story.’”

“I’m sort of in the public eye as it is,” she explained, a little cryptically. She called her membership in the group “so embarrassing.” (A little detective work indicates she is someone who has recently begun making headlines in either yoga or the entertainment world.)

Scherick’s genius, the woman says, is his ability to identify women who are in transitional places in life—graduating, say, or leaving a long relationship, or arriving in the city.

“It’s a perfect time to prey on women,” she says. She claims that Scherick convinces Superstar Machine members their problems are due to an innate personal flaw.

“He convinces you that you having problems because there’s something wrong with you, or that you’re not doing,” she says. “But he’s so demeaning. He would constantly talk down to us. He’d say ‘You’re the underdog, that’s why I love you, there’s nothing greater than a good underdog story.’”

Several of the women who left say Scherick claims his real job is acting as a spiritual advisor or a life coach to “high level” celebrities, while SSM is more of a hobby.

“He basically would talk about himself like a really high-level relationship advisor,” the anonymous woman says. “He would allude that his main clientele are millionaires and that they pay him ‘a fuck ton of money per hour’ to come into their lives and fix their relationships. He said he did SSM as a hobby and out of the goodness of his heart because girls like us are underdogs.”

In a 2011 Eventbrite listing, the group is described in a couple ways:



Scherick himself, meaning, is likened, very literally, to Jesus and a bunch of other people, in a description that sounds a lot like he wrote it:



Caitlin is a 29-year-old casting director who was invited to join the group in 2013, and who asked us to withhold her last name to protect her professional reputation. She went to one SSM event, she says, held at a small community theater on the Lower East Side, and listened in on one Hot School call. The experience was so unsettling she didn’t join, she says.

“He’s really good at zoning in on people’s weaknesses,” she says.

These days, Superstar Machine events happen monthly on Sunday mornings at the Museum of the Moving Image in Queens, where there’s a small, unadorned theater available for rent. Lower-level members of SSM are referred to as the “audience,” and sit at events without speaking. Occasionally, they’re pulled onstage, where Scherick looks at them deeply and zeroes in on what he sees as their core issues.

As with the early iterations of the group, back when it was The Process, that usually ends in a woman breaking down in tears and thanking Scherick ecstatically for his advice, the former members say. The same things happen on Hot School calls, where women describe their problems with their boyfriends—sometimes deeply personal ones of a sexual nature—and are given Scherick’s brand of relationship advice.

“So someone gets invited up onstage or on a call, get unmuted, and asked to share her story,” Caitlin says, recounting her experience. “If it’s in person he’ll do this ‘stare into your aura’ bullshit until you start crying and thanking him. It was the weirdest thing. I was like, ‘What the fuck is going on?’”

Caitlin was invited to talk during a Hot School call and describe her current romantic situation, she says. But she didn’t stick to the expected script and Scherick seemed irritated.

“He literally said I was a tough nut to crack,” she remembers. “And that I didn’t know how to ‘properly relate to the masculine.’” She remembers him telling her that she needed to “soften like a prune in water,” to go out of her way to compliment the men in her life and the many things they did for her.

She remembers him telling her that she needed to “soften like a prune in water,” to go out of her way to compliment the men in her life.

Caitlin also shared that she was having casual sex with a couple people, which Scherick disapproved of.

“[With] sex, he has strict rules about how soon you should be having sex with someone you’re dating,” she recalls. “There’s no sex without confirmed monogamy. There needs to be a verbal confirmation of monogamy for there to be sex in a relationship. He said a woman’s reasons for having sex is to get a relationship and a man’s is to get more sex. “

Caitlin was also unimpressed with the hard sell she got to sign up for the group.

“At the event, they pull you into another room when everyone’s trying to leave and try to get you to sign up,” she says. “They try to get your credit card info, your home address, all this stuff. Also a waiver that says you’re there of your own free will. It was a hard copy and they take it right back. I signed it. I had to, to be there that day.” (Other members confirm that within the last couple years, attending SSM events requires signing a waiver stipulating you’re there of your own volition.)

