Showing posts with label Cult-anti. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cult-anti. Show all posts

Jan 12, 2020

'Free game for cults': hotline disappears despite record number of phone calls

The farm in Ruinerwold. © ANP
Sects are in danger of disappearing under the radar. While the number of reports from concerned family members of potential victims rose to a record high last year, the Sektes signal reporting point disappeared. "This is absurd. Politics must stop looking away, "says professor Fokko Oldenhuis.

Sander van Mersbergen
AD
January 6, 2020

[Google Translation]

Last year, 103 worried phone calls arrived at SektesIGN, which belonged to the same organization as Meld Misdaad Anoniem. That is a lot more than the years before, when serious reports were made every year between the sixties and eighties.

A striking number of phone calls were about mindfulness and happiness courses, which eventually degenerated into sexual and / or financial abuse of the participants. This often concerns women around 30, says Karin Krijnen, spokesperson for the organization that has since disappeared.

The task of Sektes signal was to bring serious signals to the attention of the right authorities. The hotline ceased to exist on 1 January, because the House of Representatives decided a few years ago to stop the subsidy. There will be no successor.

Just last year and in 2018, however, many  alarming signals about possible cults surfaced  . Such as ayahuasca healings in  Eersel  and  IJzendijke , where two people died. Reports of this kind of healings were regularly received by Sektesignal. A father was also found in Ruinerwold in Drenthe who had lived with his children for years in the basement of a farm. This  Gerrit Jan van D.  built a secret 'spiritual center' there.

To care

Experts are therefore worried. "You need an agency that monitors these kinds of movements, and rings the bell if things go wrong," says Fokko Oldenhuis, honorary professor of Religion and Law in Groningen. ,, It is absurd that there is no longer a hotline. Such an organization should actually play a greater role. Politics must take measures and stop looking away. "

Victims of sects and their relatives now have access to, for example, the police. "But if you report that people are isolated or that we think they are in control, they can't do much with that," says Krijnen. "An abuse is something other than an offense."

In order to ensure that the knowledge gained does not disappear completely, the hotline transfers a list of over 150 possible sects, including information about leaders, victims and the nature of the movement, to the Ministry of Justice and Security.

In a response, the ministry reports that the disappearance of the reporting point can be accommodated. "The files from Sektesignal show that the current set of instruments of the police, enforcers and supervisors is sufficient to effectively deal with abuses within sects."

https://www.ad.nl/binnenland/vrij-spel-voor-sektes-meldpunt-verdwijnt-ondanks-recordaantal-telefoontjes~aac897e9/

Oct 1, 2019

Fight against sects: Miviludes will disappear

Fronton of the Ministry of the Interior place Beauvau © AFP / CHRISTOPHE ARCHAMBAULT
Ouafia Kheniche
October 1, 2019
France Inter

(Google Translation)

Information France Inter:
The interministerial Mission of vigilance and fight against sectarian aberrations (Miviludes), which no longer has a president for a year, will disappear. Its officials will be attached to the Ministry of the Interior.

When we call the Interministerial Mission of vigilance and fight against sectarian excesses (Miviludes), the phone rings in a vacuum. After a few minutes, you end up falling on the telephone switchboard of the Prime Minister to which the interministerial body is still attached today.

According to our information, the Miviludes, which was created in 2002, will disappear on January 1, 2020. The direction of Miviludes summoned several members of the mission Monday afternoon to announce to them that they would be attached to the ministry of Interior. "The Miviludes will be purely and simply dissolved in the Ministry of the Interior", confirms us an association that collaborates with the interministerial mission for many years.

In a royal ministry, a spokesman reports "rumors of merger or reorganization that circulate between Miviludes and the Interior." Contacted by France Inter, Georges Fenech, who chaired the mission from 2008 to 2012, confirms the end of the Miviludes in its current form." This is a disaster, and this decision is of terrible consequence, and this institution was envied by the world, " he says.

"Indeed the government has decided to attach Miviludes to the Ministry of the Interior", finally told us Tuesday a spokesman of the Ministry of the Interior without more details.

A mission that idles


The Miviludes is an interministerial mission instituted with the Prime Minister by presidential decree of November 28, 2002 . It "carries out an action of observation and analysis of the sectarian phenomenon, coordinates the preventive and repressive action of the public authorities against the sectarian excesses, contributes to the formation and the information of its agents and informs the public on the risks and dangers to which it is exposed", according to its website.

During its 17 years of existence, it has mainly published detailed annual reports on sectarian risks (including their relationship to the Internet, apocalyptic movements in 2012, drifts in vocational training, how sects target minors, etc.) and struggled at length with Scientology, "our toughest opponent," as his former president Serge Blisko once said, including a court-ordered conviction for "organized gang scam."

