Showing posts with label de-radicalization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label de-radicalization. Show all posts

Sep 6, 2019

Montreal renews funding for anti-radicalization centre

Despite governance issues within the Centre for the Prevention of Radicalization Leading to Violence, Executive committee member Rosannie Filato emphasized the importance of the centre's mission. (Matt D'Amours/CBC Montreal)
Centre for the Prevention of Radicalization Leading to Violence takes community approach, says city

CBC News
September 04, 2019

The City of Montreal announced Wednesday morning that it will be providing an additional $975,000 in funding to the Centre for the Prevention of Radicalization Leading to Violence.

"The City of Montreal is reiterating its confidence toward the Centre," said Rosannie Filato, the city's executive committee member responsible for public safety.

The centre has a province-wide mandate of preventing radicalization leading to violence and reducing hate crimes and other hate-related incidents.

Filato said she hopes the centre will work in a way complementary to other services, like health-care providers and the police, to prevent radicalization.

She pointed out the centre's hotline as an example of its "community-based approach," saying some may feel more comfortable contacting the centre instead of law enforcement.

"We have certain, more vulnerable populations that are more afraid to call the SPVM or the RCMP or even to call our health services." Filato said.

"We wanted to ensure they have a safe space to call and get the resources they need."

Filato also emphasized that though the centre has taken part in international anti-radicalization efforts, the city's funding will only pay for "local actions."

Announcement comes after internal shakeup

This announcement comes a few months after a major change at the centre, when the City of Montreal and the Quebec Public Security Ministry removed director Herman Deparice-Okomba from his role, citing a "growth crisis" and "internal management issues."

The move resulted in the resignation of five board members.

Filato said despite past governance issues, the city made its decision to renew funding after receiving an action plan for the centre for the next two years.

She said the group has seen an increase in reports of potential hate crimes and radicalization since 2017.

"The mission, we need to remember, is extremely important," she said.

The city and province have together invested over $6 million in the centre since it was founded in 2015.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/montreal-funding-anti-radicalization-1.5270458

Jul 22, 2018

IndoctriNation: Jon Atack Part 2

IndoctriNation
Rachel Bernstein LMFT, MSEd

Part 2 of our interview with Jon Atack, one of the founders of the Open Minds Foundation. In this episode, Rachel and Jon dive into the human need for connection and the importance of protecting adolescents from radicalization and recruitment into cults, terror groups, gangs, and nefarious causes.

Plus: A discussion on therapy through maturation and effective non-confrontational deprogramming tactics used in helping Scientologists and other cult members get out.

May 8, 2017

Civil Society Against Extremism – Training

RAN CoE

The Civil Society Empowerment Programme has an offer for you: 28 training sessions around Europe on the fundamentals of online campaigning: key messages, target audiences, online platforms and more.

Dec 17, 2016

Forget about "one-size-fits-all" counter-radicalization policies

No overarching process can account for every terrorist’s personal journey to violence, and our policies should reflect that.

Steven Zhou
December 16, 2016

The term “radicalization” is used so much these days that people have come to assume that it refers to a single, undifferentiated process that every terrorist goes through. The quest to define and detail the specific steps of this process has become the “Holy Grail” mission of radicalization studies in the post-9/11 era. Yet after a decade of searching, most experts have come to the conclusion that there’s no single “terrorist profile” to determine who might become dangerous and how.

Throughout the political spectrum, on both the right and the left, self-styled “experts” have tried to boil down the radicalization process into a single motive or factor: Islamic scripture, social alienation, sexual frustration, poverty, mental illness, anger over US foreign policy, etc. Emphasizing one over the other is often a reflection of political motives or academic myopia, and not reality.

Such reductive rationalizations, coupled with irresponsible theorizing, have affected the way Western governments pursue antiradicalization and counterterrorism policy. There is no overarching process that can account for every terrorist’s personal journey to violence. Different life circumstances can produce different motivations and pressures. Canada’s counterterrorism policies should reflect this reality.

Instead of creating one-size-fits-all policies or programs for every community regardless of specific local dynamics, any initiative that aims to prevent radicalization must establish trust with the people living in a particular locality. And given the often strained relationship between law enforcement and certain minority communities — many of which consist primarily of Muslims — the police should not be forced to take the lead on initiatives that aim to sniff out potential terrorists in some of these neighbourhoods.

Though law enforcement can facilitate systems through which dangerous individuals can be held accountable, the corresponding referral system can only achieve legitimacy if it’s civilian run. Similarly, antiradicalization programs should be branded as community efforts to engender civic and political participation and awareness. The very few who fall through the cracks should be referred to the law by their family members or peers.

Different circumstances produce different pressures


Personal surroundings, beliefs and many other factors intersect in different ways to produce different results, depending on the troubled individual’s immediate circumstances. A young man who loses his family to a drone strike and turns to violence doesn’t share the exact same radicalizing circumstances with someone who lives in, say, a London, ON, suburb and wants to join a foreign terrorist group.

Being able to help youth (or even adults) distance themselves from harmful ideological or sociopolitical influences means getting a close-up picture of their lives. It’s usually impossible to obtain such a glimpse without the trust of their parents or close friends.

In fact, this is a dynamic that Canada’s intelligence agencies are familiar with. In 2010-11, CSIS undertook a large study that looked into how radicalization works throughout the country. It found that immigrant communities usually have very little direct relationship to terrorism and that mosques, among other mainstream religious venues, are almost never incubators for terrorism or radicalization.

In Canada, those who become radicalized are almost never marginalized members of their communities and often have a high level of education. Yet Muslim Canadians have often complained about how their public spaces of worship have become places of suspicion. To quote a column by the Globe and Mail’s Doug Saunders, who wrote about the CSIS study, Canada is looking for terrorists in “all the wrong places.”

Instead of spouting their radical beliefs in mosques, where lots of different people gather to worship and where religious leaders keep an eye on the congregation, those who are vulnerable to radicalizing factors undergo a highly individualized process in their private spaces, often with the help of the Internet.

These conclusions are almost identical with a major MI5 study conducted in 2008, which looked at hundreds of case studies. The agency’s behavioural science unit notes that there is no “single pathway” to terrorism and that would-be radicals are usually religious novices who neglect going to places of worship or other mainstream faith-based venues.

Easier said than done


The Toronto Police Service revealed this week that it’s been operating a secret radicalization prevention program for more than two years. Police officers and “participating agencies” have been referring youth who they deem to be in danger of radicalization to one of four deradicalization “hubs” across the city. Several experts then work with the individual to take him or her off the path of extremism.

Any effort to prevent or curb extremism will invite communal suspicion if branded explicitly as such. To maximize legitimacy, future programs should be local efforts that privilege communal input. Groups that participate should identify themselves and work with parents, community leaders and other civilians to identify/refer troubled youth.

This latest effort in Toronto is just Canada’s latest attempt at getting counterterrorism right. The Trudeau government has set aside $35 million for counter-radicalization efforts and Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale is sourcing public opinion on public safety strategies via his national consultations. All this will be in vain if the Canadian establishment doesn’t take the latest conclusions on radicalization seriously and try to implement policies that reflect these findings.

Getting the right balance of community-sourced human intelligence, signals intelligence (interception of electronic communications) and heavy-handed law enforcement isn’t easy. But Canada has no chance of putting together a useful program if the police and intelligence agencies are not totally upfront and transparent with the communities on which they focus.

A way forward


Instead of focusing on secretive programs that spy on entire congregations, or on efforts to assemble anonymous experts in unidentified “hubs,” the government should make an overtly public effort to fund community spaces that facilitate open political discussions and civic engagement, particularly in minority communities. Not only will this help curb extremism itself by providing local outlets, it will show that the Canadian establishment is interested in the political and social grievances of those who often feel left out of the national conversation.

The Toronto Police Service has noted that it has not gotten many cases for its program to work on, but that could be because the Muslim community, among others, don’t trust that the police are there to help. Youth who are referred for “treatment” by this program participate on a voluntary basis, but the Toronto police haven’t disclosed which civilian agencies are and have been participating in the program for the past two years. Nor have they revealed their list of “103 risk factors” that are supposed to assist the anonymous experts who work in each “hub” to identify radicalizing individuals and deradicalize them.

