Showing posts with label Ave Maria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ave Maria. Show all posts

Jan 30, 2017

From book to boom: how the Mormons plan a city for 500,000 in Florida

Mormon church
The Mormon church owns vast tracts of US land, and now envisages a huge new city on its Deseret Ranch – but at what cost?

The Guardian
Claire Provost in St Cloud, Florida
Monday 30 January 2017

Everything about the Deseret cattle and citrus ranch, in central Florida, is massive. The property itself occupies 290,000 acres of land – more than nine times the size of San Francisco and almost 20 times the size of Manhattan. It is one of the largest ranches in the country, held by the one of the biggest landowners in the state: the Mormon church.

On an overcast weekday afternoon, Mormon missionaries give tours of the vast estate. Fields, orange trees and grazing animals stretch as far as the eye can see. While central Florida may be best known for Disney World, the ranch – roughly an hour’s drive away – is nearly 10 times bigger. It is home to a jaw-dropping 40,000 cows and has grown oranges for millions of glasses of juice.

Now there are ambitious, far-reaching plans to transform much of this land into an entirely new “city”, home to as many as 500,000 people by 2080. Deseret has said that while nothing will be built here for decades, its plans are necessary because urban growth in the area is inevitable and the alternative is “piecemeal development”. A slide from a 2014 presentation explains: “We think in terms of generations.”

Deseret’s plans, which were given the green light by local county commissioners in 2015, are thought to be the largest-ever proposed in the state and have attracted high-profile attention. Critics have accused the plans of putting already stressed natural habitats and critical resources, such as water, in further jeopardy.

“This is not a typical housing development. It is an entire region of the state of Florida – and it is the last remaining wilderness,” said Karina Veaudry, a landscape architect in Orlando and member of the Florida Native Plant Society. It is, she stressed, a plan on an unprecedented scale: “This project impacts the entire state, ecologically.”

For years, environmental groups protested that it was too risky to build so much on such ecologically important land – particularly in one of the few areas of Florida that hasn’t already been consumed by sprawling developments. “We fought it and fought it and fought it,” said Veaudry, who described it as nothing less than a “David and Goliath” struggle.

Except this time, Goliath was part of the property empire of the Mormon church.

Faith and property


The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has long influenced urban developments in America through specific ideas about town planning. In the 1830s, the church’s founder, Joseph Smith, laid out a vision for compact, self-sufficient agrarian cities. These were utopian in conception and have been hailed as a “precursor to smart growth” planning.

The plans for the Deseret ranch in central Florida have shone a spotlight on another side of the church’s influence: its investments in land and real estate. Today, the church owns land and property across the US through a network of subsidiaries. Its holdings include farmland, residential and commercial developments, though it remains notoriously tight-lipped about its business ventures.

The church has been buying up land in central Florida since the 1950s, starting with 50,000 acres for Deseret Ranch – since expanded almost sixfold. Its most recent major acquisition, by the church-owned company AgReserves, was another 380,000 acres in the state’s north-western panhandle – the strip of land that runs along the Gulf of Mexico. Deseret Ranch’s website quotes the late church president, Gordon B Hinckley, as saying that farms are both a “safe investment where the assets of the church may be preserved and enhanced” and an “agricultural resource to feed people should there come a time of need”.

Across America, subsidiaries of the church reportedly hold 1m acres of agricultural land. This is thought to include land in Nebraska, Oklahoma, Utah and Texas. Church companies are also thought to hold land outside the US, including in Canada and Brazil. In 2014, when church-owned farms in Australiawere put up for sale, reports estimated their worth at about $120m (£72.8m).

Recent real estate investments by church companies include the 2016 purchase of a 380-unit apartment complex in Texas, estimated to be worth tens of millions of dollars, and, in Philadelphia, a shopping area, a 32-storey apartment block and a landscaped plaza being built across the street from a newly constructed Mormon temple.