The whole event left her with a sense that something was deeply wrong, she says.

“The way they pressured me to get credit card information that first time—I just had this weight sitting on my chest. It felt like the moment before something really bad is about to happen in a movie. Like, this is not a good thing.”

Caitlin, who’s a casting director, knows a lot of struggling actresses. Those are her friends who joined SSM, she says.

“When these young women arrived in New York, it was like hitting a speed bump while driving 70 miles per hour,” she says. “They thought [the setback] was because something was ‘wrong with them’ and were too ashamed to ‘go back home a failure’ or ask for help. So International really filled the void for them the way some people would have fallen into hard drugs in the ‘80s. It was the love and recognition they were longing for in a very simple, glossy packet: ‘If you properly relate to the masculine, all your problems will be solved.’”

In an essay for The Hairpin in 2011, a writer named Jamie Schuh recounted a similar experience with an unnamed group that sounds a lot like Superstar Machine describing an event at a yoga studio with a “weird dude” and what she described as “his doe-eyed cult of followers.” She said she was pulled into another room and enthusiastically pressured to pay $200 a month to join. She said no thanks, politely:

At this point, I was feeling super uncomfortable and just wanted to get the hell out of that room. Should I excuse myself to go to the bathroom and then climb out a window? “Dammit, my purse is in the other room,” I thought, “and what if they locked all of the doors?!”

Belonging to Superstar Machine isn’t cheap, the former members say. “Audience” members generally pay around $200 a month, while higher-level members, known as “Megastars,” “Celebrities” or “Icons,” (the highest level) pay more. Katie Arnold, who was part of the group for five years (and who, like Ashley Cantley, gave Jezebel permission to use her full name), paid $600 a month.

Both Cantley and Arnold were brought in by the same woman; they said independently that they believe she pays between $800 and $1,000 a month and will lose her coveted status if she fails to recruit new members. (The woman didn’t respond to a Facebook message requesting comment.)

Higher-level membership also bought entry into the “afterparties,” held after Superstar Machine events for the Celebrities and Icons.

The afterparties were “entirely sex-based,” Poppy says. “He would ask women to talk about their relationships, their sex lives, what they’d do with their boyfriends.”

Scherick never quite explained why that was necessary, she says. A typical opener instead would be something like, “All my energy is being directed towards Lisa right now, she’s so attractive.” (In SSM-speak, “attractive” is an all-purpose compliment, not referring to physical attractiveness but to drawing energy, attention, money and good vibes towards you).

Poppy remembers Scherick following up statements like that with things like “What’s happening with your boyfriend? Tell us.”

He never actually directed members to go into detail about their sex lives, she says: “It’s all, ‘She looks like she wants to tell me about it. Does everyone else in the room feel that energy?’”

Scherick had specific ideas about what type of sex was best, Poppy adds.

“Having anal sex was a marker of being a true, fierce powerful woman. The length of your orgasms were also markers of how intense your feminine power was.” In the higher levels, she said, “We had phone calls having to share how long our orgasms were, the positions we masturbated in. People were claiming to have like 30-minute orgasms.”

Scherick’s justification for all of this was that he was trying “to give you a better feminine experience,” Poppy says.

“Having anal sex was a marker of being a true, fierce powerful woman.”

Former group member “Amber” says she witnessed the type of sexual advice Scherick doled out, and was so uncomfortable with it she eventually chose to leave the group. He told women, she says, “to do stuff like get down on the floor,” or instructed them to go home and “stick fingers up their asses, or stick, like, a carrot up your ass.”

Rose left the group after witnessing an interaction where a woman, under International’s guidance, “recovered” a memory of having been sexually abused by a family member.

“She was crying like a child,” Rose remembers.