This opaqueness doesn’t help because it doesn’t foster trust. In order to implement policies that try to tackle this problem from the ground up, Canada’s national security apparatus should source information and input directly from community members through constant communication. Trusted community members (teachers, social workers, academics, etc.) who possess a respectable degree of political acumen can help formulate programs that develop political awareness and engagement among youth.

http://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/december-2016/forget-about-one-size-fits-all-counter-radicalization-policies/

Aug 27, 2016

Mark Bourrie: Deprogramming the jihadi

Mark Bourrie, Special to National Post | August 25, 2016 

 

To those who are involved and listen to this movie, this is in retaliation for Afghanistan and because Harper wants to send his troops to Iraq. So we are retaliating, the Mujahedin of this world. Canada’s officially become one of our enemies by fighting and bombing us and creating a lot of terror in our countries and killing us and killing our innocents. So, just aiming to hit some soldiers just to show that you’re not even safe in your own land, and you gotta be careful.

So, may Allah accept from us. It’s a disgrace you guys have forgotten God and have you let every indecency and things running your land. We don’t, we don’t go for this. We are good people, righteous people, believers of God and believing his law and his Prophets, peace be upon them all. That’s my message to all of you in this, Inshallah, we’ll not cease until you guys decide to be a peaceful country and stay to your own and I — and stop going to other countries and stop occupying and killing the righteous of us who are trying to bring back religious law in our countries. Thank you.

— Michael Zehalf-Bibeau in his video message to Canadians, filmed a few minutes before he shot up Parliament Hill.

It’s such a Canadian thing, to say “thank you” to the people you tried to murder.

Kristel Peters was pushing her nine-month-old baby past Canada’s National War Memorial on her way to visit her husband at a downtown Ottawa construction project when the world went crazy. “I saw a man who seemed to me dressed in black,” she told a reporter many months later. “He had a big rifle. I thought that it was a show until I realized that a person fell at the time.”

Michael Zehaf-Bibeau was standing over Canadian army reservist Cpl. Nathan Cirillo, firing bullet after bullet into his back. Cirillo, wearing the kilt of Cameron Highlanders, was a ceremonial guard at the memorial and the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at its base. The Canadian military had opposed the idea of posting unarmed guards at the monuments, saying they would attract this kind of attack, but Stephen Harper’s government had insisted on it after a drunk had urinated on the War Memorial during a Canada Day street party. Cirillo could not defend himself and his partner, also carrying an empty rifle, could not save him. The wounded man tried to crawl away and find shelter at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, but Zehaf-Bibeau kept following and firing into the corporal’s back. When it was clear Cirillo was dying, Zehaf-Bibeau turned toward the Langevin Block, the building that’s home to the Prime Minister’s office, and shouted the word “Iraq.” Peters, the 35-year-old mother, finally realized what was happening, turned in terror and ran toward a place she thought would be safe: Parliament Hill.

Canada was lucky that the man who attacked the nation’s parliament was as inept as Zehaf-Bibeau. He had scouted the Parliament building before his attack, but he didn’t really know his way around. When he did storm the building, he ran in the one direction where there are rarely politicians: toward the library. If he had come an hour earlier, he would have stumbled across almost every member of Parliament and senator as they walked into two giant meeting rooms for their weekly caucus meetings. He would also have come across a mass of reporters trying to “scrum” the politicians.

There had been no increase in the level of security on Parliament Hill after the murder, just two days before, of Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent by Muslim convert and self-styled jihadi Martin Couture-Rouleau. He and another soldier were run over near the military base at St- Jean-sur-Richelieu, just south of Montreal. Both these attacks were inspired by the call sent out through (the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant’s) propaganda machine to attack the West. It’s likely Bibeau and Couture-Rouleau had been inspired by a call to arms made by Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, ISIL’s chief spokesman, in late September, 2014. Certainly, ISIL’s propaganda machine wanted people to think so. Al-Adnani was reacting in a rage to Allied bombing of ISIL military and economic targets. He wanted jihadis who hadn’t yet made the trek to ISIL territory to lash out against Western targets.

In a 42-minute audio speech posted on the Internet and linked to by ISIL’s Twitter and Facebook network, al-Adnani urged ISIL supporters to kill Canadians, Americans, Australians, the French and other Europeans. It didn’t matter if they were civilians or soldiers.

Does Canada do enough to diffuse radicalism and prevent its nationals from travelling to failing states to join extremists? The answer is obvious.

In February 2015, Lorne Dawson, co-director of the Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security and Society (TSAS), told a Senate committee examining security threats to this country that Canadian police and policy makers simply don’t understand jihadi recruitment well enough to create effective counter-measures. At about the same time, Conservative senator Daniel Lang told delegates to a public policy conference, “We need to recognize that radicalized thoughts lead to radicalized actions.” Dawson told the senators that extremists can be found fairly easily, but it’s far more difficult to predict which ones will actually break the law. Research on radicalization, Dawson said, shows very few radicalized people will ever have anything to do with violence. Most draw spiritual sustenance from their religion without feeling a need to kill for it.

But attacks by extremists seem to generate interest in Islam as a go-to religion/political cause for people who are dissatisfied and who don’t feel attracted to the anarchism of groups like Black Bloc. The imam of Ottawa’s largest mosque reported 15 to 20 young people approached him for conversion to Islam in the first few weeks after the attack on Parliament Hill.

Amarnath Amarasingam, one of Canada’s leading researchers on ISIL recruitment, says ISIL’s claim to be the new caliphate offers Muslims and non-Muslims an intriguing and exciting new project. It “was seen as the fulfillment of a prophecy … It became incumbent on Muslims around the world to fight for this and build the new fledgling state. “Those who join are looking for “significance, meaning and belonging.”

Ottawa imam Imtiaz Ahmed said Muslims need to watch for trouble in their own congregations: “If we hear someone expressing sympathy for ISIL, we should tell the authorities. We don’t want these young men to hurt themselves or their fellow Canadians. We have seen new converts going abroad. (Ottawa jihadi John) Maguire looks intelligent, and he got good grades in university. What makes him think what he is doing is right? Who would have thought that the proverbial boy next door could become a radical militant? Obviously he is getting ideas from somewhere — at university or on the Internet. We have to find out where. But these people have an agenda of harming Canadians and harming our country, so we should be the first to report them.”

People in the counter-jihad business have spent a lot of time and money looking at ways to identify radicalized young people and de-program them. They see radical Islam as a cult that cleverly recruits troubled and bored people, isolates them and exploits them. Jocelyn Bélanger, a psychology professor at Université du Québec à Montréal, studies de-radicalization. He advised the Senate National Security Committee to advise the government to come up with policies that don’t treat radicalized young people as potential criminals or psychiatric patients, but as people with social needs that have not been met.

Canada does have some historical experience dealing with young people who grew up steeped in a radical, violent philosophy. The country was dotted with prisoner of war camps during the Second World War. Canadian soldiers and propaganda experts waged a tough war with hard-core Nazis to win over German soldiers. It wasn’t easy. At first, the Canadians tried segregating the prisoners, weeding out the most diehard Nazis. That did not work. Canadians also, with the help of anti-Nazi PoWs, wrote propaganda and distributed it in camps. PoWs were also shown films and made to sit through speeches. None of those tactics worked, either. The only prisoners who seemed to change were the men who were taken out of the camps to work on farms and logging camps across the country. Not only did they realize they’d been lied to by the German propaganda machine, many of them liked Canada so much that they immigrated to this country in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Some even chose to live in remote northern Ontario towns close to their now-closed PoW camps.

Many parents of Westerners who have joined jihadi groups would like to see some efforts directed at deprogramming. They say police only see jihadi recruitment as a crime problem. So far, the deprogramming — treating people on the road to extremism as though they have been seduced by a cult, and trying to help them understand and resist what’s happening to them — has taken place very sporadically. Not only do most activists and agencies lack the money for long and expensive interventions, they have to accept the fact that someone who reads jihadi literature and agrees with it has committed no crime. People have a right to their religious beliefs, and many of the rights we have were won by people who refused to conform to the beliefs of the prevailing sources of power and moral authority.

