Showing posts with label Islamophobia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamophobia. Show all posts

Jun 14, 2017

The Birth of Canada's Armed, Anti-Islamic 'Patriot' Group

MACK LAMOUREUX
VICE
June 14 2017

They call themselves the Three Percent. They’re armed, say they’re ready for war on Canadian soil, and experts say they are dangerous.

In front of Calgary City Hall, a couple dozen of them stood shoulder-to-shoulder in an attempt to make an unbreakable human wall. Each of them wore a uniform consisting of a black T-shirt emblazoned with a Roman helmet—a look that wouldn't be out of place in a biker gang. It was a line filled with mostly men, and a few women, who you wouldn't want to go toe-to-toe with in a bar. All of them were white.

Some of the III% (the "three percent," as they call themselves) brought shock canes—a non-lethal weapon that can deliver up to a million volts to the person hit—while others had billy clubs or regular old canes. On many of the shirts was the III%'s credo, "NSA"—Never Standing Alone. Scattered throughout the rest of the square were small groups overseeing the proceedings from an elevated position, as well as III%er members dressed in plain clothes milling about the crowd gathering "intel" on what they considered to be the day's enemy—Antifa, the anti-fascist group.

In front of the line their leader, Beau Welling, the president of the Alberta chapter and national vice-president of the III%, stood calling commands quietly into a mobile phone he held like a walkie talkie.

A few hours earlier, the group had swept the perimeter checking the potted plants that surround the municipal building for any improvised explosive device. They were concerned that ISIS might target the event or that Antifa may have planted weapons beforehand.

The group of III%ers was attending the rally as "security detail" for a controversial anti-Islam speaker named Sandra Solomon, who was involved in a dust up with anti-fascists in Winnipeg a few days prior. Welling had made it clear to the group beforehand that attendance was mandatory, citing the Winnipeg incident and partisan violence south of the border.

This was effectively the III% Alberta's coming out party—a planned operation that they called "Operation Shock N Awe"—and a show of force by a far-right anti-Islamic organization that claims to be heavily armed and ready for "war" on Canadian soil.

An eight-month VICE Canada investigation into the inner workings of the group has found it to be a tight-knit openly anti-Islamic group that is unique in Canada's far-right ecosystem—one that, as one expert puts it, seems to be a "wholesale lift of an American militia." During VICE Canada's investigation, the group's rhetoric and tactics rapidly escalated from virulently anti-Islam online posturing to IRL monitoring of mosques, live fire paramilitary-style training, claiming to buy land, and plans for creating smoke and flash bombs.

Welling, a key figure in the group, told VICE that he suspects that the Canadian government considers them "domestic terrorists."

"If the time would come and we would need to use force and take action, you know, we will do that."

"What we like to consider ourselves is Canada's last line of defence from all enemies, both foreign and domestic," Welling told VICE. "If the time would come and we would need to use force and take action, you know, we will do that."

Insular groups like the III% are hard to nail down when it comes to sorting toxic online rhetoric from what has the potential to lead to real world actions. But experts told us it's important not to underestimate the risks associated with a group playing with the potentially lethal cocktail of xenophobia and firepower.

When Dr. Barbara Perry, a leading researcher on far-right groups and hate crimes in Canada at the University of Ontario, was briefed on their activities she responded with a simple, "I'm scared of this."


A Quick Build

The III% (or "threepers" as they're also known) take their name from an American paramilitary group that organized after Barack Obama was elected president in 2008. They are a largely decentralized organization built around strong anti-government and pro-gun views. Numerous people linked to the III% in the US have been charged with crimes, including Allen "Lance" Scarsella, who shot five people at a Black Lives Matter protest, and a member was arrested in 2011 in a foiled plot to bomb federal buildings in Atlanta.

The Canadian origins of the III% began in late 2015, shortly after Justin Trudeau became prime minister. It started with a nationwide Facebook group called III% Canada, which quickly turned to setting up chapters across the country. It was during this time that I added my personal Facebook profile—which clearly states I'm a journalist—to the secret group, a move that was approved by Welling.

Over time, the group has been able to make that rare jump from angry online Facebook group to real-world activity. For almost a year now, the III% chapter in Alberta—which has the most active members in Canada—has been slowly forming itself into a militia-like organization. The chapter in wildrose country boasts about 150 to 200 active members and over 1,600 members online.

The people who populate the group are a rough coalition of ex-military members, preppers, conspiracy theorists, and people who are simply scared of what is "happening" to the country. They claim to be heavily armed, with many members posting photos of their numerous guns to their page. Welling said that majority of the group is blue collar shift workers or nine-to-fivers who have been hit hard by Alberta's economic downturn and claimed the III%ers have loaned out thousands of dollars to their fellow members.

Other parts of the country have chapters as well, but they are much smaller than the Albertan one and seem to exist primarily online. However, during an anti-Islam rally in Toronto, on May 6, three III%ers made an appearance and got into it with Kevin Metcalf, a journalist for Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, which resulted in one man being charged with assault and another being wanted for arrest.

When first contacted by VICE about this story several months ago, the RCMP claimed to have no knowledge of the III%ers, but when we followed up recently they gave us a statement.