For several months, rumors rustling on the future of the interministerial mission and especially since the departure of its last president in activity. Serge Blisko retired in October 2018 and has not been replaced since. According to an associative actor who speaks on condition of anonymity, the activity is slow in the Miviludes. "Since a few weeks almost no one answers".

In May 2017, a report of the Court of Auditors already questioned the "fragilities" of the Miviludes and considered that its "operational character could be reinforced by a connection to the Minister of the Interior." The decision of this connection would have been been taken for the sake of economy and efficiency . Of the ten or so people currently working for the mission, only three would be attached to the ministry. For the moment, other employees do not know what they will become.

Fusion within the Ministry of the Interior


The government reportedly hesitated between two services of the Ministry of the Interior, according to one of our sources: the Interministerial Committee for the Prevention of Delinquency and Radicalization (CIPDR) or the office of worship. It will finally be with the CIPDR that Miviludes will be merged, after 25 years of existence, the legacy of a very first observatory of sectarian movements, created in 1996 by then Prime Minister Alain Juppé. It is for memory this interministerial mission which recently, for example, revealed the marketing of the patches supposed to "cure" the Alzheimer's disease , sold 1 500 euros pieces.

The fears of the associative actors


The former president of the mission Georges Fenech, president of the mission from 2008 to 2012 regrets this decision because he believes that the fight against sects and against radicalization are two different fights . "Certainly the sects are found in the religious world, but also in health, education, culture or the sports world," he says. In his eyes, to save money, we deprive ourselves of a fundamental tool and we do away with the fight against sects.

On their side, actors of the associative world that we contacted fear of not being able to accompany the victims correctly.

https://www.franceinter.fr/lutte-contre-les-sectes-la-miviludes-va-t-elle-disparaitre

Sep 23, 2017

China launches anti-cult digital platforms




Xinhua
September 22, 2017

BEIJING, Sept. 22 (Xinhua) -- China's State Council Friday launched digital platforms and an online pledge to encourage the public to take a stand against cults.

It opened a website named China Anti-Cult Network (www.chinafxj.cn), along with official Weibo and Wechat social media accounts, aiming to promote the preventative measures and policies that China has for combatting cults, offer interpretation of the anti-cult law and related information.

The website also has a section where the public can report criminal offences related to cults.

It provides psychological guidance for the victims of cults and their families, and assistance in the search for missing relatives.

An online pledge called "Say No to Cults" calls for the public to sign their names to show they oppose and resist cults.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-09/22/c_136629955.htm

Nov 10, 2016

Deprogrammed - Reviewed by Joseph Szimhart

Documentary film by Mia Donovan, 2015
Eye Steel Film, Canada

 

Ted ‘Black Lightning’ Patrick’s anti-cult crusade.
Reviewed by Joseph Szimhart, 2016

Watch 

In 2011 someone posted this on a religion chat group: “What ever happened to deprogrammer Ted Patrick?” The writer, Snapdragon, had read Let Our Children Go by Patrick and Dulak (1976) and Snapping: America’s Epidemic of Sudden Personality Change by Flo Conway and Jim Segalman (1978). Snapdragon noted no news in twenty years about Patrick. One response to Snapdragon indicated that cults were no longer big news and that the Children of God sex-for-Jesus cult, one of the big five or six new religions targeted by Ted Patrick in the 1970s, had morphed into a smaller, tamer version restyled as The Family. Mia Donovan’s documentary film Deprogrammed goes a long way to answer Snapdragon’s query (not in the film). Donovan offers intimate insights into the origins of and controversies surrounding deprogramming Ted Patrick style, which often involved abduction of the cult member and indecorous debate about cult beliefs and leaders.

Patrick, now 86, began his cult intervention career in 1971 in San Diego. He inadvertently initiated a shadowy industry of interventionists as well as several anti-cult organizations. The latter found in Patrick’s approach something concrete to do about thousands if not millions of mostly young adult seekers suddenly taken in by controversial new religions and unmoderated self-help movements. Simply put, families could kidnap a cult member and hire deprogrammers, hopefully to break the “spell” of the cult, thus curing the problem. It was not that easy, of course, and Donovan’s careful film makes that very clear. Coercive deprogrammers operated in America and abroad for perhaps two decades—Patrick attempted one of his last kidnap-style interventions in the early 1990s. The majority of his attempts occurred between 1971 and 1980. Donovan’s interest in this topic was personal. One of her main subjects in the film was her step-brother, Matthew Robinson, who was one of Patrick’s last, if ill-advised interventions. It failed and Matthew was yet embittered by the interaction with Patrick around 1993.