The RCMP has to balance factions within Canada’s Islamic community. They also have to build trust with people who feel pressured by mainstream media, right-wing antagonists, and even some Muslim converts. Calgary imam Syed Soharwardy says police haven’t made a dent in ISIL recruitment, which he calls brainwashing. “Why has intelligence failed to stop them? Who funded them? This is a very important question. A national enquiry would be able to find that out.” Soharwardy’s hard line attracted the attention of John Maguire, who sent him threatening Facebook messages in August 2014, calling him a deviant Muslim supporting an infidel government. “He said, ‘Syed Soharwadry, shame on you; you are a deviant imam; you are supporting an infidel government and shame on you. We are fighting for Islam and we are trying to establish the Islamic government, and you are misguiding people.’ ”

Excerpted from The Killing Game: Martyrdom, Murder and the Lure of Isis, by Mark Bourrie. Patrick Crean Editions, HarperCollins Canada 2016. Reprinted with permission.

 

http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/mark-bourrie-deprogramming-the-jidhadi

 

Aug 26, 2016

De-radicalisation project sets up in Finland


YLE UUTISET
August 8, 2016

A new project in Finland aims to help people caught up in radical political or religious ideologies. The Radinet scheme is targeting those radicalised by extremist dogma, including far-right and Islamist extremist literature.

Those involved in extremist activities may soon be helped to renounce violence by a new so-called 'exit' organisation. The Radinet project is funded by the RAY slot machine association, and is the result of collaboration between the Interior Ministry and several organisations opposed to violence.

The goal of the Radinet programme is to help radicalised individuals renounce violence and extremism. Esa Holappa, a neo-Nazi leader who recently left far right politics, is an advisor on the project. The scheme will also aim to help Finns who've left to fight in Syria to leave extremist ideologies behind them.

The project has been running since January, and already has dozens of clients among at-risk groups. The organisation has two full-time workers, one based in Oulu and one in Helsinki, along with Holappa who offers his expert advice.

http://yle.fi/uutiset/de-radicalisation_project_sets_up_in_finland/9120702

Aug 15, 2016

Brainwashed would-be foreign fighter Amin Mohamed now wants to help other

Jane Lee
The Age
August 15, 2016

Amin Mohamed, 25, says he was brainwashed and now wants to help other young Muslims.
A would-be foreign fighter found guilty of planning to travel to war-torn Syria says he was brainwashed by a "homewrecker" and now wants to help young Muslims at risk of being radicalised, a court has heard.

Amin Mohamed, 25, a New Zealand citizen originally from Somalia, faces up to 10 years' jail after a Supreme Court jury last year convicted him of three counts of preparing to enter a foreign state to engage in hostile activities.

The case against Mohamed relied on intercepted phone calls recorded by police between him and alleged Sydney-based recruiter Hamdi Al Qudsi.

Mohamed's barrister Julian McMahon told Victoria's Supreme Court on Monday his client was a reformed offender, who accepted he had been "brainwashed or radicalised" and wanted to help other vulnerable youths.

"[He] now understands that extremists do prey on young vulnerable people such as he was, and he wants to do what he can to assist people who are in the position that he found himself back at that time," Mr McMahon said.

He said Mohamed had also realised that Al-Qudsi was a "homewrecker", who was "sending young men to a danger zone".

Mr McMahon said his client had the rare support of a number of friends who were in court on Monday.

Mohamed was stopped at Brisbane's international airport in 2013 trying to board a Turkey-bound flight. He had claimed he was going to Denmark via Turkey to meet his fiancee, whom he had never met.

However, Crown prosecutor Lesley Taylor, QC, said Mohamed had shown no remorse.

She said none of the character references tendered to the court suggested Mohamed regretted trying to go to Syria to fight, only that he regretted trying to migrate to a Muslim country.

Ms Taylor said Justice Lex Lasry could consider sentencing principles that apply to terrorism offences, which carry a penalty of life imprisonment.

Mr McMahon strongly disagreed, saying Mohamed had engaged in different "class of offending", which involved "very early preparatory conduct" for non-specific activities in Syria.

This could not be seen as very serious, Mr McMahon said, given his client was freed at the airport and only charged months later, and that bail was not opposed at the time.

Justice Lasry said the word "radicalisation" was unfortunate.

"Radicalisation seems to be primarily the product of, among others, opportunistic politicians," he said.

He said radicalised youth were "indistinguishable from any other young person who for one reason or another - perhaps the consumption of drugs or whatever else - commits other crime."

The judge ordered Mohamed be returned to immigration detention until he is sentenced.

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/brainwashed-wouldbe-foreign-fighter-amin-mohamed-now-wants-to-help-other-young-muslims-20160815-gqst9e.html

Apr 15, 2016

How To Lose Your Mind To ISIS And Then Fight To Get It Back

Mike GiglioBuzzFeed
April 13, 2016

It’s far easier to join ISIS than to leave. Members of a hidden community of ISIS defectors recount how they were pulled into the grip of extremism — and their struggle to escape. Mike Giglio and Munzer al-Awad report for BuzzFeed News from the Syrian border.

isis


SANLIURFA, Turkey — A black scarf wrapped around his head, Okab charged into the dusty town of Sinjar leading a platoon of ISIS jihadis. He felt the familiar sensation of drawing closer to God and the rush of knowing he was just a bullet from paradise.

It was before dawn on August 3, 2014, and the militants were beginning their assault on the ancient home of the Yazidi religious minority in northern Iraq. A veteran of ISIS’s wars, the young field commander expected fierce resistance from the local militia that controlled the town. But the militia had retreated, and the streets of Sinjar, at the foot of the towering mountain of the same name, were empty.

Then his fellow jihadis began to drag Yazidi civilians from their homes, shouting kafir, or infidel. They beheaded men in front of their screaming families. They tied up women and children and dragged them into cars. Scenes of carnage seared into Okab’s mind. In one, more than 50 Yazidi men lay facedown in a roadside ditch, hands bound behind their backs, as his comrades drew their automatic weapons and executed them.

The massacre of the Yazidis was an act of barbarism that sparked outrage worldwide. More than 3,000 civilians were killed, according to one prominent Yazidi rights group, and at least 5,000 more taken hostage, many of them women to be used as sex slaves, as part of what the U.S. has called a genocide. With ISIS pushing on from Sinjar town toward the fleeing Yazidis who were massed on top of the mountain, the U.S. began airstrikes against the militants, drawing America and its allies into a new war. The massacre was a rallying cry for ISIS too — an advertisement for its brutal brand of extremism that brought news headlines and recruits, while at the same time feeding the fervor of the fighters in its ranks.

For Okab, though, the massacre was a blow to his conscience that snapped him from ISIS’s spell.

He was horrified. Who gave this command? he asked the fighters around him. Why are you doing this?

Each time he received the same simple reply: These people are infidels.

He realized then that he would abandon the group — and the idea made him afraid. He began to wonder who might detect his newfound dissent. ISIS reserved some of its harshest treatment, he knew, for its own members suspected of wanting to defect.

He rushed back to his base in the Iraqi city of Mosul. Then he crossed to his native Syria and returned to Raqqa, the ISIS capital in the country, where he began the long and difficult process of detaching from the group to which he’d pledged his life.

Now Okab is part of a hidden community of defectors scattered across the globe — inside Iraq and Syria, in neighboring countries like Turkey, and, in the cases of former foreign fighters, back at home. They live in the shadows, fearful of retribution from ISIS on the one hand and, on the other, of arrest, thanks to their history with the terror group. As they reclaim their minds from the grip of fanaticism, they’re left to wonder how they could have taken part in such terrible crimes. “Maybe you think they are bad people because they joined ISIS. But for me, they are my brothers,” Okab said on a recent night near the border in southern Turkey, where he lives today. “Because the same thing that happened to them happened to me.”

Since defectors keep off the radar, their voices are seldom heard, robbing potential recruits of a reality check against the lure of ISIS propaganda and would-be defectors of the examples others have set. But rare interviews with six defectors, as well as two men working to help more escape, reveal the cracks quietly forming in the ISIS ranks. All have been granted anonymity to protect their safety, both from ISIS and from arrest, and Okab asked to go by an old nickname, which means “eagle,” because it’s known only to trusted friends.