"The RCMP is aware of this group," reads a statement from RCMP. "The RCMP does not investigate movements or ideologies, but will investigate the criminal activity of any individuals who threaten the safety and security of Canadians."
Openly Anti-Islam

The Canadian III% is, in essence, a direct lift of an American militia that has been outfitted with a rough paint job to fit into a Canadian worldview—even the name III% comes from an American myth that it was three percent of the American population that fought against the British in the War of Independence. The group is hierarchical, similar to motorcycle clubs or the Soldiers of Odin, and to become a member you have to be patched in by showing loyalty and worth to your superiors.

The Albertan group claims to meet on a weekly basis to train with live ammunition and prepare themselves for when the "shit hits the fan." The group's attention shifts constantly, but it seemingly revolves around hating on Antifa, the influx of refugees crossing Canada's borders and, most prominently, the possibility of a Islamic terrorist attack. Unlike the Soldiers of Odin, or other like-minded groups, the III%ers don't seem to feel the need to play coy with their hatred of Islam.

VICE briefed several experts on the group and the III% were described repeatedly as "alarming" and every expert agreed that the group is an anomaly among the right wing groups we typically see in Canada. Amira Elghawaby, a spokesperson with the National Council of Canadian Muslims, told VICE that these groups, and their changing nature, are concerning, especially paired with the increasing number of anti-Islamic crimes in Canada.

"This is an area that we certainly have been concerned for some time and believe that Canadians may not truly understand the full impact and threat that may be out there because of a disproportionate view and focus on violent extremism when it's rising, unfortunately, from a misreading of Islam," said Elghawaby.

Welling met with VICE Canada in a north-Calgary Denny's for an interview the day after Operation Shock N Awe. The bushy-bearded Welling—who is originally from Toronto but moved to Alberta where he started a family and runs a transport company—showed up in a camo hat and was surprisingly open about their activities and vehemently anti-Islam views.

Welling told VICE that "anti-Islam" would be a fair description of the group's beliefs. From talking to Welling and seeing frequent posts on their closed group, it is clear the III% legitimately think an Islamic invasion of Canada is on the horizon, and that is what they're training for—the term he used to describe refugees and immigration was "a planned, tactical citizen invasion."

"We dislike Islam and the Muslims," he later added for extra measure.

Anti-Islam sentiment is the beating heart of III% Alberta. This worldview unites the group online and is/has been assuredly the driving force of recruitment. In the closed group, posts have been made about wiping all the Muslims off the earth, and there is frequent use of dehumanizing terms like "goat fucker" to describe the religious group. Welling once posted that all Muslims are guilty by association and "fuck the moderate Muslims." Another post by a member, referring to a debunked story about Syrian youths in a Red Deer high school, indicated that they should round up Syrian children "like animals."

With each terror attack over the past two years—from the Brussels bombing, to the Nice attack, the Berlin truck attack, to Westminster—the group gets more extreme with both their rhetoric and their training. The anti-Islam rhetoric seemingly hit a high water mark recently following the suicide attack at a Manchester Ariana Grande concert, which killed 22 people, including children and teenagers. Following the bombing Welling declared war.

"We are at war folks, we have been at war, and we are in the middle of the fight of our lives," Welling posted in full caps in the closed group. "It's on mother fuckers. It's time to do patriot shit. You wanna fuck around, you've seen nothing yet. We will win this war."

The following day—according to a Google calendar used by the group that VICE gained access to—a portion of his group started "smoke and flash bomb production." The group had also purchased a number of "stun canes" that deliver over a million volts—canes VICE saw in person during their Calgary showing. VICE did not see any homemade flash bombs at the event. On May 27, Welling organized a meeting for his soldiers to discuss "battle strategy," war tactics and how to "start [their] front push back"—VICE was unable to confirm if this meeting occurred and, if it was held, what was said.

The extremist movement of the group has not been accepted by all members. At the end of March, an extremely active member, Alberta's former sergeant at arms, left the III% because of direction the group was headed in—the man confirmed to VICE that he did make these statements but offered no further comment.

"When I joined I did so believing in the brotherhood and camaraderie I witnessed, [thinking it] was a reflection on how the group would operate," he wrote in a Facebook post upon leaving. "I also believed, as is written in the pinned post, that this was not a militia or would become one in public. I no longer believe that is the case."

This extreme rhetoric and activity is one of the biggest dangers the III%ers pose, according to several experts I spoke with for this story. A lone wolf attack inspired by the III%ers aggressive narrative, but "who thinks the group is not moving fast enough" is a genuine threat, said Dr. Barbara Perry.

"There is always the potential for an individual or a small cell to take that logic to its extreme conclusion and rather than waiting for the battle, to take the battle to the mosques in this case and engaging in offensive rather than defensive violence," said Perry. "I think that there is a really strong probability that someone will go off the rails."
Staking Out Mosques

Connected to the anti-Islam sentiment is a sense of paranoia in the group, one that is reinforced by the sharing of debunked news stories and far-right wing commentary from sites like Rebel Media or Infowars. The members of the group, like their counterparts worldwide, are distrustful of mainstream news and often stray into extreme conspiratorial territory.