That was the last straw, she says. “As soon as we were done I walked out the door and didn’t say a word to anyone and emailed them like, ‘I quit. This is crazy.’”

Rose obviously doesn’t know if the woman was molested, she says now, but at the time the scenario “seemed very manufactured,” she says. “It seemed scary. Like something that somebody who doesn’t have a degree or an ability to diagnose people should be doing to someone. And I really wanted her out, too. I freaked out and called her boyfriend and was like, ‘We’re in a cult. You need to get [her] out.’ And she called me and screamed at me and told me I was never allowed to call her boyfriend.”

Rose believes that the woman was forbidden to contact her after that. “We never spoke again. I loved this girl. She was such an amazing person and now she’s just a little robot. They just crushed her.”

Besides mandatory meetings and phone calls each week, which the former members say ate up much of their time, they were also expected to post lengthy missives on a group message board, praising “The Machine” for its positive impacts on their lives. The posts are read by Shana Kuhn-Siegel or another top administrator named Lisa Paris before they go up, the women say, and if they’re not sufficiently adulatory, they are edited and the women are scolded.

There’s punishment for falling out of line, Poppy says, which she experienced firsthand and often. On the message board, a member could be placed in “Waystation,” where she can’t post to much of the board. Members might also be made to stay home from the events, Poppy says, or be allowed to attend but forbidden from speaking. “You’d have to earn things back,” she says.

In the end, the sex talk and the punishments “started to get creepy for me,” Amber says, as did the general, overwhelming stress Scherick placed on becoming submissive to men, and, as she saw it, to him.

“Under the guise of empowerment, he was supposed to be making us heroes in our own lives and making us strong women,” she says now. “But really he was disempowering us and making us do whatever he wanted us to do.”

One of the things that distinguishes a cult from a spiritual self-help group is the attitude that group has towards communicating with outsiders. There’s disagreement about how to categorize Superstar Machine, of course, but it’s a fact that SSM members are subject to an exceedingly strict set of behavioral rules regarding communication, including restrictions on when they’re allowed to talk to other members of the group. Members have to get permission to call or text each other, “Rose” says.

“If we wanted to talk to women outside of the events who were in SSM, we had to get permission from Shana,” she explains. Members had to get permission to “connect,” as phone calls or texts were referred to, and then tell Shana what had been discussed. (Email chains from several former members provided to Jezebel bear that out; they show women clearly asking Shana for permission to talk to the fellow group members they saw every week.)

“It was like, ‘Wait a second, these aren’t really my friends,’” remembers another former member, “Jane.” “I couldn’t text them freely. I couldn’t just hang out with them. If I texted them it had to be about the Machine.”

In our second phone call, Kuhn-Siegel responded: “Are members free to text? That question is not that interesting to me. I feel like it puts me in a defensive posture, and I don’t feel like I have anything to defend really.”

Members also aren’t exactly encouraged to talk to outsiders about SSM, unless they seem interested in joining. The woman who emailed Jezebel in the fall, concerned about her friend’s membership in the group, says that was her experience. “She said that there is no secrecy in this group and no one is telling her she isn’t allowed to talk about it, but that she would only share things with people who are authentically interested and genuinelywanting to learn more. She said I did not fall into that group.”

Rose alleges that the members are also encouraged to rat each other out for infractions.

“If you thought anything somebody said wasn’t in line with International’s teachings, you were required to go back and tell International about it,” she says. “If you didn’t and they found out about it because that person felt guilty, you’d get in trouble and you might be put down in a lower level but still have to pay at Celebrity level.”

“I told on [another member of the group] about something,” Rose says. (The woman remains a member; Jezebel is choosing not to identify her by name.) “I feel ashamed about it. I remember doing it. She called me, told me not to tell them, I immediately went and told Shana. I was like, ‘I’m not getting in trouble for this.’”