Each spoke from a different stage of a lonely recovery. One had given up the war in hopes of starting fresh in Europe, while another was still in the thrall of ISIS’s calls for sectarian bloodshed. A 13-year-old boy, rescued from ISIS by his family, remained obsessed with the idea of murdering his so-called infidel neighbors and friends.

Their stories offer insight into a lingering question: How has ISIS managed to attract so many men and women to its self-styled caliphate and keep them there? They show how a person’s mind can be pulled into extremism and how it can be won back. They also show the dangers ISIS members face in leaving — and the struggle that follows to move on with their lives.

Okab had been a university student in Raqqa, smoking cigarettes and chasing girls with his classmates, who was radicalized gradually through the civil war — until ISIS’s hardline vision began to seem like a pillar of order amid the chaos.

By the time ISIS took control of Raqqa, in the summer of 2013, he was a rebel fighter who had lived through two years of extreme violence, watching as the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad massacred civilians first by firing on peaceful protests and then by crushing opposition-held neighborhoods with airstrikes. The bloodshed had subsumed his family, his cousins and siblings killed or kidnapped by an ethnic Kurdish militia called the People’s Protection Units, or YPG, a bitter enemy of ISIS that Okab, like many Syrians, considered an Assad ally. ISIS offered him the chance to fight them both as the cause that had first led him to take up arms was eclipsed by the desire for revenge.

He was also drawn to the brute simplicity of its draconian Islam — cutting off the heads of murderers and the hands of thieves, lashing lovers for premarital sex — at a time when it seemed there was little order or logic to be found.

The militants put him through their infamous indoctrination courses, which instilled an unexpected radicalism in his mind. He had been living as an infidel, far from God, he learned, and obeying ISIS would bring him close. He was soon marching eagerly toward a violent death. He fought in dozens of battles, gaining a reputation as a fearsome warrior as he rose through the ranks. “I cannot explain this feeling, but they teach us that God is waiting for you, and you must go to him. So go and don’t be afraid of death,” he said. “And we wanted to die. Because when we die, all the hard things in this life will end, and we will start again.”

This mindset was gone by the time he returned to Raqqa in the aftermath of the massacre in Sinjar. As he made plans to follow through on his decision to leave, though, he began to get cold feet. Syria was destroyed, his family had unraveled, and his time with ISIS had tarnished him in the eyes of many of the people he knew. If I leave, he wondered, what will I do?

He clung to darker urges too. As an ISIS commander he had status, a weapon and a car, a house and a salary. He was a respected fighter; if he left he would be just another refugee. And he still wanted revenge. He felt responsible for a female relative who had been kidnapped by the YPG in retaliation for his work with ISIS, recalled a friend living in Turkey who was in touch with Okab at the time. “She was kidnapped because of him, and he wanted to get her released before he defected,” the friend said.

Okab made a compromise he would later find hard to justify: Though he had seen the truth about ISIS, he would continue to fight Assad and the YPG under its black flag.

Other defectors experienced similar confusion. None described a clean break from ISIS, recalling instead a winding mental journey with echoes of the same uncertainty that had driven them to the group in the first place.

ISIS’s surge to power had given it unique appeal at a time when rival rebel groups struggled to give their fighters weapons and salaries. The militant group boasts around 25,000 fighters, according to U.S. government estimates, and has attracted more than 38,000 foreign recruits in total over the years. After it seized Mosul, in June 2014, and declared its caliphate, it controlled a stretch of territory the size of Belgium with revenue streams from oil sales, extortion, taxes, and ransom from kidnappings. A 27-year-old fighter from the Syrian province of Deir Ezzor, an ISIS stronghold, said he had little love for the group when he joined but saw few choices as a fighting-aged male living in its territory. “I knew that they are criminals,” he said. “But it’s very hard to live your life in Syria, especially in ISIS areas, if you don’t join them.”

The militants gave him a house, a car, and a monthly salary and even paid for his wedding.

He too fell under the trance of extremism and, like Okab, found himself amid a massacre. He took part in the killing, he said, and declined to reveal more. The guilt, he said, eventually drove him to defect — but he feels stained by his crimes. He made plans to flee to Europe but canceled them after he worried other refugees would recognize him and alert the police. So he remains in limbo near the border in Turkey. “There are many people who want to defect,” he said. “But how can they survive?”

Another defector, 28, found that the best way to move on from ISIS was to keep fighting. He joined a rebel group that battles both ISIS and Assad, turning his gun on his old friends. “I thought ISIS would be able to fight the regime if they built their Islamic state, because the regime is a state, and only a state can fight a state,” he said. “But they are just like the regime. They told the Syrian people that if you are not with us, then you are our enemy. And they committed terrible crimes.”

Okab was still caught in his contradiction in Raqqa — knowing he should leave ISIS yet continuing to fight for it — when he received what he saw as a grim chance to make amends.

One of his superiors offered to give him a Yazidi slave.

He accepted, telling himself he could offer her safe haven, he said when he recalled the episode from southern Turkey: “Just I wanted to protect one Yazidi person at that time.”

The woman was so ill from the sexual brutality she had endured from previous owners that he rushed her to a hospital. ISIS’s use of rape against Yazidi women has been systematic, with at least 3,000 still trapped in bondage, according to the U.N., and stories of horrific suffering told by those who manage to escape. She was also in shock from what had happened to her family — her husband killed in front of her and her two young sons taken away for indoctrination in children’s camps. “I tried to help her feel better and take her mind off what happened,” Okab said. “But how can a woman who had this happen to her forget?”

By the time Okab escaped to Turkey to tell his story, the woman couldn’t be reached, making it impossible to say how she felt about her new captor or what happened to her in his custody. In Okab’s telling, he didn’t touch her during the months they lived together in Raqqa, and though he knew she could never fully trust him, he believed they became friends. Over hours of interviews, he repeatedly expressed horror at what ISIS had done to the Yazidis and in particular to its female slaves. “I was telling people they are human,” he said. “It’s haram” — forbidden — “to rape them and sell them and treat them like this. But their only answer was that they are infidels. They don’t understand human language.”

At the same time, the quest he described to protect the woman was part of a story he was telling himself — one in which, despite all the wrong he had done, he remained the hero. He recalled telling her about his own experience in Sinjar and thoughts about defecting. “I needed to find someone to talk to about this, because I felt I would blow myself up if I didn’t,” he said. “She was the only person.”

She was also a constant reminder of why he’d vowed to leave.

He began to set his sights on the border with Turkey, he said, hoping he could find a way to smuggle them both to safety. “We asked him to be careful and to forget the woman, because they might be killed together if ISIS caught them,” Okab’s friend in Turkey said. “But I think he wanted to help her to atone.”

Refugees have passed constantly across Turkey’s 565-mile border with Syria during five years of war, along with fighters, weapons, and aid. Some of the smuggling paths that cut through the desert hills have been used for decades. Although Turkish authorities have cracked down along the border, ISIS can still use veteran smugglers to get jihadis into their territory. To escape is far more difficult.




ISIS forbids even civilians from fleeing as airstrikes batter the towns and cities it controls. It keeps its own members in a tighter grip. They can’t leave ISIS areas without permission either, and fighters are often isolated in military camps. They are also watched closely by ISIS’s internal security and intelligence branch, the amni, which permeates its territory and has a network of informants beyond. Several defectors said they feared ISIS could kill them wherever they hid, even in Europe. “People can join ISIS, but nobody can defect,” said a Syrian man who worked for the amni before defecting last year.

The man said his tasks had included monitoring other ISIS members. Foreigners, he said, face an even harder time in leaving than locals like Okab. They might speak limited Arabic and often don’t know the terrain. Westerners in particular are spied on extensively. “I know that a lot of them are in ISIS jails because they want to leave,” the man said. “Spies came to me many times, saying this person or that person wants to defect.”

Reserved and imposing in a leather jacket and jeans, he sat in a hotel lobby in southern Turkey, smoking cigarettes and drinking tea. He said he found many of ISIS’s Western members to be especially naïve. They came to Syria with an idealized vision of ISIS that came crashing down when they were confronted with reality. He said he had received regular reports from informants about Westerners suspected of wanting to defect — about five every month.