An example of this came when four hunters went missing in northern Alberta in late April. Though the incident has been explained as an accident, Welling implied that jihadis may have killed them and there must be "terrorist training camps" in northern Alberta. On May 21, Welling posted that he had conducted "undercover intel" of a north-east Calgary mosque where he believed (with no evidence) that jihadis were being trained—when staking out the mosque he claimed he saw crates being brought in at 4:30 AM that he asserts must have been full of guns and ammunitions. (He doesn't provide any evidence for his allegation.) In speaking to VICE about this, Welling claimed that the group, himself included, are "actively checking into" 16 mosques across Canada through the use of stakeouts.

"These mosques, from what we've gathered, from our intel, these mosques are fronts for training groups, for terrorist training groups," he said. "We will continue to watch these mosques and monitor these situations."

Welling, while referencing the Ottawa shooter and the Toronto 18, said that the group considers these mosques to be the greatest threat to Canada both in the existential and physical sense and made the alarming suggestion that the group is ready to take "direct action" if it decides the government isn't "protecting the lives of Canadians."

Perry suggests the group is capable of more.

"I suspect it's 60 percent posturing but you can't downplay the risk of something like that. It's so specific and so narrowly defined. I see [Calgary's event] as a first stage of ratcheting up from discourse to action," Dr. Perry told VICE. "I don't think they're going to go from zero to 60 but I think there will be an escalation of activity."

When asked if this "intel gathering" of mosques is likely posturing, Dr. Perry stated that this seems in line with the group's activities and that the stakeouts are probably occurring at some level. Perry said the next logical step in the group's escalation would be targeting these mosques with either protests or vandalism.

When told that the group is claiming to be staking out mosques, Elghawaby said she was shocked.

"This is extremely frightening and disturbing to hear that this is happening in Canada and certainly we would be looking towards law enforcement agencies to be monitoring any risks or threats to the safety and well being in our communities and broader communities," she told VICE.
Unique in Canada's Far-Right Ecosphere

The threepers boast to be heavily armed—one post asking the crew to show their "load outs" featured members of the group with a wide array of weapons ranging from handguns and shotguns to powerful hunting rifles and what appears to be assault rifles. The weapons are not purchased by the group itself, but are owned by members and brought into the fold when they join. Ryan Scrivens, a PhD candidate in the School of Criminology at Simon Fraser University who studies right wing extremism in Canada, explained that this is one of the many things that separates the III% away from their peers.

"I'll be honest with you, I'm surprised they're as armed as they are," Scrivens told VICE. "That's not traditional of the far-right groups in Canada at least, we don't really have that gun-toting survivalist kind of way of thinking in Canada."

The group is, by their own admission, conducting live fire paramilitary training—and the training is being led by members who claim to be former military men. Welling told VICE that the group trains weekly, practicing hand signals, platoon-style movements, assault-style live fire drills and vehicle assaults—this is something the group reiterates on their closed Facebook group. Welling said a former military medic is apparently on site for all these training exercises and conversations on their closed group indicate they train either at fellow members' rural residences or at a location off the Red Deer River near the Penhold area.

The legality of this style of training is questionable. Section 70 of the Criminal Code of Canada entitled "Unlawful Drilling" outlaws "assemblies, without lawful authority, of persons for the purpose of (i) of training or drilling themselves, (ii) of being trained or drilled to the use of arms, or (iii) of practising military exercises." A person can be sentenced to upwards of five years if being found guilty of unlawful drilling.

In fact, the legality of the group as a whole is iffy. Welling makes it clear that the group understands the precarious legal state that comes part and parcel with the term "militia" in Canada and, thusly, is hesitant to describe themselves as such. Operating a militia in general is not illegal in Canada, but several laws and firearm codes, much like section 70, outlaw acting as one. This is not lost on the III% who, in the pinned post of their rules on the closed Facebook group VICE gained access to, state "We are NOT a militia."

"We like to call ourselves loosely as a survivalist group, an outdoors group, [but] we do take the label of a militia group very, very often," Welling said. "There is no running away or hiding that fact, you can call us what you want, we'll take the name 'militia group,' there is nothing to feel shame or nothing like that."

The threat of a violent outburst from the III% is most likely low, according to both Dr. David C. Hofmann, who studies right-wing extremist groups at the University of New Brunswick, and Scrivens, who explained that these groups typically are planning for a future event as opposed to planning and carrying out raids or assaults—however, both did add that predicting the activity of groups such as these in the current age is difficult. Hofmann explained that, typically, the threat of violence hinges on how the group is approached by law enforcement agencies.

The III%ers and similar groups could not have happened without social media, particularly Facebook, which allows them to create a insular communities and organize in secret. Social media also allows for the easy transfer of American ideas, like the III%, to make their way north of the border, Hofmann says.
Organized and 'Ready to Bang'

Right wing extremism in Canada, and the United States, has been burgeoning as of late. In times of great political and economic strife reactionary groups are certain to emerge—extremist publications caring more for narrative over fact have also played their part. In Canada alone, we've seen the immense rise, and possible fall, of the Soldiers of Odin, which birthed splinter groups like Storm Alliance, and a rise in what can only be called anti-anti-Islamophobia with rallies Canada-wide put on by groups like the World Coalition Against Islam, Pegida Canada, and the Canadian Combat Coalition. In the United States, militias that started under Barack Obama are still operating on the border and we've seen armed groups like the Oath Keepers make their presence known outside of mosques.