In Salt Lake City, where the church has its headquarters, a church company is currently working on a new master-planned community on the city’s west side for almost 4,000 homes. Last year, another investment was unveiled: the new high-end 111 Main skyscraper. Goldman Sachs is reportedly signed up as a tenant.

This city was built by Mormons. In the 19th century, early Mormon settlers gave Salt Lake City bridges, miles of roads, rail and other infrastructure. Hundreds of businesses were also set up: banks, a network of general stores, mining companies. The city’s Temple Squareis filled with statues glorifying the pioneers.

Nearby is a more contemporary monument to the investing and enterprising church: the City Creek Center, a new shopping mall with 100 stores and a retractable glass roof. It cost an estimated $1.5bn. At its grand opening, a church leader cut a pink ribbon and cheered: “One, two, three – let’s go shopping!”

The church said its investment in the mall would help revitalise central Salt Lake City as part of a wider multibillion-dollar initiative called Downtown Rising. Bishop H David Burton said it would create the necessary jobs and added that “any parcel of property the church owns that is not used directly for ecclesiastical worship is fully taxed at its market value”.

The City Creek Center project has been controversial, however – even among Mormons. Some current and former church members have questioned why money invested in such projects isn’t spent on charitable initiatives instead.

In 2013, Jason Mathis, executive director of Salt Lake City’s Downtown Alliancebusiness development group, said the church was “an interesting landlord”. “They’re not worried about the next quarter,” he explained. “They have a much longer perspective … they want to know what the city will look like in the next 50 or 100 years.”

Black box finances


Projects such as the Salt Lake City shopping centre have certainly focused attention on the church’s investments, but it remains secretive about its revenues and finances.

An entity called Deseret Management Corporation is understood to control many of the church’s enterprises, through subsidiaries focused on different commercial interests – including insurance and publishing.

Several church ventures bear the name “Deseret” – itself a term from the Book of Mormon meaning “honeybee” and intended to represent goals of productivity and self-sufficiency.

In central Florida, the church’s Deseret Ranch is understood to sell cows to Cargill, a Minnesota-based trading company, and oranges to Tropicana, as well as renting land to hunters and other companies.

Deseret, however, declined to confirm this. It said: “As a private investment affiliate of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Deseret Ranch does not release financial information or details about our production and customers.”

The church’s press office in Salt Lake City also did not respond to emails from the Guardian.

Previously, church officials have emphasised that finance for its companies’ investments do not come from tithing donations (church members are supposed to contribute 10% of their income each year) but from profits from other such ventures.

But these and other claims, even when offered, are also difficult to verify. Ultimately “their finances are a black box” according to Ryan Cragun, associate professor of sociology at the University of Tampa.

Cragun previously worked with Reuters to estimate in 2012 that the church owns temples and other buildings worth $35bn and receives as much as $7bn in members’ tithing each year. But he says the church stopped releasing annual financial information to its own members many years ago.

“Estimating their total land holdings? Good luck,” says Cragun. “Nobody knows how much money the church actually has – and why they’re buying all of this land and developing land.”

A new ‘city’ for Florida


Over the last half-century, Florida has become something of a laboratory for ambitious – and sometimes surreal – master-planned communities. In southern Florida, for example, the founder of Domino’s Pizza funded the construction of a “Catholic town” called Ave Maria. Closer to Orlando is the town of Celebration, developed by the Walt Disney Company, where shops on meticulously maintained streets sell French pastries and luxury dog treats.

Across Florida, more new subdivisions and developments are planned. Many of these projects have drawn criticism for their potential impact on Florida’s already stressed water resources.

“Sprawl is where the money is, and people want homes with big lawns and nearby golf courses,” a columnist for the Florida Times-Union newspaper recently lamented. He suggested the state should step in to ban water-hungry grass varieties and introduce stronger planning procedures to limit large-scale developments.

The ranch’s plans are the largest of these yet. Indeed, they are thought to be the largest-ever proposed in the state, and this land lies in an area that’s been called Florida’s “last frontier”.