He was supposed to pass the information to his superiors. But he began to keep it to himself, he said, as he too became disillusioned and made plans to escape, believing that ISIS was more concerned with killing civilians and rival rebels than with fighting Assad. He arrived in Turkey last fall and still counts his time away from ISIS by the day.

New dangers lurk for defectors who flee Iraq and Syria. Foreign governments are on high alert over the terror threat posed by ISIS fighters returning home, and operatives posing as refugees. Recent ISIS attacks in Paris, Istanbul, and Brussels involved jihadis who were dispatched by the group from Syria, and authorities in Europe have repeatedly foiled other plots. This puts defectors under intense suspicion and the threat of arrest, said two men working to help defectors navigate their escapes.

Both men are Syrians based in Sanliurfa, Turkey, which sits near the border with ISIS territory and hosts thousands of refugees. Neither has been a member of ISIS. They work independently of one another, but the process is similar for each. They normally hear from a trusted contact in Syria about an ISIS member who wants to defect. Then they contact the potential defector, through an intermediary or online, to determine whether he or she can be trusted. If so, they coordinate with veteran smugglers to sneak the person from ISIS territory and across the border to Turkey, where they must then try to avoid the authorities as well as ISIS spies.

Each man has helped both locals and foreigners. The cases are sporadic. Both said many more people would defect if they could find an easier way. “I think they’re too afraid,” said one, a former rebel commander in his forties. He had just spent two months working to smuggle a European defector to Turkey, who spoke briefly to BuzzFeed News by phone after he arrived, saying only that his journey was complete.

The second man, a decade younger, works with one of the rebel groups that is at war with ISIS; his task is to weaken the extremists by pulling people from their hold. He clicked through photos and videos of some Western defectors on his laptop and criticized foreign governments for doing little to bring their own jihadis home. “I just want these people out of my country,” he said.

Trying to leave ISIS can be as risky as anything would-be defectors faced on the battlefield. Shiraz Maher, a U.K.-based researcher who has tracked ISIS defectors, speaks regularly with the parents of ISIS members who say their sons or daughters want to escape. “I tell them this is the most dangerous thing he or she will do,” he said. “It’s actually safer for them to stay in Raqqa.”

Maher, a senior fellow at the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation at King’s College in London, sees defectors as a missed opportunity in the fight against ISIS. “There is no one more compelling in terms of a counter-narrative to ISIS than a defector,” he said. “Because they speak with the greatest authority. No one has lived it apart from these guys.”

Even as the U.S. and its allies work to roll back ISIS on the battlefield, Maher said, they have done little to encourage would-be defectors to leave or to clarify a policy on how they’ll be treated if they come home. “The policy is that if you go to Syria, you die in Syria, or you sort of live your life as a nomad,” he said. “No one has a plan and no one has a strategy. As a result of that, people remain inside.”

This leaves potential defectors with little to support them in the decision to leave and a lot pulling them to stay. “ISIS ultimately operates like a cult. It’s not just a simple process of intellectually disengaging,” Maher said. “You’re also invested on an emotional level — your friends are in the group and it gives you a real sense of purpose. You’re doing God’s work, and everything makes sense. Going from that to a world that lacks that coherence and meaning is a terrifying process.”

A 26-year-old Syrian living in Sanliurfa described his efforts to free his mind from ISIS as something like trying to wake from a bad dream. Time after time he worked to pull himself from its radical mindset only to be sucked back in.

When ISIS had first descended on his native Deir Ezzor, he fought them, as a member of a rival rebel group. Then, after ISIS won, he was captured and given an ultimatum: Fight with us or die. Soon he was on the front doing battle against his old allies.

When he wasn’t fighting, he attended indoctrination courses taught by foreign instructors. After years of war, he found himself drawn to the sectarian hatred they preached. ISIS promotes a fanatical version of Sunni Islam, the religion practiced by most Syrians and almost all of the opposition. The Assad regime is dominated by the Alawite sect, an offshoot of Shiite Islam.

Before the war, he would have considered it “shameful,” he said, to even ask a fellow Syrian his or her religious creed: “We were living together. We were friends.”

But he became convinced that all Shiites and Alawites were responsible for the suffering inflicted by the regime. Anyone standing in ISIS’s way, even rival rebels, was an infidel too. “Every day, I would wake up in the morning, go to pray, sit with ISIS members and start talking about how we will kill all Shiites and Alawites after we finish our fight with the [rebels],” he said.




During short breaks to visit home, his family would plead with him to leave ISIS and press him with evidence of its crimes. He would be swayed. Then he would return to his military camp and feel his mind swinging back the other way. “We only talk to each other; we don’t watch the media,” he said. “I was always changing my mind.”

He finally made his decision, he said, when an ISIS jihadi in Raqqa publicly executed his own mother, who was an Alawite. He fled shortly after, and by the time he sat down to talk in Sanliurfa, he had been living there for three months. But the hatred ISIS had instilled was hard to outrun. Sipping tea, he said he rejected ISIS, yet he still fixated on the idea of sectarian revenge. “Shiite and Alawite civilians, if they don’t convert to Sunni Islam, we must kill them,” he said. “Because after the war started, they were supporting the regime to kill us. So why can’t we take our revenge?”

He paused to reflect on his continuing struggle. “I’m 26, and I was always changing my mind,” he said. “But what if I tell you about kids inside ISIS? They only want to kill and die.”

A three-hour drive from Sanliurfa, near the Turkish city of Antakya, one such child was now living as a refugee with his family. They had rescued him from ISIS last summer — but the 13-year-old boy had spent the months since resisting their attempts to win back his mind. He had attended ISIS’s indoctrination courses in Raqqa and still considered himself a loyal member. He wanted to return and fight for them in Syria. “I’m not too young,” he said. “Everybody can go to jihad, young people and people more than 100 years old.”

He sat cross-legged on a living-room carpet, looking younger than his age, surrounded by relatives as a television in the corner relayed updates from the war. They kept up a gentle back-and-forth with the boy, challenging him on his violent beliefs, but to little avail. One day last summer, an uncle had brought him to a Turkish beach, hoping to win him over with the sight of young women clad in bikinis. The boy had taken one look and said he wanted their blood to turn the sand red. “He doesn’t listen to us,” the uncle said.

In the living room, when the subject turned to school, the boy said he was doing well and hoped to be an engineer one day. When the conversation turned back to ISIS, he said he hoped to slaughter anyone it would cast as an infidel, even among his neighbors and friends.

“Not all of them,” the uncle prodded him.

“No, all of them,” the boy replied.

“Say at least that you don’t want to kill them, but that maybe ISIS will kill them,” another uncle said.

“No,” the boy insisted, staring deliberately ahead. “I want to.”

On a cold night in southern Turkey, Okab sat around a patio table with an older brother, chain-smoking cigarettes beneath a heat lamp’s orange glare.

He wore a sweater and a soft expression that belied his reputation from the battlefield. As he recounted his escape from ISIS, he fought back tears.

In Raqqa, he had offered to smuggle the Yazidi woman to Iraq or bring her across the border with him to Turkey, he said. But she refused to leave without her two sons, both under 10; she’d heard nothing of them since they were separated when ISIS came. He began to ask about them at the children’s camps, he said, careful not to raise suspicions, but turned up nothing.

Then, still debating his next step, he received permission from ISIS to travel to Turkey to get treatment for an old battle wound. While recovering from surgery, he said, he had received a warning from Raqqa that ISIS had discovered his dissent and that he would be arrested if he returned. He stayed in Turkey, leaving the woman behind.

He had learned, he said, that he can’t right his wrongs — and is far from a hero. The female relative who had been kidnapped by the YPG was released without his help and now refused to speak to him. As for the Yazidi woman, his brother said: “They probably sold her again.”

Okab admitted that he had considered asking forgiveness from ISIS and returning to Raqqa to live as a civilian, unsure of what to do with himself in Turkey. He hoped instead, he said, to find a way “to live a normal life.”