The most recent hate crime statistics released in Canada, show that there has been a 60 percent increase in hate crimes perpetrated against Muslim people from 2014 to 2015. Nationally hate crimes in general rose by 5 percent but in Alberta they rose by 39 percent. The memory of the six men shot dead by Alexandre Bissonnette in a Quebec city mosque just months ago is still fresh in Canada. While it is still unknown what the exact motives of Bissonnette were, the man has been frequently painted by those who knew him as an online right wing troll.

A study published by Dr. Perry and Ryan Scrivens in 2015 found that in the last 30 years the amount of deaths caused by far-right groups significantly outnumbered lives taken by jihadis within Canada. They also found, at the time of their study, there were over 100 far-right groups in Canada with the majority of the groups existing in Alberta, Quebec, western Ontario, and British Columbia. Another 2015 study, this time conducted in America by the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security, found after interviewing 328 law enforcement agencies that 73.8 percent stated that far-right violence was the number one threat in their jurisdiction.

All this has been leading us to where we currently are: a "free speech" (read as anti-anti-Islamophobia) rally being held in Calgary with a large group of men who are actively training themselves in a paramilitary style offering "security." It needn't be said how immensely different this group (and most likely law enforcement) would view a few dozen Muslim men and woman doing similar training and/or making shows of force.

"We are willing to lay our lives down on the line and we're prepared to bleed for the country."

Regardless of the double standard that may be at play, the III%ers are organizing and growing quickly. They have positions like province-wide president, vice president, a sergeant of arms, treasurer, and have broken down the province into ten zones which themselves have corresponding leaders. Within these zones the members chose a role of either "soldiers" and "preppers." But the III%'s focus does appear to be on being a paramilitary organization.

"Battle training is just one part of our training but it is a big part. We are willing to lay our lives down on the line and we're prepared to bleed for the country," Welling told me.

To facilitate the groups need and want for training, the Alberta chapter has started moving towards buying 160 acres of land in central Alberta for a "III%er training ground, facility, and possible hunting pen." When asked in person about this Welling claimed that the group has already purchased land. When this development was brought up to Dr. Hofmann he wasn't surprised.

"Most likely, they're looking to fort up," said Hofmann. "They're looking to build the fences against a quote-unquote hostile government. They're likely looking to stockpile weapons and food and engage in military training. This is classic activity, it happens over and over again."

The group also works on an "alert system" and a threat level system, and Welling is willing to put his group "on notice." Several months ago, Welling learned of a (three-year-old) story regarding the closing of a Calgary mosque linked to the radicalization of three men and told his group to get ready.

"Jesus. Ready to bang, just say the word," read one reply in the secret group.

Welling received numerous statements from members saying they were ready, and itching, for a fight with "the invaders."

On more than one occasion III% members, including Welling, have expressed an urge to patrol the border. In recent days another group, Storm Alliance, has started making trips to the Quebec border to view refugee crossings. Welling stated that he had conducted border patrols with his group in the past but they are not regular. When briefed on the group's initial talk of border patrols back in February, Dr. Perry described the group's activities and preoccupation with the border as "disturbing."

"That terrifies me, it absolutely terrifies me. That is something that is very different from something we've seen in the past with the anti-authority groups," said Perry at the time. "That is a much more American style. We've seen the consequences there, there have been homicides on the border. There has been shootings and beatings on the border. So, that just really terrifies me."

"I really hope it's isolated," she added.
Ready to Take on the State

Back in the Calgary Denny's, Welling took a swig of coffee and asked his young son, whom he had brought along to the interview, if he wanted a smoothie before mentioning the recent terrorist attacks in the UK. This was not the first time that Welling had brought up the Manchester and London attacks in the conversation, nor would it be the last. It's clear when talking to the man that the III%ers are tied intrinsically to the current political strife.

He claims we are losing Canada, whatever that means, and it's time for action. But he also makes clear his group is prepared to disagree with the state in regards to the operation of his group. When asked what he would do if Canada's legal system came for him and the rest of the III%, he paused for a moment and responded cryptically.

"If the warrant was warrantless you could probably expect some resistance but if the warrant was warranted than we would make our member surrender," he said. "If it... was an illegal search and seizure, than most likely expect some resistance because it's not right.

"We want what's right, we'll stand up for what's right and what's honest."

Follow Mack Lamoureux on Twitter.

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/new9wd/the-birth-of-canadas-armed-anti-islamic-patriot-group

Apr 8, 2017

In Canada, Where Muslims Are Few, Group Stirs Fear of Islamists

CRAIG S. SMITH
The New York Times

APRIL 5, 2017

STONEHAM-ET-TEWKESBURY, Quebec — Patrick Beaudry, bejeweled, tattooed and bearded, lives on a remote wooded hillside in rural Quebec, worrying about living under Shariah law.

A year and a half ago, he huddled with two friends in a Quebec maple sugar shack, discussing how to stop the spread of what they call “invasive political Islam” in Canada. They formed a group called La Meute, or Wolfpack, created a Facebook page and invited like-minded people to join.

Within a month, they had 15,000 followers. Today, the number has surpassed 50,000, and the group is still attracting people. Now, Mr. Beaudry and his colleagues say they are shaping those followers into dues-paying members who will give the group financial muscle and, they hope, political clout.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has publicly opened Canada’s doors to refugees and presented a face of tolerance and inclusion in a world increasingly hostile to migration. But as Canadian immigration policy has transformed the nation over decades, pockets of intolerance have grown across the country.