In 2015, local Osceola county officials approved the North Ranch sector plan, which covers a 133,000-acre slice of Deseret property. As part of this plan, tens of thousands of these acres have been earmarked for conservation lands, not to be built on; and, in addition, Deseret has insisted that it will also continue ranching operations here for generations in the future.

But most of this land, under the approved plan, could be transformed into a new urban landscape. By 2080, it could be home to as many as 500,000 people. The plan explicitly refers to a new “fully functioning city”.

It envisages a massive development “complete with a high-intensity, mixed-use urban centre and a variety of centres and neighbourhoods”. There would be 16 communities and a regional hub with “a footprint of around one square mile – equal to [that] of downtown Orlando”.

New office blocks, civic buildings, high-rise hotels and apartment buildings are among the structures anticipated, along with new schools, a hospital, parks and a university and research campus. New motorways and rail lines would connect it all to Orlando and cities along Florida’s eastern coast.

The document argues that the plan is necessary to prepare for expected population growth. “More than 80% of the vacant developable land in the very area where demographic and economic forces are propelling an increasing share of the region’s population and job growth is located on Deseret’s North Ranch,” it says.

In an email to the Guardian, Dale Bills, a spokesperson for Deseret Ranch, said it offers a framework for future land use decisions but “will not be implemented for decades”.

“We’re not developers, but the sector plan allows us to be involved in shaping what the ranch will look like over the next 50-60 years,” Bills said. When growth does come to the region the plan will help “create vibrant communities that are environmentally responsible and people-friendly”, he said.

The plan also provides for continued farming operations, Bills added, meaning that “generations from now, Deseret will still be doing what we love – growing food and caring for the land”.

Meanwhile, the ranch has set aside another, smaller block of its land for a separate and more immediate project called Sunbridge, to be developed by the Tavistock Group – known in the area for its Lake Nona complex of master-planned communities just south-east of Orlando’s international airport.

On a weekday afternoon, the still largely empty Lake Nona development is silent. Signs planted by the road proclaim it is “where the grass is greener”. At the visitors’ centre, a pair of well-dressed women chat over coffee. A sales agent hands out glossy brochures with aspirational verbs embossed on its cover: DISCOVER. EVOLVE. INNOVATE.

Still under construction, Lake Nona describes itself as a “city of the future” with super-fast internet connections, “one of the top private [golf] clubs in the world” and homes ranging from luxury apartments to sprawling estates. Less than an hour’s drive from the ranch, it offers a potential hint of what’s to come.

‘The damage is done’


“Until this happened [the ranch] was a quiet neighbour,” said Jenny Welch, 54, a registered nurse and environmental activist who lived in the area for decades before leaving earlier this year. “When I first moved here in 1980, I thought it was great because it would never be developed. This is such environmentally important land. It’s a wildlife corridor. There are wetlands.”

Major concerns about the Deseret North Ranch plan have included how much water it will consume, the impact of proposed new roads and the amount of land set aside for conservation.

Veaudry, the Orlando landscape architect, said environmental groups tried to engage with the Deseret plans from the beginning by raising concerns but also suggesting enhanced measures to protect local ecosystems.

But, she said, what was ultimately approved was “pretty much the nail in the coffin” for decades-long efforts to establish a north-south ecological corridor to allow wildlife and ecosystems to flow across the state. It would put “literally a city right in the middle of it”, she said.

The new city envisaged for this land won’t be constructed overnight. While the overall plan for the area has been approved, more approvals will be needed on specific details. This has not reassured critics.

Florida environmentalist Charles Pattison has argued that the long time frame only makes it harder to monitor the project. “People involved in this today will not be around to see [it] through to completion, as many new administrative and elected officials will come and go over that time,” he said.