He was wary of any allegiance or creed, and even less religious than in his university days. “Islam is rules and Muslims must be under those rules,” he said. “I don’t want to be under anyone. I want to be free.”

https://www.buzzfeed.com/mikegiglio/how-to-lose-your-mind-to-isis-and-then-fight-to-get-it-back

Apr 5, 2016

Imams sent to New Zealand from Egypt to 'combat radicals'

Eleanor Ainge Roy
The Guardian
April 5, 2016

 
 Muslims are the fastest growing religious group in New Zealand. Photograph: National Geographic Image Collec/Alamy
Egypt’s ambassador to New Zealand has caused upset among Muslim groups by saying imams are being sent from his country to “take control” of mosques.

Tarek al-Wasimy told the New Zealand Herald that three imams were waiting for visas to enter New Zealand to fight the radicalisation of Muslims in the country.

“We don’t want anything to happen here like what has happened in Belgium, Paris, Madrid or London so we are sending imams to explain Islam and to take control of Islamic centres and mosques here,” Wasimy said.
There are 50,000 Muslims in New Zealand and they are the fastest growing religious group in the country.

But Tahir Nawaz, president of the International Muslim Association of New Zealand, said imams had been sent from Al-Azhar University in Egypt for “more than a decade” and the recent influx was simply a response to New Zealand’s increasing Muslim population, which will be further bolstered by an intake of 600 Syrian refugees over the next two years.

“New Zealand has always been at very low risk of Muslim radicals,.
Kiwi Muslims are quite upfront and honest about calling out behaviour that is not moderate and appropriate,” he said.

“Imams help lead the religious community, they lead prayers and provide support and guidance. With New Zealand’s increasing Muslim population, their services are needed more now than ever.”

Hazim Arafeh, president of the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand, said hundreds of imams were sent around the world every year and their increasing numbers in New Zealand were not a reflection of a rise in radicalisation.
“New Zealand does not have a problem with radical Muslims at all. If there are any they are the absolute minority and not on the rise,” said Arafeh. “The offer was made to us for more imams to come to New Zealand this year and we accepted it. Our mosques are not being taken over in any way or controlled, that is very misleading and inaccurate.”

Alexander Gillespie, a professor of international law at Waikato University, said Al-Azhar had been sending imams abroad “for a thousand years” and the practice was akin to Christian missionaries travelling the world.

“I don’t see New Zealand Muslims as more or less radical than anyone else. Having more imams here can only be seen as a positive move though because the chance for face-to-face, open dialogue is the best defence against radicalisation,” he said.

The Guardian contacted the Egyptian embassy in New Zealand but was told the ambassador was not available for comment.

Egypt’s ambassador to New Zealand has caused upset among Muslim groups by saying imams are being sent from his country to “take control” of mosques.

Tarek al-Wasimy told the New Zealand Herald that three imams were waiting for visas to enter New Zealand to fight the radicalisation of Muslims in the country.

“We don’t want anything to happen here like what has happened in Belgium, Paris, Madrid or London so we are sending imams to explain Islam and to take control of Islamic centres and mosques here,” Wasimy said.
There are 50,000 Muslims in New Zealand and they are the fastest growing religious group in the country.

But Tahir Nawaz, president of the International Muslim Association of New Zealand, said imams had been sent from Al-Azhar University in Egypt for “more than a decade” and the recent influx was simply a response to New Zealand’s increasing Muslim population, which will be further bolstered by an intake of 600 Syrian refugees over the next two years.

“New Zealand has always been at very low risk of Muslim radicals,.
Kiwi Muslims are quite upfront and honest about calling out behaviour that is not moderate and appropriate,” he said.

“Imams help lead the religious community, they lead prayers and provide support and guidance. With New Zealand’s increasing Muslim population, their services are needed more now than ever.”

Hazim Arafeh, president of the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand, said hundreds of imams were sent around the world every year and their increasing numbers in New Zealand were not a reflection of a rise in radicalisation.
“New Zealand does not have a problem with radical Muslims at all. If there are any they are the absolute minority and not on the rise,” said Arafeh. “The offer was made to us for more imams to come to New Zealand this year and we accepted it. Our mosques are not being taken over in any way or controlled, that is very misleading and inaccurate.”

Alexander Gillespie, a professor of international law at Waikato University, said Al-Azhar had been sending imams abroad “for a thousand years” and the practice was akin to Christian missionaries travelling the world.

“I don’t see New Zealand Muslims as more or less radical than anyone else. Having more imams here can only be seen as a positive move though because the chance for face-to-face, open dialogue is the best defence against radicalisation,” he said.

The Guardian contacted the Egyptian embassy in New Zealand but was told the ambassador was not available for comment.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/05/imams-sent-new-zealand-egypt-combat-radicals-egypt

Feb 15, 2016

Saudi Arabia's 'creative' approach to de-radicalisation

BBC
February 15, 2016

Video

Saudi Arabia has been signalling its determination to help in the fight against the so-called Islamic State group (IS) in Syria, with the suggestion it would be willing to send in ground troops.

A significant number of IS fighters come from the kingdom, and the authorities there have adopted a novel approach to de-radicalising extremists, as Orla Guerin reports.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35575707

Jul 16, 2015

Opinion: Federal anti-radicalization efforts have taken too narrow an approach

HERSCHEL SEGAL
SPECIAL TO MONTREAL GAZETTE
July 16, 2015

Day after day, we read or hear about radicalized youth adopting extremist ideology. Events have abundantly proved that our country is not immune to the contagion. The attacks that killed two Canadian soldiers last year made plain our vulnerability.

Those terrorist acts also showed we’ve been relatively lucky, because neither of the attackers had prepared the means to inflict mass casualties. In that regard, they stood in contrast to the inept would-be bombers of a Via Rail bridge, and the fumbling young Muslim converts in Victoria who dreamed of exploding pressure-cookers on the grounds of the B.C. legislature. If either of those terrorist dreams had come true, Canada would have suffered its own 9/11.

Why, then, has the prevention of radicalization not commanded considerably more discussion at the highest level of our public discourse?

Montreal’s centre for the prevention of violent extremism, to open in September, represents an excellent local initiative and points the way for further action. Meanwhile, however, most of the anti-radicalization attention at the federal level, and virtually all the budgeted resources, are instead being spent on law enforcement.

Strengthening security agencies in the wake of terrorism has traditionally been the reaction of politicians. Such a policy can easily be understood, and no one can dispute its necessity. However, by treating only the endgame, law enforcement chases the horse long after the barn door has been torn off its hinges.

I have served for three decades on the board of InfoCult in Montreal. Since its inception, InfoCult has sought to understand the dynamics behind the radicalized mind. The organization’s strategy has been to understand the psychological trajectory of the “true believer,” and promote prevention through intervention.

Events are clearly proving that what we need in Canada are substantial resources that target the basis of the extremist appeal. The fight against radicalization requires, on the one hand, a major effort to identify why receptive people are succumbing to the extremist message and, on the other, a focus on working with the families of those people.

Family members are the ones most likely to notice risk situations. As recent events in Quebec prove, a significant part of prevention can come from tipoffs called in by parents and siblings. Not all families, however, are willing to alert the police. We should therefore make it easy for them to communicate with agencies that are not connected to law enforcement.

The Internet is a key battleground. Anti-radicalization programs in social media should be quadrupled in scope — and then quadrupled again. The first challenge is to systematically analyze the tactics being used by the various terrorist groups. The subsequent task is to guide the targeted audience into questioning the propaganda being sent their way. Engage the young in this manner, and at the same time provide trained people with whom they can interact.

At the national level in Canada, we seem to be reacting on the run. This is problematic, because we may be running faster than we should in terms of deciding the best ways to proceed.

In the coming election campaign and debates, we should hope that our federal leaders make known their respective stances. While we read of wannabe jihadists going overseas or being interdicted at airports, we can’t know the number of them lurking in our midst. Who can tell how many suggestible teenagers are today reading bomb-making manuals on the Internet, and listening to demented demagogues inciting them to mass murder?

It’s time for Stephen Harper, Justin Trudeau and Tom Mulcair to make known their plans to prevent the radicalization of young Canadians.