Nowhere has it galvanized such large numbers as in Quebec, where many people still refer to themselves as pure laine, or pure wool, direct descendants of the 17th-century settlers of New France. The most emotional response has focused on conservative Muslim immigrants, who perhaps present the greatest contrast to traditional European-based culture and the secularism that Quebec struggled hard to win from the Roman Catholic Church.

The concerns are outsize by any measure. Muslims represent just 3 percent of Canada’s population, and while Islam is one of the fastest-growing religions in the country, Muslims will still account for less than 6 percent of the population in 2050, according to the Pew Research Center.

Nonetheless, Mr. Beaudry and his peers say they believe there is a real threat that Islamists are bending Canada’s tolerant culture to their will. The group’s main concern is political Islam pushed by the Muslim Brotherhood, the Pan-Arab movement that grew out of Egypt after the fall of the Ottoman Empire following World War I.

“Political Islam is slowly invading our institutions,” Mr. Beaudry declared, claiming that his group had documentary proof, though he was not prepared to show it. “We have to wake up people and shake them up, and then we will be able to bring change.”

The theme is popular among right-wing groups across North America and Europe, where the slow integration of conservative Muslim immigrants into Judeo-Christian cultures has excited fears among some of a global culture war.

A 2004 move to set up Shariah mediation for Muslim family disputes in Ontario, which already allowed Jewish and Catholic faith-based tribunals to operate in the province, incited a national outcry.

Quebec subsequently passed a law banning Shariah tribunals. Ontario eventually banned faith-based tribunals for all religions. Nonetheless, the events left an impression among many people that conservative Muslims were working to instill Shariah law in Canada.

Canadian Muslims say that not only are such fears unfounded, but that propagating them is also dangerous, to Muslims and to society as a whole.

“They are creating a problem where there is no problem,” said Hassan Guillet, a lawyer and imam.

Mr. Guillet said Canadian Muslims were caught between what he called a relentless and often-negative media focus on Islam and right-wing groups like La Meute that spread misinformation.

“If you keep rejecting the young, they will feel frustrated and feel that they don’t belong, and they will look for their own society,” Mr. Guillet warned, adding that such disenfranchisement had led some young European Muslims down the path of radicalization. “We don’t want that. We want our kids to feel that they belong, we want our kids to feel Canadian.”

As for the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Canada, Samer Majzoub, president of the Canadian Muslim Forum and a frequent target of conspiracy theories, called it simple fearmongering.

He noted that the largest recent terrorist attack in Canada did not come from Muslims, but targeted them. He was referring to the January killing of six worshi
pers at a mosque in Quebec by a gunman; the man accused of the killings espoused far-right views.

Small, violent right-wing groups have appeared in the decades since Canada relaxed its immigration laws to embrace multiculturalism. But revulsion toward violence and hate speech has kept such groups on the margins. La Meute has created a more moderate setting where people can communicate their fears.

“La Meute is very different from what we have seen so far,” said Samuel Tanner, an associate professor at the International Center for Comparative Criminology at the University of Montreal who studies Canada’s far right.

He likened the group’s followers to the blue-collar Democrats in the United States who supported President Trump. “They are a new type of right, blending conservatism with some liberal values,” he said.

Some experts warn that groups like La Meute, however much they eschew violence, create an enabling environment in which hate can grow. “They are embedded in a broader cultural ethos that bestows ‘permission to hate,’” said Barbara Perry, a professor at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology who has written extensively on right-wing extremism in Canada.

The conversation within La Meute’s private Facebook page can border on hateful. In response to one person’s request about what could be done to prevent construction of a mosque in the neighborhood, another follower suggested pouring pig’s blood on the ground and letting Muslims know the land had been desecrated.

While primarily confined to French-speaking Canada, La Meute lies on a continuum of conservative thought that is propelling politicians like Kellie Leitch, a member of Parliament who is vying for leadership of Canada’s Conservative Party. Ms. Leitch once proposed a tip line for people to report “barbaric cultural practices,” and has suggested that immigrants be screened for “Canadian values” so that the country can maintain “a unified Canadian identity.”

Mr. Beaudry, the son of a onetime lumberjack and heavy equipment operator, joined the Canadian Army when he was 17 and spent years in Germany. He retired from the army after a car accident in 2002 and subsequently spent several months working as a private contractor in Afghanistan. He was greatly influenced by the specter of Taliban rule.

He said he and his friends were motivated by the 2014 killing of two soldiers in Canada in separate episodes, both at the hands of Canadian extremists who had converted to Islam. “We realized something was happening,” Mr. Beaudry said, adding that terrorist attacks in France and Belgium followed soon after.

He said that the primary goal in founding La Meute was to educate members and others about the growth of political Islam in Canada.

Mr. Beaudry spoke specifically about the group’s opposition to the niqab and the burqa, Islamic styles of dress that cover women’s faces. Only a tiny sliver of the Canadian population adopts them, but “if people cannot blend with the society,” Mr. Beaudry said, “it becomes a cancer and if you want to save your life, you have to take action.”

He also believes a parliamentary motion passed last month that condemns Islamophobia is a move to silence criticism of political Islam and is the first step toward an Islamic anti-blasphemy law.