By way of disclosure, I have had some skin in this deprogramming game. I stood trial in Idaho for one month in 1993 for criminal charges of allegedly abducting a cult member—I was acquitted. My formal intervention career began in 1985. That was when I first agreed to assist two seasoned deprogrammers in an intervention. That intervention was semi-coercive. There was no security save a husband and his parents and the thirty-degrees below zero weather in Minnesota at the time. We stayed indoors. The wife, age 31, had become immersed in a large New Age sect, one that I had been devoted to for over a year until I defected in 1980. So, I was the token ex-member there to explain why I defected. My reputation grew. Subsequently, I got caught up in the intervention business and made most my living as a cult interventionist from 1986 through 1998. Most cases involved no illegal coercion. The last case I did that involved coercion was in 1992 with a naïve, female college student who fell under the sway and sexual abuse of a bizarre music teacher, aged 55, who manipulated her with Applied Kinesiology, a bogus channeling technique. The family members would not allow the young lady to leave the house the first night. The next morning, she agreed to stay and talk with me for three days. That intervention was successful.

Donovan concentrates on several individuals who encountered Patrick decades ago as subjects of deprogramming. We hear from them currently as well as from them on archival news videos with Patrick confronting them. Patrick regularly used the curious news media to get his message out. One subject was in the Unification Church or Moonies, another followed Swami Rudrananda or “Rudi” who was of German heritage, and another was in the Christ Family led by Lightning Amen. The last man, now elderly, is yet a believer living on the dwindled group’s communal grounds after the leader died. After Patrick freed the son of Sondra Sachs from the Hare Krishna movement in 1973, she became his secretary. Sachs appears in the film to tell her story. Professor of sociology Stephen Kent of the University of Alberta offers a social science perspective on the cult phenomenon and the impct of deprogramming. We also meet Flow Conway and Jim Segalman, mentioned above, the researchers who met with Patrick and dozens of ex-members. As brought out in this film, their 1978 book Snapping utilized subjects of Patrick’s interventions for much of the data. Snapping may have been science deficient, but it did address a very real problem that no journalist had tackled to that date. The problem was “information disease,” a phrase the authors coined to indicate the content of mind in converts influenced by deceptive, controversial movements.

Richard Dawkins, the famed atheist, in 1976 coined the neologism “meme” (imitated idea) that reinforces the possibility of information disease. Memes, per Dawkins, can “go viral” using an evolutionary or biological model, so flawed, dangerous, or “diseased” memes can go viral. This is another way of saying that cult members participate in a shared delusion. The evidence was noted by Patrick in his nephew and his friends who nearly got recruited by a local Jesus cult and when Patrick infiltrated that cult in 1971. Within days, Ted said he felt his mind giving in to the ideas of the cult despite feeling armored against it going in. Patrick called it hypnotism or a spell—he was not far off though his grasp of cognitive function lacked sophistication. Patrick sorely lacked training or education about social influence. His limitations led to his often-abusive tactics to “break” someone of a cult “spell” and that got him into legal trouble often. Conway and Segalman called this sudden change process “snapping” indicating that moment when someone snaps into or out of a powerful conversion. The film brings out deprogramming controversy when it portrays Patrick as a kind of crusader with good intentions if not the best of techniques. Social scientists viewed Patrick’s “cure” as more harmful than the “disease.” The film exposes that the worse Patrick could paint the cults, the more heroic he could appear. Nevertheless, Patrick had a direct hand in freeing many hundreds of cult members from cult memes or information disease.

I first met and spoke with Ted Patrick late in his career in the early 1990s at a national cult awareness conference that had, years before, moved to reject all forms of coercive intervention or deprogramming. Not everyone attending these conferences agreed, especially the old guard of Patrick devotees who felt that deprogramming was necessary to truly un-brainwash a cult member. Among these devotees were fundamentalist Christians, who in one survey that I recall, were more inclined than other demographic groups to approve of coercive deprogramming. Fundamentalists are especially invested in saving a cult member’s soul by bringing them back to the true Gospel.

In the film, we learn that Patrick grew up with Black church, Protestant values as well as a recognition that the Black churches had their share of bad cult leaders like Father Divine and Billy Sunday. Patrick revealed his myopic vision of cult history when he affirms that as a Black man he already knew of this cult phenomenon that lately, around 1970, hit White America. The film does not bring out why Patrick had a string of successful deprogrammings in mid-career. People I knew that worked with him were all ex-members that might employ for relatively low fees to assist on cases. At his peak, Patrick had many cases going on simultaneously or overlapping, so he tended to show up days into the interaction with a captive cult member. Often, by that time, the ex-members had done their job well, but Patrick would come in, interact with the now ex-member for a day or less, take credit for the success, and collect the lion’s share of the fees. Patrick created a business model, a machine that made him famous and that many came to believe was the only way to free brainwashed people.