Herschel Segal is a Montreal businessman and long-standing board member of InfoCult, an organization that studies and combats radicalization.

http://montrealgazette.com/news/national/opinion-federal-anti-radicalization-efforts-have-taken-too-narrow-an-approach

Nov 10, 2014

French parents alone against Syria jihad recruiters

Reuters
Nicholas Vinocur
Pauline Mevel
March 21, 2014

TOULOUSE, France

When Dominique Bons' timid son stopped smoking overnight and started praying frequently at his home in the southern French city of Toulouse, she alerted the authorities.

They did nothing because Nicolas was not suspected of any crime. One day last year he disappeared. Then Bons was sent a text message saying the 30-year-old had been "martyred" on December 22 driving a truck bomb in the Syrian city of Homs.

He grew up in a middle class suburb to atheist parents but converted to Islam in 2009. Like his younger half-brother who died in Syria months earlier, he joined the al Qaeda splinter group, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).

They are among a growing number of people, an estimated 2,000 so far, who have left Europeans states to fight alongside Islamist rebels in Syria to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad. Europe's authorities are struggling to stem the flow.

Bons is angry that her efforts to alert the government to a potential problem were ignored and is also convinced that the strategy of France and other European countries of jailing those caught trying to get to Syria makes the situation worse.

"It's crazy," said Bons, a retired military secretary who has set up a support group for parents of children who have been radicalized. "In jail they will be reinforced in their desire to go back to Syria... It seems like they (the government) are doing whatever they can to ensure that this continues."

In March, three men aged 21 to 26 were arrested at an airport in eastern France for sentenced to between two and six years for conspiracy to commit terrorist acts.

The population of French prisons is estimated to be up to 70 percent Muslim. Moderate preachers employed by the state are lacking, so a void is filled by untrained imams who preach a Salafist or hardline form of Islam and hatred of the West.

Radical Islamist Mohamed Merah, who killed seven people in and around Toulouse in 2012, is thought to have sharpened some of his ideas during a stint in jail.

THERAPY OVER JAIL

For Europeans, travelling to Syria is a cheap flight to Turkey and a quick trip over the border, so the problem is one faced by many countries.

A 41-year-old Briton from south east England, Abdul Waheed Majid, is suspected of having driven a lorry into a prison in Aleppo and detonated a bomb, allowing prisoners to escape.

British police have already arrested 16 people on suspicion of terrorism offences this year related to Syria, some as young as 17, compared to 24 such arrests in all of 2013. Among those is Moazzam Begg who spent nearly three years in U.S. detention at Guantanamo Bay on suspicion of being an al-Qaeda member.

Germany has said it faces an increased threat of attack due to around a dozen German militants who have returned from the conflict in Syria with knowledge of weapons and bomb-making. Around 300 German citizens are thought to have joined the rebels.

Belgium said in January that some 200 Belgians who had fought in Syria were being monitored in case they returned to the country. Around 20 had already been killed fighting for Islamist groups.

Most Europeans fighting in Syria join the Nusra Front or ISIL, the two militant opposition groups that are closest to al Qaeda and considered most dangerous by the West.

French volunteers have formed a fighting brigade within the Nusra Front, radio station RFI reported, made up of more than one hundred soldiers with the main rallying point the fact they can communicate in French and not in Arabic.

Between 600 and 700 French nationals or residents are believed to have volunteered for fighting or were involved in recruitment for Syria.

As in France, many European governments take a tough line, sending suspects to jail or making it more difficult to come home. Britain has said it would consider stripping the citizenship of dual nationals who tried to return after fighting in Syria.

Bons wants to see softer touches involving therapy to stop them becoming radicalized but this is rare.

"The problem is that the government thinks all these kids are potential Merahs," Bons said. "What's needed is some way to treat them in advance, to do preventative work with the help of psychiatrists and experts in the problem."

France has said it will set up a hotline for families to alert local authorities if they detect signs their children are becoming radical.

RECRUITMENT

A French judge said last month when the first wave of volunteers returns home they step up recruitment and that is partly why the numbers are growing.

Bons does not know who persuaded her sons to go and fight but suspects it was through someone Nicolas met in Les Izards, the suburb where Merah spent much of his childhood, an overwhelmingly immigrant area unlike where they grew up.

Toulouse, as well as Nice, Strasbourg and Paris, are thought to be fertile recruiting grounds. Two teenagers from the city were placed under formal investigation for conspiracy to commit terrorism in late January for trying to get to Syria, and several others have been arrested.

Bons said her son, who had a high school level degree in sales but was struggling to find a job, was a "nice boy" who had been manipulated.

A month after Nicolas first disappeared, with another man, he called to say he had given someone a letter explaining his reasons for leaving but it was never sent.

She was still in contact with him by phone and Skype when he appeared clutching a Koran and Kalashnikov rifle in a Youtube video in July 2013, calling on President Francois Hollande to convert to Islam and urging others to join the fight.

After the video was published Bons instantly became the face of jihadism in France. He and his brother were on the front page of several newspapers. Dominique said her son looked like a different person in the video "like someone possessed", whereas before he had been timid.

UNSYMPATHETIC

Bons said despite alerting the authorities of her concerns, she has had very little help from the state.

After Nicolas left for Syria in early 2013, Bons wrote to Hollande asking for help to bring him home. The presidency told her it had transferred her request to the interior and justice ministries, but no action was taken.

She has a contact at the DCRI internal security service, but has never been formally debriefed by authorities.

"At this point, as a parent, you are totally on your own, you have no idea where to turn," she said.

French Interior Minister Manuel Valls said in January that the government planned to set up a hotline for families.

"Families must be on alert for certain behaviours," he told parliament in January. "We'll need to come up with ways involving local officials and mayors for these families to alert our services."

For Bons the worst part is that it is proving difficult to bring the body back for burial in France. She says the French authorities have been unsympathetic and the situation is complex because France has broken off diplomatic relations with Syria.

A few other parents have reached out but most are ashamed. In the absence of support from the authorities, Bons and others parents have set up support groups. Hers is called "Syrien ne bouge, agissons" a play on the word "Syrian" in French which translates to "If nothing is changing, let's act".

In Belgium the "Concerned Parents Collective" aims to stop teens leaving the country. In the eastern French town of Strasbourg a loose-knit group of moderate Muslim associations protested in January under the banner "Hands off our children".

As part of its counter-terrorism strategy, Britain runs a programme called "Channel", which is designed to provide support to "individuals vulnerable to recruitment by violent extremists", involving police, schools, social workers and other figures from local communities.

Other non-governmental community organisations, such as London-based Active Change Foundation, also run projects to deal with violent extremism and terrorist recruitment.

Bons said she had been contacted by other parents of young jihadis, including a mother in Nice and the group in Belgium. They agree that European governments needed to find better ways to fight radicalism of their children.

"The mothers are on the front line," Bons said. "There are fathers, too, of course. But mothers will stop at nothing."

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/03/21/uk-france-syria-idUKBREA2K0AS20140321

'These are children, not terrorists,' say Belgian parents of Syria jihadists

January 31, 2014
France24

This week, two French teenagers were arrested trying to reach Syria to join fighting against President Bashar al-Assad. Three men from Paris went on trial on Thursday on similar charges. Now Belgian parents tell France 24 about losing their children to jihad.

It is a situation not unique to France. Young people from all across Europe have travelled to Syria to join the ‘Holy War’ against Assad, often leaving without warning, their parents unaware to their sons’ and daughters’ plans to become soldiers in a foreign land.

In Belgium, an estimated 300 citizens have left their country for the Syrian battlegrounds. Many parents believe their children, young and impressionable, have been manipulated into taking up the jihadist cause.

Gathered in front of the European Parliament in Brussels, a group of mothers with children in Syria have staged a protest to press the authorities into tackling the problem.

They are making a stand against what they claim is a lack of action by the authorities.

“We’re the parents of jihad fighters, of terrorists. People are afraid of them, of us. But we’re not the ones who’ve sent our children over there,” says Veronique, one of several protesters wearing masks they say symbolise “misunderstanding”.

“Our children were tricked into this,” says another. “They didn’t go to Syria of their own free will. I mean: it’s not normal, that a kid who had no problems finds himself over there, that’s not normal. These are children, Belgian children… They’re not terrorists!”