“The main guidelines, the amount of conservation, how wide the buffers have to be, all of that is already approved and set,” said Veaudry. “As far as I understand it, the damage is done. Locals know what happened. The Mormon church is the largest landowner here. And they have enormous resources.”

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jan/30/from-book-to-boom-how-the-mormons-plan-a-city-for-500000-in-florida

Jul 23, 2007

Ave Maria Not Just for Catholics

Brian Skoloff
W
ashington Post
July 23, 2007 

NAPLES, Fla. (AP) -- No, of course not, Ave Maria is not a Roman Catholic town, its builders say. Why would you think such a thing?

Yes, the streets have names like Annunciation Circle and John Paul II Boulevard. The town is laid out to catch the sunrise at a certain angle each March 25, the day Catholics celebrate the Feast of Annunciation. And the Catholic university whose towering 10-story church dominates the landscape bans the sale of condoms and warns that premarital sex can be grounds for expulsion.

But Ave Maria is open to everyone, said Blake Gable, project manager for the Barron Collier Cos., which is building the new town in partnership with Domino's Pizza founder Thomas Monaghan, an ardent Catholic.

"When I lived in Washington, D.C., I looked out my window and I saw the National Cathedral. I didn't feel like I was in a religious environment," Gable said. "It's never occurred to me that it's a Catholic community."

The builders of Ave Maria, whose name is Latin for Hail Mary, have been struggling to get the message out that anyone can live here ever since Monaghan's headline-grabbing comments in 2005, when the site was still just a sod farm. Monaghan told a Catholic group at the time that the town would be governed by Roman Catholic principles. He said stores wouldn't carry contraceptives or pornography, and cable TV would have no adult channels.

In response, a Wall Street Journal opinion column quoted a critic of Ave Maria as calling it a "Catholic Jonestown." The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida threatened to sue. Critics called it un-American. And Monaghan backed off.

Monaghan now says that Ave Maria University, the school he is also bankrolling, will follow strict Catholic guidelines, but the town will be largely allowed to grow uninhibited _ except for no adult novelty stores or topless clubs. The developers say they will merely suggest that merchants not sell contraceptives or porn, and cable TV offerings will not be restricted.

Even with that, Monaghan seems disappointed. If he had his way, Ave Maria would be God's town.

"I thought we owned the real estate, so we can lease to whoever we want and put things in the contract, but there are laws and there were lawsuits out there," Monaghan said.

The developers say that they will allow any denomination to build a house of worship in Ave Maria, and that gays are welcome, too.

In fact, the Web site for the town and university makes no mention of Catholicism at all, not even noting that the school will be Catholic.

"Ave Maria reinvents hometown living with a flourishing new community complementing a new university," the site says. "Ave Maria is an exciting place to live, work, play and learn for every family, every lifestyle and every dream."

Monaghan has spent more than $200 million building the school, which opens next month and hopes to attract 5,500 students. It is the first Catholic university built in the United States in four decades. Gable and Monaghan repeatedly note that the university and town are two separate entities.

But the school's 1,100-seat church will be the undisputed focal point of the community, with the town center wrapping around it like a pastel-colored Italian village with overhanging balconies, verandas and glass storefronts.

Ave Maria University President Nicholas Healy Jr. said the school would "encourage students to live a Catholic moral life."

"At a number of schools, there's a problem with binge drinking or recreational sex," Healy said. "We don't permit that. ... It would be a very serious violation. We teach what the Catholic church teaches, and the Catholic church teaches that contraception is a grave moral evil and we accept that."

Barron Collier has spent about $200 million constructing the town and aims to house more than 20,000 residents. Gable said sales have exceeded expectations, with about 250 homes sold since February, though just a few of those people have moved in.

As for whether Jews or others might be uncomfortable living in a town called Ave Maria, he said: "Do people who live in San Francisco feel offended? San Antonio?"

New York retirees Henry and Roseann Knetter moved into their home about a month ago. As Catholics, the religion aspect was a big draw.