One of my peers in this intervention business, Rick Ross, appeared in the film to address the evolution of Patrick’s model into the non-coercive exit counseling approach. The latter approach allowed the targeted cult member to refuse to talk and to leave the intervention at any time. Ross claimed that Patrick laid the foundation for what later became the non-coercive model. Other peers were consulted including David Clark and Steve Hassan who appear only in credits at the end of the film. No, I was not among those not consulted, but had I been I would argue that the so-called exit-counseling model existed long before Patrick and Galen Kelly (not mentioned in the film) employed kidnapping to deprogram in the early 1970s. Uncounted thousands in the late Sixties entered and defected from cults either on their own or through contact with ex-members, concerned families, and ministers. One study conducted by the United Kingdom sociologist Eileen Barker indicated that fully 80% of Unification Church converts (Moonies) defected within a year by means mentioned above. Others might take several years, even decades before defection. Some die as believers. Being under a spell or brainwashed is never a fixed state—that is not how the human brain works. Of course, there are exceptions with some people stubbornly holding onto a conversion no matter what. The clear majority of my many hundreds of interventions over the years were done through an educational model and without coercion. That model was uniquely defined by Steve Hassan with the publication of Combatting Cult Mind Control (1988).

The purpose of this film was quite simple. It concentrated on the legacy of Ted Patrick. As I mentioned above, the filmmaker’s step-brother Matthew was the spark that brought Donovan into this project. She had not seen him in 20 years until she learned of her father hiring Patrick in the mid-1990s to deprogram Matthew out of what appeared to be a devotion to Satanism. Matthew, a heavily tattooed man who employs the F-word liberally, as a youth was troubled, rebellious, into heavy metal music, and most likely suffered from social anxiety and other disorders that were never properly diagnosed or treated. As we learn in the film, Matthew’s allusions to Satan were more for effect than devotion (there was no cult), so Patrick’s kidnap technique was totally misguided. It essentially failed after eight days of verbal and emotional assault on the young rebel. The intervention may have done harm if we believe Matthew decades later.

In sum, the film was much better than I envisioned. It captures a unique era of the so-called cult wars when America was more focused with concern over bourgeoning new religious movements and therapies. The movements have not all gone away and new, radical ones continue to emerge. If nothing else, Ted Patrick helped to bring attention to a serious problem despite not coming up with the best or legal solutions. The problem has not gone away and viable solutions are still lacking. The film reminds us that the problem is complex as might be any solution. The film captures a unique aspect in the history of social reaction to radical new movements.

http://ask.metafilter.com/192171/What-ever-happened-to-deprogrammer-Ted-Patrick

jszimhart@gmail.com

http://jszimhart.com/book_and_film_reviews/deprogrammed_2015

Oct 20, 2015

Life after Doomsday

SIMON LEWSEN
The Walrus
NOVEMBER 2015  

WHEN MIKE KROPVELD was twenty-eight, he helped plan a mission to rescue his friend, a teacher named Benji Carroll, from an international cult. Kropveld remembers hosting a meeting with Carroll's parents and several distraught friends in his cramped Montreal living room. "His parents bought Danishes, but nobody ate them," he says. On a trip to Berkeley, California, Carroll was recruited by members of a branch of the Unification Church, a religious order popularly known as the Moonies. It was 1977, and thanks to the Manson Family and the People's Temple, terms such as mind control and brainwashing had entered the lexicon. At the time, the Bay Area city was a hotbed for unconventional beliefs. "People called it Berzerkeley," Kropveld says.

Although Carroll had mostly lost contact with his Montreal community, he eventually agreed to meet his mother and sister at the San Francisco airport. They brought him to a nearby hotel, where a group of his closest friends ambushed him and held him captive in a house a few blocks away. Over two days, a professional "deprogrammer," who also worked as an auto mechanic and antique dealer in the Bay Area, talked Carroll into returning to Montreal.

Kropveld caught pneumonia shortly before the team's departure and was unable to go along. It was probably for the best: earlier that year, he visited Carroll and wound up living on a Moonie commune for two weeks before extricating himself. "In retrospect, I don't think they liked me very much," he says. "I asked too many questions."