Amber also says that SSM relies on “finger-pointing.” When she became concerned about being asked to aggressively recruit new members, (“it felt deceptive,” she says) she was punished by being placed on an “intense” group phone call with other members, where all of them told her in turn how badly she’d messed up.

“It made me feel awful,” she says. “It made me think it must be my evil ego talking, sabotaging me.”

Another time, she says, she was singled out again for no reason she could see, told she wasn’t “holding as much value” as other members of the group. “It was a psychological beating,” she says bluntly. “They would randomly pick on you.”

Amber says the goal here, as always, was for the women being singled out to break down and cry. “You’d break down in tears and cry right away and they’d say that was so brave.” She participated in finger-pointing and punishment-administering too, she says.

“Part of it was the fear of being in the hot seat yourself,” she explains. “It was like Stanford prison experiment. If you give people power, they start to trip on it. It was scary. You didn’t know what was coming at you. These are women you’re supposed to bond with. The unpredictability of that is somehow toxic.”

“It was like a police state,” Katie Arnold says. “Everything you say to another ‘Megastar,’ you’re saying to International.”

“You’d break down in tears and cry right away and they’d say that was so brave.”

Arnold went through a divorce while she was in the group, and also entered a 12-step program. (Several women came into the group through Alcoholics or Overeaters Anonymous. They allege that SSM members occasionally attend OA meetings for the purpose of recruiting new people.)

Though she was repeatedly told that the group was her strongest support system, it didn’t feel that way, Arnold says.

“I was getting a divorce,” she says. “That wasn’t acknowledged.” She found herself “getting in trouble” repeatedly: “I got called ‘defiant’ because I didn’t do something perfectly.”

All around her, Arnold says, “I saw that no one was being helped. I saw mental illness and a need for real support. And I was like, ‘Why are these women spending their money here? They need to go to a therapist.’”

The women in Superstar Machine didn’t seem happy or fulfilled, she said, notwithstanding their breathless posts on the message board about how much value the group was bringing to their lives: “I saw the women who’d been with me for four years being very very lonely. And I was the one who invited them in.”

Therapy is also not encouraged, several former members say.

“I was seeing a therapist at the time,” Ashley Cantley says. “They don’t like to hear about it.” She wasn’t explicitly told to stop, “But it was not encouraged to see a therapist. And by the way, my therapist knew nothing about any of this.” Other women had similar experiences, she says, telling Ashley they kept Superstar Machine a secret from their therapists.

In the meantime, she says, “My life was getting worse.” She took Scherick’s relationship advice, submitting to her boyfriend more and more but the relationship, too, continued to bottom out.

“I was in a verbally, mentally abusive relationship,” she says bluntly. “All his advice was geared towards making that guy happy, which kept me in this really bad relationship. “

Most ironically, it seems that SSM was set up in a way that actually prevented its members from gaining the things the group was supposed to give them: confidence, clarity, mutually supportive industry friends, a leg up in their field. Many of the women in Superstar were at similar stages in the same fields—acting, yoga, the creative arts. But the women who left say they’re not permitted to talk about anything but The Machine, meaning that women who could have helped each other benefit professionally weren’t allowed to do so, and were instead encouraged to think of success as something held in the hands of a man who was financially interested in them feeling helpless.

“You’re not encouraged to be friends with them,” Ashley Cantley explains. Cantley began working as a booker for TV shows, a job she still does. She knew one of the women in the group worked as a makeup artist at a time when she needed one, but wasn’t allowed to just offer her a gig directly. “I thought I would give her a hookup, but they told me I had to go through Shana,” she says. “I was like, ‘I’m doing you the favor.’”

It seems that SSM was set up in a way that prevented its members from gaining the things the group was supposed to give them: confidence, clarity, industry friends.

Cantley left the group after eight months, following an intervention from her mother. She ended up writing a lightly anonymized account of her time in Superstar Machine for XoJane, calling the group “Celeb Making Machine” and International “Universal.”