‘Our children have been manipulated’

Veronique has set up a group called the Concerned Parents’ Collective, where parents whose children have taken up arms in Syria meet regularly to provide mutual support to one another.

Samira, one of the group’s members, says her 19-year-old daughter Nora left Belgium eight months ago to join her husband in Syria.

“We woke up one morning and her bed was empty,” Samira tells FRANCE 24. “It was on a Sunday. She’d often say: ‘I’m of no use here, I want to help! I want to help!’”

Samira describes her daughter as hard-working, cheerful and a devout Muslim. She believes Nora travelled to Syria mainly out of love for her husband. He was killed just 15 days after she arrived.

Samira recently received a letter from Nora, via the Belgian police.

“Even if I’m going to a country at war, I will be a good person, Mum,” the letter reads. “You wanted me to be happy and I’ve found happiness. And even if I’m no longer around I hope you’ll say that you’re proud of your little daughter. I love you Mum, but I love Allah above anything else.”

Another woman, who wishes to remain anonymous, shares Samira’s anguish. Her 23-year-old son has been fighting in Syria since May 2013.

“He had just finished recording a music album. We didn’t think he was about to leave us. He’s not the kind of boy who’d say his prayers on a regular basis,” she says.

“Our children have been manipulated from the outside. Groups would show them all sorts of pictures. My son would go with friends to play video games – that’s where they recruited him.”

‘The community let them slip’

Last year, Belgian authorities dismantled several jihadist recruitment cells. They would approach youth via Internet forums but also in mosques.

Mimoun Aquichouh, president of the local mosque in Vilvorde, north of Brussels, says his place of worship has nothing to do with the enrolment of jihad fighters, but believes that everyone must take their share of responsibility for the recruitment of young Belgians by radical groups.

“I recognise the fact these young people were left behind, that the community let them slip,” says Mimoun.

“Whether here at the mosque, whether in the youth clubs, the city, the national authorities - we failed to supervise them. We should all do our part and start finding solutions for the youth.”

Some parents have gone to extraordinary lengths to bring their children back home safely.

Dimitri Bontik, a former soldier, travelled to Syria three times to find his 18-year-old son Yayoun. He spent 36 days in Aleppo interviewing fighters from different rebel groups. One thought he was a spy working for Assad.

“They hit me and they pressed the [barrel] of an AK-47 to my head. I thought I was going to die and I told them, 'I’m just a father looking for his son. I’m not a spy, just a father looking for his son.'”

‘What’s the point of returning home?’

Yayoun returned home after eight months in Syria with the help of a French NGO and after he had found out about his father’s efforts to track him down.

He spent 37 days in jail upon his return. He now lives with his family as he awaits trial, accused of taking part in the activities of a terrorist group. He is banned from going outside after 7pm, cannot attend a mosque or speak to the media.

Dimitri believes such treatment by authorities is discouraging more young people from returning from Syria.

“This is why young Belgians in Syria start thinking: ‘Well, if that’s the way it is, let’s just stay in Syria and never come back. We can stay living in big houses with swimming pools as free men. What’s the point of returning home, being arrested, going to prison, being accused of this and that?’”

Alexis Deswaef, a lawyer representing the Concerned Parents’ Collective, agrees. The group is filing civil cases against the jihad recruitment cells. They also want to make it easier on a legal level for their children to return home.

“Rather than jail time it would be better to have a strict framework, a very tough supervision to make sure they engage into a de-radicalisation process,” says Deswaef.

“There should be a follow-up for these youths so that they don’t end up bringing back home the type of activities they engaged into when they were in Syria. That’s where the effort should be."

http://www.france24.com/en/focus/20140131-these-are-children-not-terrorists-parents-young-europeans-fighting-syria-speak-out/

Parents of extremists urged to come out of shadows and help fight radicalization

Montreal gazette
Douglas Quan
POSTMEDIA NEWS
October 23, 2014
Your child has turned into a violent extremist, now what?

Susan Bibeau, whose son Michael Zehaf-Bibeau terrorized the nation’s capital in an assault on Parliament Hill, said in a statement this week that she and her husband had “no explanation” for their son’s actions and “very little insight to offer.” She begged for privacy.

But a grassroots movement emerging in Canada and abroad is trying to encourage the seemingly hapless parents of radicalized individuals to not retreat into the shadows but to be part of the solution.

Calgary’s Christianne Boudreau, whose son Damian Clairmont was killed fighting alongside Islamic State fighters in Syria, is hoping to launch an international support group for parents whose children have either died on the battlefield or whose children are heading down the path of radicalization. Similar groups have formed across Europe.

“Who can understand what you’re still struggling through than someone else who has lived it?” Boudreau said. There’s great comfort in being able to “express yourself and know that other person won’t judge you.”

The picture that emerged this week of Zehaf-Bibeau, the gunman who fatally wounded a soldier at the National War Memorial before being killed in a gunfight in Parliament’s Centre Block, was that of a troubled man with a history of violence, drugs and mental instability. Police said the 32-year-old Muslim convert may have held “extremist beliefs” and was looking to acquire a passport to go to Syria.

Susan Bibeau said that her son was “lost and did not fit in” and that she had been estranged from him for more than five years. “I have very little insight to offer,” she told The Associated Press. “We don’t wish to be part of any media circus, we don’t think it will add anything to the conversation.”

Boudreau said she understands the desire to want to just slink away. “There’s the guilt, the hurt, the pain, the disappointment and the barrage of questions you’re left with unanswered. It’s going to take her time to process that,” she said.

Boudreau, who learned in January that her 22-year-old son had died in rebel fighting in Syria, said she had to endure the pain of not only losing her son but also the frustration of not getting answers from Canadian intelligence officials about her son’s case. There were also taunts online and accusations that she should bear some of the blame.

It was a “lonely, dark, troubling, emotional” road, she said.
Earlier this year, the part-time accountant launched a Facebook page, Support for Families Touched by Violent Extremism, with the aim of connecting with “other families that have experienced the same pain.”

Now, she is hoping to launch an international support network for mothers of radicalized children. Her partner in the venture is Dominique Bons, a mother in Toulouse, France, whose 30-year-old son Nicolas similarly died while fighting with Islamic State militants in Syria.

Feeling frustrated that she had nowhere to turn for help, Bons formed a support group for parents of radicalized children called “Syrien ne bouge, agissons,” which translates into, “If nothing is changing, let’s act” and is a play on words on the French for Syrian.  After reading a Reuters news story about Bons, Boudreau, who had had no luck reaching any Canadian parents, knew she had to connect with her.

“I have a huge bond with her. She’s an amazing woman. She is so strong and so empowering,” Boudreau said.

They are hoping to go public with a website in November. Similar networks have formed in other parts of Europe. Austrian-based Sisters Against Violent Extremism trains mothers to detect and prevent radicalization in their children. In Belgium, parents whose children have taken up arms in Syria have formed the Concerned Parents Collective.

A mother in that group, whose 23-year-old son left for Syria in 2013, told the Paris-based news channel France 24 earlier this year that her son had just finished a music album. “We didn’t think he was about to leave us. … Our children have been manipulated from the outside.”

In the meantime, Boudreau has also been busy getting ready for the launch of the Canadian chapter of an overseas de-radicalization program called Hayat. Hayat, which means “life” in Arabic, is an offshoot of the Berlin-based EXIT program, which provides help to Germans trying to leave the neo-Nazi movement.

According to its promotional materials, the program partners with non-governmental groups, psychologists and experts in Islamic extremism to counsel families who are concerned about someone who has become radicalized.

Muhammad Robert Heft, a Toronto-based de-radicalization counsellor and RCMP community outreach liaison, said he thinks grassroots initiatives like the ones being developed by Boudreau deserve more government support.

There are a lot of Canadian parents who are “sitting in limbo,” probably feeling a mix of guilt and shame, and completely confounded by their child’s sudden radicalization but uncertain who to turn to for help, he said. If police get involved, that can sometimes cause the child to feel cornered and just inflame their anger.

Sometimes a community person is a better choice for intervention, he said, to help channel their anger in a more constructive way.

“You have to bring them back down to earth. They’re in the clouds.”