On the private Facebook page, La Meute’s leaders quiz followers, screening for the most informed and dedicated who might fill positions in the hierarchy.

Mr. Beaudry said La Meute was assigning followers to 17 geographic “clans,” each with officers and staff, “so people know who to report to and where to go when things happen.” He said five clans were “fully operational,” and he expected all to be formed by the end of the year.

The group has transportation cells that take people to meetings and has medical units to care for the injured. Some members recently started an online radio station. Last month, La Meute fielded about 400 people in four cities to protest the anti-Islamophobia motion.

“We are trying to teach people that they have much more political power, they matter much more than the majority believes,” Mr. Beaudry said. “We want to influence our world, our politics.”

Email Craig S. Smith at craig.smith@nytimes.com or follow him on Twitter
@craigss.

Ian Austen contributed reporting from Ottawa.

A version of this article appears in print on April 6, 2017, on Page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: In Canada, Where Muslims Are Few, Group Stirs Fear of Islamists
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/world/canada/la-meute-muslims-quebec.html?utm_source=Pew+Research+Center&utm_campaign=b16bc0029f-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_04_06&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3e953b9b70-b16bc0029f-400018169&_r=0

Jul 20, 2016

Not All Islamists Are Out to Kill Us


And other lessons about the GOP's overblown, dangerous rhetoric about radical jihadi terrorism.

·       

·      Foreign Policy Magazine

·      BY LAWRENCE PINTAK

·        JULY 19, 2016

·         

The challenge tweeted by Donald Trump’s military advisor, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, in the hours after the horrific Nice massacre was clear and direct: “In next 24 hours, I dare Arab & Persian world ‘leaders’ to step up to the plate and declare their Islamic ideology sick and must B healed.”

The same day, Newt Gingrich told Fox News that the United States must immediately take action to prevent similar attacks: “We should frankly test every person here who is of a Muslim background, and if they believe in sharia, they should be deported.”

 

Let’s think about that for a second. The “expert” advising the presumptive GOP presidential nominee wants the world’s Muslim leaders to denounce their own religion. And the man who could have been his vice president wants all Muslims who believe in the texts upon which their religion is based to be deported.

Ignorance or political expediency? Hard to say which is worse — or more dangerous.

It appears likely that the mass murderer in Nice, an emotionally unstable Tunisian-born Muslim, was somehow inspired by the blood-soaked ideology of the Islamic State. Thus, French President Francois Hollande’s comment that his nation remains under the “threat of Islamist terrorism” is understandable. But the problem with the term is that, as Flynn and Gingrich so readily demonstrate, it’s a short step from there to conflating the tiny minority of extremists with the rest of the world’s 1.7 billion Muslims.

Let’s concede it’s probably too much to expect politicians to convey a sophisticated understanding of the global religious landscape in a tweet or 10-second campaign soundbite. But perhaps we could move the bar right down to the lowest notch and agree that “Islamic,” “Islamist,” and “sharia” are not actually dirty words.

Something is “Islamic” if it has to do with Islam. Pretty straightforward.

An “Islamist” is someone who believes Islam is both a religion and a political movement that strives for the incorporation of Islamic teachings in national governance. That does not automatically equate to militancy. Plenty of American allies across the Muslim world fit that description. Relatively few American Muslims would consider themselves Islamists (much less extremists). A recent poll found that, like their Christian countrymen, the majority do not believe their religion should influence U.S. law.

And sharia, which roughly means “the Path,” isn’t a license to cut off heads. It’s a term used for the individual and societal mores derived from the texts upon which Islam is based: the Quran, the core holy book, and the Hadith,accounts of the Prophet Muhammad’s life and teachings. To ask Muslims to disavow them is like asking a Christian to renounce the Bible.

That’s kind of an important point.

“The Quran contains the rules by which the Muslim world is governed (or should govern itself) and forms the basis for relations between man and God, between individuals, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, as well as between man and things which are part of creation,” according to M. Cherif Bassiouni of the DePaul University College of Law. “The Sharia contains the rules by which a Muslim society is organized and governed, and it provides the means to resolve conflicts among individuals and between the individual and the state.”

In other words, there is a world of difference between a Muslim following the teachings of the Quran and the Hadith in her or his everyday life and wanting them to be the primary law of the land. That’s the case in only a handful of Muslim-majority countries, primarily Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf. More commonly in the Muslim world, Islamic law governs only in family courts or more generally serves as a moral compass for civil law, much as Judeo-Christian values do in the United States.

Trump has made much of the refusal of President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to use “radical” (or “militant”) and “Islam” (or “Muslim”) in the same sentence. It made them easy prey for the presumptive GOP nominee. He beat that dead horse again in the wake of the Nice tragedy on Thursday, even though they had abandoned the pretense in June.

“There’s no magic to the phrase ‘radical Islam.’ It’s a political talking point. It’s not a strategy,” Obama said dismissively the morning after the Orlando massacre. “Not once has an advisor of mine said, ‘Man, if we use that phrase, we’re going to turn this whole thing around.’”

Refusing to link the two words was an agonizing bit of verbal gymnastics. Supporters of the Islamic State, al Qaeda, and the like are Islamists and theyare radicals. Even many American Muslims — including Islamists — use those terms to differentiate themselves from the violent extremist minority.