Months later, she ran into the woman who’d recruited her on the street. By then, the woman was pregnant, wearing an engagement ring, and still beaming about her romantic good fortune.

“I was so scared about seeing her, but it was…” Cantley trails off. “I both felt confident and I cried. I think that was a triumph for her that I got emotional. They love when you cry.”

Several of the women say that the group also damaged their romantic relationships by taking time away from their partners. It’s another irony considering how much stress the Hot School calls place on honoring the masculine. One woman says her relationship with her current partner is still scarred from her time in the group.

“It’s hard to admit that,” she says. “He took a backseat for so long. And then he’s also taken a backseat because after I left, I had so many intimacy issues to work through.”

Poppy left, she says, after she’d been in for nearly two years, and after she recruited some 15 other people, including a close family member.

The last straw she said, is when International, Shana, and International’s partner began pressuring her to be part of a nonprofit they hoped to launch. At first, the stated purpose was to support artists, she says; later, it became about supporting International and his work. They learned that she had some family money, she says, and wanted her to ask her relatives for a gift of $50,000.

Poppy badgered her relatives for months for the money, she says, although doing so made her feel hideous. She started having panic attacks. She had trouble sleeping. When she finally got a check for the full amount from a female relative, it came with a stern lecture.

“She was like, ‘Listen, we’re giving you this money because you’ve been so persistent,’” she remembers. “‘But you’re not getting anything else from us ever again.’”

Her relative asked what had happened to all her hobbies: singing, acting, cooking.

“You had such a big life,” Poppy remembers the woman saying to her. “What happened to that person?”

She held the check in her hands when it arrived, she said, and realized that she was on the cusp of making Superstar Machine into something much bigger than it was.

“I was holding all their power in my hand in that fucking check,” she says. She stood in her apartment and had a moment of clarity: “I thought, ‘What the fuck am I doing?’”

Most women had their monthly membership dues subtracted automatically from their bank accounts. Most had no trouble leaving the group when they decided to do so, they say, although Poppy (and, a cynic would argue, her family money) received significantly more pressure and guilt to stay. None of them ever spoke to any current members ever again; they were unfriended on Facebook, blocked on Instagram, and, in several instances, passed in the street without a word or a glance.

Several women say they are in intense therapy to process their experiences, and two say they’ve been diagnosed with PTSD. A lot of their former friends steer clear.

“No one in my life wants to hear anything about Superstar Machine ever again,” Katie Arnold says. “I tried to recruit all the people in my life and now I talk about cults all the time.” She refers to SSM as “my spiritual heroin,” and counts the days she has clean.

Many of the women say they’re left feeling like they were part of a sad, threadbare scheme to give Scherick the success and adulation he dreams of.

“International’s dream is to be rich, have great sex, make movies, come back to Hollywood and own it,” Rose says. Even this story, she adds, will likely be taken by International as proof that Superstar Machine is developing according to his grand vision.

“He’s gonna love this,” she says. “He’s compared himself to Jesus.” After a couple people had left in quick succession, she says, “On one of our celebrity calls, he said people were going to come after him and ‘crucify’ him.”

She feels bad for the current group members, she says. “They’re not bad people. They’re all just trying to feel better.”

Update, 10 p.m.:

Shana Kuhn-Siegel responds:

Superstar Machine is a coaching program that helps women realize their destinies through the power of effective story-telling. For the last five years, hundreds of students have experienced transformational success in their personal and professional lives with our help online, on the phone and in person. We’re the first to acknowledge that our program is rigorous and it is not for everybody. We are unsure why the sources in your story, many of whom have provided Superstar Machine with glowing and unsolicited testimonials, decided to say the things they did. Nevertheless, we wish them the best on their journey in life. In the meantime, we’ll be continuing to provide the coaching and support that our community seeks out.



http://jezebel.com/inside-superstar-machine-which-ex-members-say-is-a-cul-1775494367