"It just appeared to be a really nice concept with the church in town," said Roseann Knetter, 64.

But they said it wasn't just religion that attracted them.

"We wanted to be in a town that was going to grow up from its grass roots," Knetter said.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/23/AR2007072300884.html

Apr 15, 2007

3 resign at Ave Maria

Jennifer Brannock
Naples News
April 15, 2007

Ave Maria officials confirmed three members of the school's admissions department opted not to return to the school for fall semester.

Officials would not confirm the names of the three staff members, but posters on an Ave Maria watchdog site, www.avewatch.com, reported Assistant Director of Admissions Erin Flaherty, Admissions Counselor Rose DeCaro and team member John Gordon resigned.

John Sites, vice president of academic affairs at Ave Maria, said the resignations came as a surprise but he supports his staff, who will work through June.

"I respect the individual decisions they have made," Sites said. "If that's something they wish to do, I understand there were personal decisions attached to all three."

Sites would not comment on what reasons the resigning staff members gave for leaving.

"Out of respect for the people involved, I won't divulge that information," he said.

Sites confirmed Admissions Director Rich Dittus will be transferred to another department in the coming months. Sites would not say what role Dittus will assume, nor why he is being moved.

"In keeping with his goals, and with our vision, we felt the move was best," Sites said.

Sites confirmed Avewatch reports that Ave Maria is considering hiring an outside consulting firm to help recruit students.

The Rev. John Michael Beers, dean of the pre-theologate and associate professor of classics and early Christian literature, said about 320 undergraduate students attend Ave Maria. Beers said administrators hoped to have between 500 and 600 students this year.

Some Avewatch insiders reported the resignations may have been tied to the firing and immediate re-hiring/demotion of the Rev. Joseph Fessio last month. Bloggers on the Web site speculated Fessio may have been demoted, due to the low turnout and retention rate of students at the school.

Ave Maria officials will not grant interviews with the media regarding Fessio's dismissal and re-hiring. Officials refer media members to a previously released statement, calling the firing a result of "irreconcilable differences over administrative policies and practices."

Bloggers on Avewatch and another popular Web site critical of Ave Maria, www.fumare.blogspot.com, aren't buying it.

The most popular and often repeated theory surrounding Fessio's firing continues to be his statement made in the California Catholic Daily newspaper two days before his firing. Fessio called homosexuality a genetic disorder, and favored genetic tampering to remove the disorder, which is strongly opposed by many Catholics.

New speculations have cropped up among Ave Maria insiders, regarding Fessio's dismissal. Former Ave Maria College Dean of Students Chris Beiting said there was a constant power struggle between Fessio and President Nick Healy during their time at the college in Michigan.

Though he is no longer affiliated with the school, Beiting said several students have contacted him, complaining about the tension and mistrust circulating throughout the campus, and the atmosphere of fear and intimidation that exists.

"I think what started off as interesting and noble has become a cult," Beiting, a self-described devout Catholic, said. "There's a climate of fear there, and an inability to ask questions."

Kate Ernsting, former public relations director for Ave Maria College, said there were distinct differences between Fessio and Healy's visions for running the school.

"I think there has always been an understanding that the school was being run like a closed corporation, and you just can't do that," Ernsting, also a Catholic, said.

"My experience with Father Fessio is that his vision was more collegial, and he has an understanding that everyone had to be part of things."

A Catholic Web site, www.angelqueen.org, reported Fessio's firing may have been related to an incident with two students, referred to in the posting as "Casey and Frank."

Angelqueen reported: the two students attended a university-sponsored retreat in New Mexico last month, and were asked to participate in absurd rituals. When they complained, the students were sent back to Florida, and administrators attempted to expel them from school.

Fessio stood in the way of the expulsions, and was penalized with the firing, Angelqueen reported.

Fessio has said in previous interviews that he does not know why he was fired, but that cooperation with the media may have been a factor.

http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2007/apr/15/three_resign_ave_maria/