“To truly understand the world Islamist extremist movement, one must realize it is not just a social phenomenon,” says an online primer on Islamic radicalism by the Islamic Supreme Council of America, “but is a full-fledged ideological war of words and weapons alike.”

Unfortunately, as Clinton and Obama seem to understand, in today’s hyper-inflamed political landscape, the distinction between an “Islamist extremist,” an “Islamist,” and a “Muslim” quickly gets lost in the fog of ill-informed cable news soundbites.

“Islamism is a political and theoretical philosophy that commands its adherents to wage violent jihad to murder or forcibly convert all infidels,” Ted Cruz once told CNN’s Anderson Cooper. “And by infidels, they mean every one of the rest of us. Islamism is our enemy.”

Actually, no. But such thinking would justify the patrols of Muslim neighborhoods that Cruz called for back in the spring and Gingrich and Trump continue to support. “You know, in the old days, we would have uniforms, you knew what you were fighting,” Trump told Bill O’Reilly on Foxthe day of the Nice attack. “We are allowing people into our country who we have no idea where they are, where they’re from, who they are, they have no paperwork, they have no documentation, in many cases.”

 

Defining the enemy, and the friend

“Words matter.” That was the opening sentence of a 2008 Department of Homeland Security memo created with input from American Muslims. “[E]xperts counseled caution in using terms such as, ‘jihadist,’ ‘Islamic terrorist,’ ‘Islamist’ and ‘holy warrior.’” The purpose of the document, titled “Terminology to Define the Terrorists,” was to both avoid offending Muslims and to ensure U.S. government spokespeople did not glamorize the militants.

The document was written long before a tiny handful of Muslims in America joined the jihad, before Europe was infiltrated by lethal Islamic State networks, and before opportunistic politicians tapped a xenophobic vein in the American body politic. Not since the immediate aftermath of 9/11 has the phrase “Islamic terrorism” — and its many variants — been so much a part of the national narrative. Or fear of terrorism been so great.

That’s why it is more important than ever to avoid throwing all Muslims into a political blender and producing a toxic Islamophobe smoothie. Hence Clinton’s response to Nice, condemning “radical jihadists who use Islam to recruit and radicalize others in order to pursue their evil agenda.” This isn’t about political correctness, it’s about differentiating the many threats and winning allies in the war against extremism at home and abroad. Or at least not making things worse.

Because at the end of the day, words shape perceptions, which shape policy, which often determines whether people live or die.

So, yeah, it’s important.

Scores of militant groups with wildly different agendas, all claiming to serve Islam, have been spawned since the first attacks on the United States in the early 1980s. Yet from the campaign trail to Capitol Hill, politicians are discussing the ever-growing threat with all the sophistication of a middle-school social-studies class.

Lt. Gen. Flynn, for example, called for Iranian leader “Khomeini” — who died in 1989 — to condemn the Nice attack. Perhaps it was a slip of the tongue: He probably meant Ayatollah Khomeini’s successor, Ali Khamenei, but we’re talking about a national security expert who is advising the man who might be the next president.

 

Oh, brotherhood…

A Senate bill to have Egypt’s Islamist Muslim Brotherhood declared a terrorist organization, introduced by Cruz, is a vivid example of what happens when the complexities of Middle East geopolitics are lost in a flurry of anti-Muslim campaign rhetoric.

“This is an issue that, just knowing their history, is a no-brainer,” says his co-sponsor of a companion bill in the House, Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (R-Fl.). Only if your history book was written in Texas. The Brotherhood’s history, which Díaz-Balart “knows” so well, includes winning Egypt’s first democratic election, gaining support from the White House, then being ousted in a military coup. “The Brotherhood’s stated goal is to wage violent jihad against its enemies,” Cruz said when he introduced the bill. Actually, it isn’t. The Brotherhood is a hugely complex organization. There are what most Americans would consider “good” guys and “bad” guys within the organization’s ranks. Kind of like the GOP.

As one might imagine, the military coup that ousted Egypt’s first freely elected president and the subsequent massacres and mass jailing of Brotherhood members soured some of them on the whole democracy and peaceful protest thing. Even the experts can’t agree whether the Muslim Brotherhood these days is “a terrorist organization or a firewall against violent extremism,” Marc Lynch of George Washington University recently wrote.

Then there’s all that really complicated stuff about recognizing that not all bad guys who act in the name of Islam are the same.

“If we lump together the Paris bombings [claimed by the Islamic State] and the Peshawar school attack [by the Pakistani Taliban] we get seduced by the commonalities and ignore the reality that they are carried out by very different groups for very different reasons,” an Arab diplomat at the UN told me. “The challenge [the West has] with concepts is the same as with language.”

Folks in the Muslim world certainly recognize that not all bad guys come from the same mold. Reporting on a rally by an anti-American political alliance, Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper described it as a “lashing together [of] reactionary and millenarian forces” that included “jihadists, sectarian warriors, orthodox mullahs [and] Islamic revivalists.”

You don’t hear those subtleties on the campaign trail.

As Alberto Fernandez, former State Department coordinator for strategic counterterrorism communication, has written, “the unhelpful and superficial rhetoric that exists today, including from high-level political figures,” is a “significant obstacle to developing coherent policy to face a very real threat.”