The group's intervention for Carroll became local legend: journalist Josh Freed wrote a six-part Montreal Star series about it and soon began receiving calls from desperate people whose loved ones had joined cults. To field their requests, Kropveld and some friends founded the Cult Information Centre. Shortly thereafter, Kropveld established an organization called Cult Project, operating under the B'Nai Brith Hillel Foundation of Montreal. In 1990, that venture became Info-Cult/Info-Secte, a bilingual, non-profit counselling service and research archive, which Kropveld, now executive director, operates out of a second-floor office in the city's Mile End neighbourhood. The group provides free information and advice about marginal religious orders, alternative psychological and therapeutic centres, pyramid schemes, militias, pseudoscience movements, conspiracy theorists, and occult communities.

Kropveld, now a slender, bespectacled man in his sixties, met me last April at Info-Cult's headquarters, wearing faded jeans hiked up and belted over a pink button-down. The space has the oppressive lighting of a morgue on a cop show, and it's crammed with bookcases, boxes, and shipping crates. A few years ago, thieves broke in and stole Kropveld's computer. They probably thought they were robbing a storage locker.

His vast collection comprises documents—sacred texts, manifestos, court records—pertaining to more than 2,000 groups. During an afternoon of digging, I found a book on UFOs with aerial photographs of crop circles, a cheap grimoire of Satanic spells, and a ten-song vinyl LP called The Road to Freedom by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard (it includes two guest appearances from John Travolta). Info-Cult survives on meagre Quebec government funding, as well as donations from foundations and individuals, some who have used Kropveld's services in the past. He gets most of his material by photocopying court documents, writing to academic publishers for review copies of books, and encouraging former cult members to donate whatever texts they haven't yet thrown out or burned.

Kropveld deals with roughly 1,000 clients every year, each facing conundrums that range from trivial to grim. He recalls a restaurateur in the early '90s who wondered if he should rent his dining room to the Raelians. "I told him to come here, read up on them, and decide for himself," he says. He also assisted a former long-time member of the messianic Ant Hill Kids commune who was struggling to fill out her CV. The group's long-bearded preacher, Roch "Moses" Thériault, made headlines in the late '80s for presiding over ritual dismemberments at his Burnt River, Ontario, compound. "I said, you don't want to lie on your resumé," Kropveld says, "but you definitely don't want to mention Thériault." It occurred to him that Ant Hill disciples had supported themselves by selling baked goods to the local townspeople. "Write down that you worked in a bakery," he told her.

In his thirty-eight-year career, Kropveld has seen the membership rosters of seemingly robust movements, such as the Hare Krishnas or the Children of God, gradually erode from defections, and he's discovered that, although cults are, by definition, estranged from society, they're still susceptible to trends. The hippy communes of the '60s and '70s have given way to the self-help and wellness centres of today.

Most significantly, his experiences have made him skeptical of the way we understand brainwashing. "We tend to think that it is this all-encompassing, powerful technique," Kropveld says. "In reality, it doesn't work like that. Even with the most dominant movements, you still get a large number of walk-aways." He recalls a distraught couple whose teenage daughter joined a Bible-based group. In private, the daughter confessed to Kropveld that she planned to defect but hadn't yet told her parents: she didn't want them knowing they were right all along. "Two weeks later, the parents called me and said, 'Thank you so much. You saved my daughter,'" Kropveld says. "But I didn't do anything. She was already halfway out the door."

During the afternoon I spent combing through Kropveld's library for oddities, he perched behind his computer, catching up on dozens of emails. For the most part, he says, open, non-judgmental communication will do more than a radical intervention like the one he planned in the '70s. "There are a lot of apocalyptic or millenarian movements, but not many are what I'd call violent," says Kropveld. We need to understand outsider belief systems, he argues, but we don't often need to combat them—the freedom to choose one's religious affiliation is a democratic right. "I'm not here to tell people what to do," he says. "I'll leave that to the cult leaders."

Simon Lewsen is copy editor for the Walrus Foundation. He has contributed to the Globe and Mail, Hazlitt, and The Walrus.Jenn Liv (jennliv.com) debuted Muahahaha at the 2014 Toronto Comic Arts Festival.

Nov 5, 2013

Charting the Information Field: Cult‐Watching Groups and the Construction of Images of New Religious Movements

Eileen Barker

This chapter presents an exercise in the practical application of the sociology of knowledge, the key question being the variety of often-conflicting descriptions that are publicly available on the content and nature of new religions. Various types of perspectives about the movements are delineated with an discussion of “where they are coming from” — that is, what are the underlying interests concerning the movements that motivate the members of different categories of “cult-watching groups” — how the methodology they employ results in their selecting certain aspects of the movements' beliefs, practices, and organization (and ignoring other aspects) in the construction of their images of the movements.


From Teaching New Religious Movements, David G. BromleyPublished to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007



ISBN-13: 9780195177299