 

What we lost in the fire

Nice, Orlando, and San Bernardino remind us that operatives on the violent fringe of Islam, and disturbed individuals inspired by their propaganda, do exist inside Western democracies. But policies and rhetoric that target all Muslims on the pretext of neutralizing those few are counterproductive.

What is lost in such an approach is the fact that moderate Islamists have credibility among fellow Muslims. They have the potential to undermine the message of the radicals in ways American anti-extremist Twitter feeds never will. Painting them with the same brush as the militants because they’re all Islamists is just bad policy.

The point here is that it’s complicated. Muslims, even radical Muslims, come in many stripes. But our political and media narrative skews toward the aforementioned black and white. 

It’s neither helpful nor illuminating when, after the San Bernardino massacre, the New York Post headline screams: “MUSLIM KILLERS.”

There is no simple answer to the conundrum of Islam and language. The extremists are carrying out violence in the name of Islam; they do represent some subset of the religion. To ignore that would — as the denizens of right-wing talk radio constantly remind us — take political correctness to an unacceptable extreme and undermine America’s security.

But a narrative that transforms Islam into a derogatory epithet is equally dangerous.

“USG officials should continually emphasize a simple and straightforward truth: Muslims have been, and will continue to be part of the fabric of our country,” that 2008 DHS guidance memo advised. “Muslims are not ‘outsiders’ looking in but are an integral part of America.”

Amid the perfect storm of campaign rhetoric and Islamic State atrocities, that message is sounding pretty hollow.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/19/not-all-islamists-are-out-to-kill-us-united-states-trump-2016-isis/

Nov 4, 2015

Why The FBI Is Suspending Its Anti-Extremism Program

JACK JENKINS
Think Progress
November 2, 2015

 
FBI
The FBI at least temporarily suspended a web-based anti-extremism program on Monday, reportedly putting it on hold after it was criticized for unfairly profiling Muslim Americans.

According to a New York Times story published on Sunday, the FBI has reportedly been working on the program, entitled “Don’t Be A Puppet,” as part of a sustained campaign to stymie the recruitment efforts of militant groups such as ISIS. The website uses games to teach users — presumably young students and teachers — how to identify warning signs of radical extremism. As participants rack up correct answers to questions, scissors slowly cut away at a puppet’s strings until it is set free.

But when members of Islamic, Arab, and related groups were invited to preview the software two weeks ago, many expressed concerns that it unfairly focused on extremism perpetrated in the name of Islam, even though religious radicalism has not been a contributing factor in the recent wave of school shootings. The program also did little to address right-wing militancy, which has killed more Americans than jihadist attacks since the September 11 attacks.

The FBI’s job is to protect children of all faiths and backgrounds, not to offer programs that introduce suspicion into their relations with teachers and can lead to stigmatization and bullying by their peers.

“We were all on the same page in terms of being concerned,” Hoda Hawa, MPAC Director of Policy and Advocacy, told the Washington Post. “It seems like they’re asking teachers to be extensions of law enforcement and to police thought, and students as well. That was very concerning to us all.”

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) was also critical of the program, saying it continues the “government’s pattern of stigmatizing the Muslim community through its [countering violent extremism] initiative and fails to deal with the main threat to students, that of school shootings.”

“The FBI’s job is to protect children of all faiths and backgrounds, not to offer programs that introduce suspicion into their relations with teachers and can lead to stigmatization and bullying by their peers,” said CAIR Department to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia Director Corey Saylor, in a statement released on Monday.

Pressure mounted as representatives from MPAC, the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee, and other community groups sent a letter to the FBI arguing that anti-extremism efforts are most effective when led by community leaders themselves. As ThinkProgress reported in June, several local Muslim organizations, religious leaders, and imams are already undertaking this challenge — with many reporting successful results.

When members of the group went to the press to express their misgivings, the FBI reportedly told the Washington Post the program is now temporarily on hold as of November 2, and the website has yet to appear on the internet. ThinkProgress contacted the FBI to get clarity on the nature of the suspension, but the agency’s press office initially appeared unaware of any formal cancelation of the program. The agency then issued a noncommittal statement provided to other outlets.

“The FBI is developing a Web site designed to provide awareness about the dangers of violent extremist predators on the Internet, with input from students, educators and community leaders,” read the statement from the FBI.

Regardless, MPAC celebrated the suspension — temporary or otherwise — in a press release Monday morning.

“While we welcome efforts to promote the safety and security of our nation, tools like this that improperly characterize American Muslims as a suspect community with its targeted focus and stereotypical depictions stigmatize Muslim students (or those perceived as such) and can actually exasperate the problem by leading to bullying, bias, and religious profiling of students,” Hoda Hawa, MPAC Director of Policy and Advocacy, said.

Concern over the program is rooted in longstanding frustrations among Islamic groups regarding how some law enforcement agencies investigate possible extremists — i.e., often by stigmatizing Muslims. In 2012, news broke that the NYPD had been monitoring the communications of Muslims in and around New York City, and even paid a man to “bait” Muslims in criminal activity. The FBI roundly condemned the NYPD’s policy at the time, saying it had “a negative impact” overall and fractured important relationships between Muslim communities and law enforcement. The NYPD has since announced an effort to recruit more Muslim police officers to help rebuild trust, but issues remain.

TAGS




http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/11/02/3718376/fbi-temporarily-suspends-anti-extremism-program/